Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 177 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. All we've heard are wild accusations without any shred of evidence.

Why wait 36 years? He was an important person before as well, he got higher and higher in the judiciary every 5 or so years it seems, ever since the Bush era he has been climbing up and fast, why not reveal things back then?

Her story also changed so much, first she could only remember it in a session with a therapist in 2012, now she is saying she told her husband years before, so which one is it? did she have no recollection till 2012 or did she always had this memory? If she did have it even before 2012, why not say anything back then?

If she had it after why not saying anything? she's had 36 years to say something, why exactly now?

And again, INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. But we won't be able to find out if its true or not ever, because she waited 36 years and no evidence exists now, even if it potentially existed. So all she is doing smearing his name and preventing the nomination.

I feel like ultimately Trump should say fuck you do all the democrats and nominate a different candidate as a fuck you to all of them and have it expedited and done quickly and swiftly. They can't pay off enough people and quickly enough to be able to smear every single judicial candidate he nominates.

Trumo should step up though, he should order the FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Army intelligence to find the money links to these democratic party operatives, massive investigations into the money links and find out that its George Soros, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Rothschilds, Clinton crime family, etc... that subvert US democracy, NOT Russia, NOT anyone else!

This isn't a trial.

You know nothing about sexual assault victims.

Go fuck yourself, Vlad.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
They can put almost anything down in a written statement. If they know there will be no cross examination under oath they are safe to "mis-remember" in a letter one way. If in the unlikelyhood they are questioned by the FBI they can always "mis-remember" another way. Since the incident happened 36 years ago its not likely perjury would be charged. In normal circumstances that's something rarely charged.

That's why Republicans don't want the FBI involved.

If the FBI were called right when Ford's story broke and additional information would have been gathered by now.
There is nothing stopping the Democrats from continuing an investigation, even after Kavanaugh is seated, if he's seated.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
What about the 3 other witnesses that Dr. Ford named in her letter that later said they weren't there and it never happened?

Liar

"WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh misrepresented the record Thursday when he stated that three witnesses have refuted Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that he sexually assaulted her at a party more than 30 years ago.

The three swore they had no recollection of the party — providing no support for Ford's accusations laid out to the Senate Judiciary Committee. But their statements do not disprove the allegations, either.

KAVANAUGH: "Dr. Ford's allegations are not merely uncorroborated, it's refuted by the very people she says were there."

THE FACTS: The statements in question do not corroborate Ford's allegations, but they also do not exonerate Kavanaugh. They leave open the possibility that people at the small gathering forgot about it or were not in position to witness the assault.

Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says "I have no memory of this alleged incident," ''do not recall the party" and "never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes."

In another statement, Patrick J. Smyth, identified by Ford as being among those downstairs at the party, says "I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.'"

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/20...ap-us-supreme-court-kavanaugh-fact-check.html
 
Last edited:

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
Libtards better hope he is not confirmed. He is not going to forget
the complete bullshit the demcrats put him and his family through He will
absolutely FUCK the leftist agendas every way he can in the next 20 years.
you you libtards were scared of him before this, well you god damn better
be down right terrified of what may come.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Dude your country is being stolen from you. Fix your own shit.

Btw a nice bit of classic eastern European antisemitism there calling out Soros and the Rothschilds. Your country fought against nazis now you are not so slowly becoming them.

dude, the Soviets always hated Jews. They hated Nazis more, but they also killed a shit-ton of jews...shit, they might have killed more jews than Nazis. Stalin really was a piece of shit, you know? The difference is that the Nazis were Germans, which means they implemented lethal precision in every thing they did. It was a factory. It was efficient. It was targeted. It was, in its way, far more heinous.

....but the Soviets just killed everyone. At least 10x and up to 50x more than the Germans. True story. They were just an all-inclusive, semi-random murder machine.

Guru cries himself to sleep, desperately hoping that those days return.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Folks, I'm conservative (or rather libertarian to be more exact) and am all in favor of ousting Kavanaugh from getting on the Supreme Court after his childish performance.

But you are seriously high as fucking snorting cocaine and taking acid tabs right now if you HONESTLY believe yourself when you say that Kav can be impeached. You're simply fucking high.

I like your language.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,522
759
146
Can someone tell me why there wasn't enough time?

https://www.politico.com/story/2018...t-mcconnell-ultimatum-senate-democrats-734360

The Senate majority leader privately told senior Republicans on Wednesday that if Democrats keep pushing for access to upwards of a million pages in records from President Donald Trump’s high court pick, he’s prepared to let Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote slip until just before November’s midterm elections, according to multiple sources.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Can someone tell me why there wasn't enough time?

https://www.politico.com/story/2018...t-mcconnell-ultimatum-senate-democrats-734360

The Senate majority leader privately told senior Republicans on Wednesday that if Democrats keep pushing for access to upwards of a million pages in records from President Donald Trump’s high court pick, he’s prepared to let Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote slip until just before November’s midterm elections, according to multiple sources.

A week old story? In politics those 7 days lasted forever.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
Libtards better hope he is not confirmed. He is not going to forget
the complete bullshit the demcrats put him and his family through He will
absolutely FUCK the leftist agendas every way he can in the next 20 years.
you you libtards were scared of him before this, well you god damn better
be down right terrified of what may come.

Well golly! That sounds like another really good reason to confirm this guy!

Partisan judges for the win!

/s
 
Reactions: umbrella39

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,875
10,300
136
Libtards better hope he is not confirmed. He is not going to forget
the complete bullshit the demcrats put him and his family through He will
absolutely FUCK the leftist agendas every way he can in the next 20 years.
you you libtards were scared of him before this, well you god damn better
be down right terrified of what may come.
Sounds like he should really be on the USSC if he is going to judge based on his personal vendettas verses the law and constitution. More proof any right winger on here would piss on the constitution if they thought it'd make one liberal mad. For people that the run all of the government you sure are the victims a lot.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,852
8,313
136
Those siding with WHY DID FEINSTEIN WAIT?
Senator Feinstein made that quite clear.
She said Ford sent the letter and...AND Ford asked that it and her name be held secret.
And so.... Senator Feinstein did exactly THAT.
Kept it quiet as Ford had asked.
It was only after Ford realized her assault went public that Ford also realized keeping this quite WAS NO LONGER possible.
So in short, Senator Feinstein KEPT HER WORD.
Can anyone still remember what it is to KEEP ONES WORD?
Grassley can't.
Going by Grassley, if someone tells you a secret and asks you to keep it quiet, you should not keep it quiet.
Grassley IS the snake in the grass-ley.
How'd you fell about buying a car from this idiot?

And is it any surprise that Donald Trump would TOTALLY ignore the words from this woman, Ford, and side with the rapist?
Watching Kavanaugh and knowing how Trump feels about grabbing women and where to grab them by, it is obvious Kavanaugh is just another Donald Trump.
And how would people feel with Donald Trump on the US Supreme Court?
Well.... THAT is exactly what we are about to get.
Donald Trump in the Whitehouse AND Donald Trump on the US Supreme Court.
Yup, you got it right. Pussy grabbing Trump will toast his man if confirmed and happily with his ever-smirky smile.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
gawd damn EDIT button

Was this the post you lost:

I'm going to be generous. Here is a brilliant profile that his thoroughly and honestly reported

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/03/12/christopher-steele-the-man-behind-the-trump-dossier

I'm not holding my breath that you can digest what journalism looks like, but do yourself a favor: be patient and just repeat in your head that you are "Reading facts. I am reading facts. I am reading facts. I am reading facts." It's a nice mantra, and will help you get through this godawful article that includes way too many facts and way too much honest, sweaty, brilliant reporting. It sucks, I know. It's hard, I know. Some leggy woman in a miniskirt isn't yelling this to you in short 30 second sound bites with a wink, over coffee, but I trust that you are old enough to remember how to read.

So, shit man, give it a shot. Maybe America has a chance. LoL--probably not: You're still alive.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
I should be in marketing, my guerrilla tactics on knowing how to make threads to target a certain demographic on here, that causes them to come running like Pavlovas dogs when the bells rings and its lasting effects is epic., you can go to bed now to slowly let the realization that you have been owned settle in.

<insert excessive amounts of HAHAHAs>
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
They should just pack the courts when they're in power again.

Honestly, I don't like this idea.

At least, I don't like it without including term limits and specific rules for replacement/turnover/protecting the tenure of current-serving justices. All sorts of things.

Bush II actually floated a brilliant SCOTUS term policy revision (it was from a liberal think tank, of all things....) but no one paid attention.

Never-mind that his admin worked tireless at appointing scandalous asshole conservative justices to important positions, but at the very leas--they recognized that the SCOTUS model is so clearly fucked by modern politics.

Hell, last time it was fixed, it took a democrat to ram-rod the current order in place, introduce 9 seats, pass the New Deal, and this country has never been and maybe never will be as prosperous again: 6 straight decades of growth and a strong, proud, wonderful middle class........that eventually decided in the 80s to start voting to kill itself off when the GOP convinced them that blacks were evil jews that wanted to rape their wives, give them AIDS, and thus they would never own a yacht, lol. Seriously: that is every fucking Reagan voter. Every fucking one. This is what they still believe. They do.

Oh god I love this shit.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,854
136
<insert excessive amounts of HAHAHAs>
Shorter, more accurate version of what he said: "When I anonymously say stupid shit on a website, people on that website come to point and laugh."

Dipshit is bragging as if he invented internet trolling, which is kinda hilarious in and of itself.
 
Reactions: Victorian Gray
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
I know, but wasn't that already set? So at the time McConnell was thinking they would probably enthuse the Republicans and harm the red state Democrats if the vote happened right before the midterm elections.
Some political folks think that if McConnell held the Supreme Court vote until just after the mid-term elections that it would energize the Republican base and insure big turnouts, especially in the red state Senate races.
This would (in theory) insure a 5 or 6 Republican Senate win.

I think it's an idiot idea, I still think Republicans will pick up 3 or 4 seats in the Senate, but no one knows.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/2018_elections_senate_map.html
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Remember the question about boofing ,there was an entry in Brett's yearbook that said have you Boofed? and Kavanaugh tried to say it was about farts, I think most people have farted by high school, correct? Turns out boofing means ingesting drugs or alcohol anally. This guy is a real piece of work.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Appointments to the supreme court are NOT an election. The court of public opinion means absolutely ZIP ZERO NOTHING NADA.

You just contradicted your position within a single line of text.

Good work, my friend.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Remember the question about boffing ,there was an entry in Brett's yearbook that said have you Boffed? and Kavanaugh tried to say it was about farts, I think most people have farted by high school, correct? Turns out boffing means ingesting drugs or alcohol anally. This guy is a real piece of work.
Seriously? And for some reason you think your definition is not only right, but that he lied?
 

ecogen

Golden Member
Dec 24, 2016
1,217
1,288
136
Honestly, I don't like this idea.

At least, I don't like it without including term limits and specific rules for replacement/turnover/protecting the tenure of current-serving justices. All sorts of things.

Bush II actually floated a brilliant SCOTUS term policy revision (it was from a liberal think tank, of all things....) but no one paid attention.

Never-mind that his admin worked tireless at appointing scandalous asshole conservative justices to important positions, but at the very leas--they recognized that the SCOTUS model is so clearly fucked by modern politics.

Hell, last time it was fixed, it took a democrat to ram-rod the current order in place, introduce 9 seats, pass the New Deal, and this country has never been and maybe never will be as prosperous again: 6 straight decades of growth and a strong, proud, wonderful middle class........that eventually decided in the 80s to start voting to kill itself off when the GOP convinced them that blacks were evil jews that wanted to rape their wives, give them AIDS, and thus they would never own a yacht, lol. Seriously: that is every fucking Reagan voter. Every fucking one. This is what they still believe. They do.

Oh god I love this shit.

All I know is the Dems have to do something, and I don't see anything else that's realistic. You guys seem kinda fucked for a while if the Dems sit on their asses and continue to use kid gloves.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |