There was no failure there. The supposed failure is an artifact of the Republicans ramming Kavanaugh through the process before the American people could find out what a nutjob he is. The man spent tax dollars chasing Vince Foster's ghost. You're backing a lunatic.What is it about Feinstein knowing this information way before we did, that you don't understand. We are not members of congress. She sat on the information and failed to do what she should have done, which was to bring it into the light when she knew about it. Don't try and pin that failure on me. Democrats own it.
So much bullshit and raving...so concerned about Democrats.Again, this is pure bullshit. Ford's own friend wrote a letter to the senate committee that she hadn't been or seen Kavanaugh at any party whether she's been with Ford, herself or others. Ford said that there were 6-7 people at the party, if she and her friend were there as she said, that would leave 4-5 people more there, if you take out Kavanaugh and his friend Judge, then that leaves only 2-3 people at the party. If they were at that party there, she would have seen Kavanaugh there. You can't be at a party with 6 or 7 people and not be able to see them. So her friend basically did NOT corroborate her story. Neither of the supposed witnesses have corroborated her story!
So that is just the facts. There is ZERO evidence, ZERO proof that Kavanaugh did anything.
What I'm saying to you in the previous post, and you are intentionally ignoring it, is that even with NO evidence at all, no nothing, mere hours after the allegation, ALL you democrats said he's guilty and he shouldn't be confirmed because of it! And I've been watching you here, and other places literally from minutes to hours after the story broke, labeling his guilty with ZERO PROOF!
No one even knew if the story was true, there was no official confirmation that the story was even real, yet you collectivist just knew he was guilty! This is my issue with you! You were brainwashed by MSNBC and CNN that this is an evil scotus candidate, so all your arguments were: "he wants to make babies live, OMG he is evil". I've not seen anyone actually go into details on his rulings and his views on the constitution and attack him on that.You had NOTHING, until this wild accusation and ALL of you boarded the RETARD train and jumped on the guilty wagon! NO EVIDENCE, NO PROOF, NO NOTHING, YET HE WAS GUILTY IN YOUR MIND!
Now you are trying to justify this by absurd means, by insane means, saying its the room that counts if someone is innocent until proven guilty, otherwise it doesn't matter.
Will he overturn Roe vs Wade? No! Will he and other right leaning judges put limitations to it if they get the chance? You bet! The previous ruling way overreaching far and beyond. It didn't take into account any counter argument at all and gave a blanket check to even murders of seconds before the baby is born. That is hardcore! And the court voted 100% on party lines on that!
But hey, lets say Kavanaugh isn't confirmed, do you really think that would change anything? It won't change anything because there is no democrats in the USA that actually use facts and statistics anymore. You never oppose people on their policies, you oppose them purely on partisan lines! If Kavanaugh was a Obama nominee, you all would have loved him, Roe Wade or no!
We see the same thing over and over with you! Trump, Jeff Sessions, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Gina Haspel, etc... ALL you know is : "racist, sexit, bigot AND NOW rapist". That is your whole playbook! You've never gone after them on facts. You've never pointed to many of these people's terrible records and bad decisions in the past.
Look what's coming up on the SC dockets...That'll tell you all you need to know. No paranoia, facts.And how, exactly would Kavanaugh be able to do those things? Supreme Court Justices don't legislate. That's just paranoia on your part.
If that's the case why did Republicans try so hard to avoid FBI following up?An FBI agent said that he thinks the Dems are going to be disappointed because he doesn't see this investigation turning up anything different than what is already known.
Sanctuary cities are perfectly legal, illegals can't vote, and I'm not aware of illegals in appointed government positions so these concerns you have don't require you to jettison the Constitution to put to rest.Liberals are really convinced that conservatives are gunning for Roe V Wade. Not so. Most of them I know, while they do not personally support all aspects of abortion, are reasonable toward it, especially in the cases of rape, incest and the possibility that the child would be born with severe birth defects. Where we disagree, often times, is at what point in the pregnancy abortions should be allowed to be performed. Most of us consider abortion to be settled law.
Our concerns about having a liberal weighted court are about keeping the Gov. Jerry Browns of this world from creating sanctuary states, allowing illegals to vote and appointing illegals to government positions. We want judges who interpret things according to the law, not by their feelings or biases in situations.
Yeah, Kavanaugh really showed his fairness in his opening statement didn't he? Did you read my link above? Or do facts scare you?Liberals are really convinced that conservatives are gunning for Roe V Wade. Not so. Most of them I know, while they do not personally support all aspects of abortion, are reasonable toward it, especially in the cases of rape, incest and the possibility that the child would be born with severe birth defects. Where we disagree, often times, is at what point in the pregnancy abortions should be allowed to be performed. Most of us consider abortion to be settled law.
Our concerns about having a liberal weighted court are about keeping the Gov. Jerry Browns of this world from creating sanctuary states, allowing illegals to vote and appointing illegals to government positions. We want judges who interpret things according to the law, not by their feelings or biases in situations.
If a polygraph is administered to Kavanaugh we would know. Ford passed her'sAgain, this is pure bullshit. Ford's own friend wrote a letter to the senate committee that she hadn't been or seen Kavanaugh at any party whether she's been with Ford, herself or others. Ford said that there were 6-7 people at the party, if she and her friend were there as she said, that would leave 4-5 people more there, if you take out Kavanaugh and his friend Judge, then that leaves only 2-3 people at the party. If they were at that party there, she would have seen Kavanaugh there. You can't be at a party with 6 or 7 people and not be able to see them. So her friend basically did NOT corroborate her story. Neither of the supposed witnesses have corroborated her story!
So that is just the facts. There is ZERO evidence, ZERO proof that Kavanaugh did anything.
What I'm saying to you in the previous post, and you are intentionally ignoring it, is that even with NO evidence at all, no nothing, mere hours after the allegation, ALL you democrats said he's guilty and he shouldn't be confirmed because of it! And I've been watching you here, and other places literally from minutes to hours after the story broke, labeling his guilty with ZERO PROOF!
No one even knew if the story was true, there was no official confirmation that the story was even real, yet you collectivist just knew he was guilty! This is my issue with you! You were brainwashed by MSNBC and CNN that this is an evil scotus candidate, so all your arguments were: "he wants to make babies live, OMG he is evil". I've not seen anyone actually go into details on his rulings and his views on the constitution and attack him on that.You had NOTHING, until this wild accusation and ALL of you boarded the RETARD train and jumped on the guilty wagon! NO EVIDENCE, NO PROOF, NO NOTHING, YET HE WAS GUILTY IN YOUR MIND!
Now you are trying to justify this by absurd means, by insane means, saying its the room that counts if someone is innocent until proven guilty, otherwise it doesn't matter.
Will he overturn Roe vs Wade? No! Will he and other right leaning judges put limitations to it if they get the chance? You bet! The previous ruling way overreaching far and beyond. It didn't take into account any counter argument at all and gave a blanket check to even murders of seconds before the baby is born. That is hardcore! And the court voted 100% on party lines on that!
But hey, lets say Kavanaugh isn't confirmed, do you really think that would change anything? It won't change anything because there is no democrats in the USA that actually use facts and statistics anymore. You never oppose people on their policies, you oppose them purely on partisan lines! If Kavanaugh was a Obama nominee, you all would have loved him, Roe Wade or no!
We see the same thing over and over with you! Trump, Jeff Sessions, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Gina Haspel, etc... ALL you know is : "racist, sexit, bigot AND NOW rapist". That is your whole playbook! You've never gone after them on facts. You've never pointed to many of these people's terrible records and bad decisions in the past.
All that was missing was MS-13 which makes up 1% of the million known gangs in the US, that's the GOP for ya, always looking out for the 1%.Sanctuary cities are perfectly legal, illegals can't vote, and I'm not aware of illegals in appointed government positions so these concerns you have don't require you to jettison the Constitution to put to rest.
Ford got two questions...two. And she got them from someone who had no legal authority over her responses. A polygraph is not that difficult to pass. So, hell, hook Kavanaugh up and give him two questions as well. Fair is fair.If a polygraph is administered to Kavanaugh we would know. Ford passed her's
Sanctuary cities are perfectly legal, illegals can't vote, and I'm not aware of illegals in appointed government positions so these concerns you have don't require you to jettison the Constitution to put to rest.
He'd never allow it, he's far too privileged and entitled for such things.Ford got two questions...two. And she got them from someone who had no legal authority over her responses. A polygraph is not that difficult to pass. So, hell, hook Kavanaugh up and give him two questions as well. Fair is fair.
An FBI agent said that he thinks the Dems are going to be disappointed because he doesn't see this investigation turning up anything different than what is already known.
This is you being blatantly deceptive at absolute best. Ford's friend ACTUALLY has gone on record not remembering whether she was at the party with Kavanaugh. (In case there is any confusion she certainly had been with Ford at other parties over the years.) Over 30 years later its not surprising if you can't remember the details of what was for her personally an uneventful party at the time. Now she did also clarify she did not specifically remember Kavanaugh at any party, but if she did not know Kavanaugh particularly over 30 years later this is not surprising again. (Disregarding Ford's friend might have been drinking on top of this at any particular party.)Again, this is pure bullshit. Ford's own friend wrote a letter to the senate committee that she hadn't been or seen Kavanaugh at any party whether she's been with Ford, herself or others. Ford said that there were 6-7 people at the party, if she and her friend were there as she said, that would leave 4-5 people more there, if you take out Kavanaugh and his friend Judge, then that leaves only 2-3 people at the party. If they were at that party there, she would have seen Kavanaugh there. You can't be at a party with 6 or 7 people and not be able to see them. So her friend basically did NOT corroborate her story. Neither of the supposed witnesses have corroborated her story!
Brown just got a beat down on the Sanctuary city law in California, which was recently passed. A judge has ruled it unconstitutional. Did that news escape you?
What got struck down was the state fine on businesses cooperating with ICE. The sanctuary city laws are in place and ruled perfectly legal.Brown just got a beat down on the Sanctuary city law in California, which was recently passed. A judge has ruled it unconstitutional. Did that news escape you?
I'll bet he's talking about this,What ruling are you talking about?
Sanctuary cities are perfectly legal and any attempt to abolish them is a gross violation of the constitution. Forcing state law enforcement to enforce federal law is HUGELY unconstitutional.
Color me shocked that conservatives only care about states rights when it’s the right to do conservative things.
What got struck down was the state fine on businesses cooperating with ICE. The sanctuary city laws are in place and ruled perfectly legal.
Fair enough, but sanctuary cities are still perfectly legal in California. The state cannot compel cities to be sanctuary cities under this ruling.https://abc7.com/politics/oc-judge-rules-californias-sanctuary-state-law-unconstitutional/4356877/
Sounds like a bunch of charter cities didn't want to abide by shit they didn't condone or sign up for. Good!
I noticed that none of our conservative players will respond to this.More than 50% of Republicans said he should be confirmed even if the allegations are true. Think about how insane that is.
Like I said, one of our parties is sick.
If that's "cover", then people are stupid or the media is not doing enough to report the massive corruption going on.
An FBI agent said that he thinks the Dems are going to be disappointed because he doesn't see this investigation turning up anything different than what is already known.
Right on both counts. People generally are dumb, or just don't have the time to care about the details. And the media in this country is straight up Jerry Springer-esque garbage that just has talking heads from both sides repeat talking points with no challenge whatsoever. NPR tries, but mostly fails and invites obvious shills like Jonah Goldberg to opine. The BBC is fantastic, but has almost no influence in the U.S. The "liberal" and "failing" NY Times bends over backwards to both-sides everything.
Liberals are really convinced that conservatives are gunning for Roe V Wade.
Again, this is pure bullshit. Ford's own friend wrote a letter to the senate committee that she hadn't been or seen Kavanaugh at any party whether she's been with Ford, herself or others. Ford said that there were 6-7 people at the party, if she and her friend were there as she said, that would leave 4-5 people more there, if you take out Kavanaugh and his friend Judge, then that leaves only 2-3 people at the party. If they were at that party there, she would have seen Kavanaugh there. You can't be at a party with 6 or 7 people and not be able to see them. So her friend basically did NOT corroborate her story. Neither of the supposed witnesses have corroborated her story!