Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 191 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ecogen

Golden Member
Dec 24, 2016
1,217
1,288
136
Let's get real here...I'm a "disingenuous prick" in your pea-sized brain because you have no other way to cope with facts that don't happen to reinforce your twisted view of reality. The facts being that those sworn statements did not in any way corroborate Ford's account of what she alleges happened to her. Deal with it.

Signed,
Disingenuous Prick

Post one account from any witness not named Judge or Kavanaugh that say that what Ford alleged did not happen. Just one. Not "I don't know", not "I don't remember" but "did not happen".

I'll be waiting, probably forever cause you got jack shit.
 
Reactions: jackstar7

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,735
28,908
136
An investigation seems silly, no true bottom line can be found. One person saying it happened, she's sure it was him that can't say who payed for her polygraph vs. a person with a feckless record and a friend that was at the supposed incident and says he has no recollection of such an event happening. Their isn't something here to investigate, there isn't a smoking gun piece of evidence. This isn't a trial, either. To me this is an obvious smear campaign to delay things.

But, it is interesting to see the Dems today argue for holding an alleged crime as a teenager against someone for all their life even if they've been a productive contributing citizen for decades since...
I say they are holding him responsible for lying about it
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,244
10,818
136
I didn't get busted over anything. You're the truly ignorant person here. You have little knowledge of the process, and little knowledge of history. You CLEARLY stated they didn't have subpoena power, the Senate DOES!!! FFS get that through your damn head.
Holy shit you a dumd and dishonest mother fucker. The Senate does, the minority party doesn't dumb shit.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,644
50,878
136
Why stop there...pack the court too. I'm sure you can find a way to rationalize that as well.

I agree! Court packing should definitely be done as well.

Conservatives aren’t great at understanding long term consequences. When you stopped playing by the rules you invite a response. You may not be happy when you get it but you have no one but yourselves to blame.
 
Reactions: jackstar7

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
8,126
5,151
146
I sure loved it when the GOP delayed Merrick Garland's nomination for nearly a year. Ahhhh, good times.

Wait, what were you complaining about? Oh right, the dirty democrats delaying Kavanaugh's nomination for a couple more weeks.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Holy shit you a dumd and dishonest mother fucker. The Senate does, the minority party doesn't dumb shit.

Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
From my understanding it’s a simple majority for both.

You're both wrong. Impeachment requires a simple majority in the HOR. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate regardless of the position of the accused.

Invoking the 25th amendment for permanent removal of a sitting president requires a 2/3 majority in both houses.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,644
50,878
136
You're both wrong. Impeachment requires a simple majority in the HOR. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate regardless of the position of the accused.

Invoking the 25th amendment for permanent removal of a sitting president requires a 2/3 majority in both houses.

Uhmm, we are talking about admitting new states, not impeachment.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,538
759
146
I sure loved it when the GOP delayed Merrick Garland's nomination for nearly a year. Ahhhh, good times.

Wait, what were you complaining about? Oh right, the dirty democrats delaying Kavanaugh's nomination for a couple more weeks.

And why would they complain? McConnell suggested to do just that in July.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!

Because Ford chose not to reveal herself until the accusation was leaked w/o her consent. Too easy, obviously.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,735
28,908
136
Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!
I believe Ford explained that. The information was not Feinstein's to share. You really should be shouting at the victim.

Riddle me this, what would have changed if the letter had been revealed one month earlier. The arguments would have been the same. It would have been, Ford is a liar and a Democratic conspiracy.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,644
50,878
136
You’re a fucking hack, and you still haven’t answered my questions. WHY DIDNT a FBI investigation request happen the moment the letter was RECEIVED!!!!!

Don’t fucking reply till you can answer it.

This has already been answered repeatedly.

Instead of ranting and foaming why don’t you simply admit you were wrong in the earlier discussion? You claimed you wanted an honest debate. Well, honest debate means admitting when you’re wrong.
 

ecogen

Golden Member
Dec 24, 2016
1,217
1,288
136
You’re a fucking hack, and you still haven’t answered my questions. WHY DIDNT a FBI investigation request happen the moment the letter was RECEIVED!!!!!

Don’t fucking reply till you can answer it.

When you gonna admit to being wrong about the Dems not asking for a subpoena?
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
This has already been answered repeatedly.

Instead of ranting and foaming why don’t you simply admit you were wrong in the earlier discussion? You claimed you wanted an honest debate. Well, honest debate means admitting when you’re wrong.

0 for 3 - keep it coming
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |