Elaborate. Please.Compare those statements with the stack of statements from far more credible people saying the opposite.
No one is more of a party have than most in this thread.
SO? If a girl accused you here on this forum that you raped her when she was just 10 years old, should we automatically believe her and assume you guilty? Again, anandtech forums is NOT a court, so should everyone consider you guilty and have your life ruined forever, over an accusation?We're not talking about a criminal trial. If your wife comes home and find you in bed with the maid she doesn't need to take you to court to decide you're a fucking adulterer.
SO? If a girl accused you here on this forum that you raped her when she was just 10 years old, should we automatically believe her and assume you guilty? Again, anandtech forums is NOT a court, so should everyone consider you guilty and have your life ruined forever, over an accusation?
I N C E L - F E V E R !
Innocent until proven guilty is how we maintain ourselves as a nation of laws. As a civil society.
To let the public destroy people without due process should, itself, be a crime.
Your hysterical opposition to such ideals is duly noted.
I don't like the gloating going on over at MSNBC.
Sure, Kavanaugh needs to be stopped simply because he is an very unhinged individual.
If anyone were in any sort of job interview and started acting as Kavanaugh acted in the committee, suggesting nonsense of conspiracy theories against him or her, the employer would pass on hiring.
Especially in todays world where unhinged people can often return with a gun.
But still, Kavanaugh and his chances appear to be coming to an end.
And democrats gloating about that just looks not good.
If anything reenergizes the republicans on the committee, it will be the democrats gloating.
This isn't over yet.
It doesn't look good, Kavanaugh's chances, but never say never.
And Trump, while he suddenly appears "reasonable", we all know Donald trump can flip on a dime.
Just hold the gloating. Instead, take a deep sigh of relief.
No one is more of a party have than most in this thread.
Well, there it is. Whenerver Oroo oroo takes any side of an argument it's bullshit.
I just love the way you guys go running to your leftist news sites, who are just as delusional as some of you. Kavanaugh will get confirmed and you'll have to get over it, or not. I have some of that ointment left.
No one is more of a party have than most in this thread.
Problem is, this isn't about ruining a person's life or his family's life. It's about deciding if that person is acceptable as a life long member of a very very small set of individuals who make major decisions in the nation at large. I don't give a fuck if Kav is doing well at his country club or gets dirty looks in church. That's his problem. It's our problem if he's a disreputable justice on the SCOTUS. If he's confirmed, I'm convinced he will be just that.SO? If a girl accused you here on this forum that you raped her when she was just 10 years old, should we automatically believe her and assume you guilty? Again, anandtech forums is NOT a court, so should everyone consider you guilty and have your life ruined forever, over an accusation?
Guilty until proven innocent is a concept, a norm, a standard, a principle! It's got nothing to do with what room you are in, whether its a court room or home room or internet room or whatever.
We as a society, as a people don't want and should not want people to be guilty if someone accuses them of something. In fact as a matter of critical thinking we should ALWAYS and in ALL cases be sceptical of accusations and wait for the facts and evidence to be able to determine more righteously and accurately.
You are clearly a solid lead dead weight jerk. Best you sink to the bottom of the deepest trench of the Pacific Ocean where you belong and leave us in peace.I want ALL of them to never forget that ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES!
You are clearly a solid lead dead weight jerk. Best you sink to the bottom of the deepest trench of the Pacific Ocean where you belong and leave us in peace.
STOP using GARBAGE, BULLSHIT, IDIOCY, RETARDATION, LIES, FAKENESS, ABSURDNESS, MENTAL FUCKING ILLNESS then!Problem is, this isn't about ruining a person's life or his family's life. It's about deciding if that person is acceptable as a life long member of a very very small set of individuals who make major decisions in the nation at large. I don't give a fuck if Kav is doing well at his country club or gets dirty looks in church. That's his problem. It's our problem if he's a disreputable justice on the SCOTUS. If he's confirmed, I'm convinced he will be just that.
In before this isn't a criminal trialInnocent until proven guilty is how we maintain ourselves as a nation of laws. As a civil society.
To let the public destroy people without due process should, itself, be a crime.
Your hysterical opposition to such ideals is duly noted.
This is a long thread, so I don't know if this has been brought up already. There are some things about Dr. Ford that make me a bit suspicious. She didn't just come up with her story when Kavanaugh was nominated. She had been following the trajectory of his career for a long time, way before the nomination. She told someone, something along the lines of; OMG, he could be selected for the Supreme Court someday and that it could not be allowed to happen. Since she had that opinion for many years, there would have been plenty of time for her to perfect her story and rehearse it for many years. Some people are capable of self hypnosis, to the point where they make themselves believe something. A .person who truly believes what they are saying would be difficult to find to be guilty of perjury. Maybe something did happen to her, I'm not discounting that. But...maybe she decided it was of some political importance to her to plug in a certain name, even if it was not the correct person. In her polygraph test, she was only asked two questions. Hmmm.
Some may ask, what would she have to gain? Even though she didn't ask for the gofundme, it's possible that she knew one would probably be created for her and the public who believed her would pour a lot of money into it. And...someone always has to take one for the team.
California? [check]
Liberal [check]
Political activist [check]
I see motives. Call me nuts, maybe I am, but I could find what I wrote plausible.
Problem is, this isn't about ruining a person's life or his family's life. It's about deciding if that person is acceptable as a life long member of a very very small set of individuals who make major decisions in the nation at large. I don't give a fuck if Kav is doing well at his country club or gets dirty looks in church. That's his problem. It's our problem if he's a disreputable justice on the SCOTUS. If he's confirmed, I'm convinced he will be just that.
I N C E L - F E V E R !
That whooshing sound.....Who from this thread has been nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court?
Unfortunately for you I did. Context does matter, she is a doctor of psychology, so her act of playing the innocent naif who knows nothing about how polygraphs work, or the science behind memory and trauma simply doesn't wash. Either she's profoundly dishonest, or she's profoundly unqualified for her job. Just the education and "training" for her job should have "triggered" her into a predicament where it would have been unavoidable long ago, never mind with her leftist politics, in the circles she swims likely radical feminist at that.
And no, false memories aren't random, in this case she was politically primed and motivated to replace certain memories with a convenient target. And this is a person who lies about being too afraid to fly when she does it all the time, convenient dishonesty is clearly not beyond her. And professional ethics, simply nonexistent, there is no way she doesn't know about polygraph, its literally psych 101, she went on the day of a funeral, and couldn't even remember who paid for it. This isn't a reliable person to be charitable.
And of course this entire concern from the left, this entire circus is completely disingenuous. If the new standard is any false accusation can derail anything, you've validated sharia law because there can be no justice under such a system. And why would a woman do this? The left expose themselves as the ultimate sexists when they do this because you wouldn't ask why would someone blow themselves up over their beliefs, they clearly do it all the time, and the fact is, feminism at its core is simply nothing more than a religion, and this is far less than dying for your beliefs, in fact its pure positive attention from the only people that matter her, and monetary gain to boot.
What is the plight of the false accuser? Well this is how mattress girl was treated long after her story fell apart.
http://www.artnews.com/2016/06/28/n...mes-emma-sulkowicz-its-2016-woman-of-courage/
http://archive.is/uGTPN
And this case proves that even for the oldest and most well known feminist organization, no amount of proof against a false accusation is enough, because as I said, its a religion.
It says everything about the left that they will go this far to defend their fringe values from a nominee who will protect the fundamental constitutional values they are attempting to erode at every turn.
Oh I wish for the days of bleeding heart liberals...You are clearly a solid lead dead weight jerk. Best you sink to the bottom of the deepest trench of the Pacific Ocean where you belong and leave us in peace.
You are a miserable failure, a moron. Get a brain and use it to actually GET A LIFE!
That whooshing sound.....