They missed the opportunity to take him down over his time in the Bush White House and he is not going to lose the votes he needs over beerghazi. If the FBI investigation doesn’t expose anything we don’t already know, he probably has the votes he needs.Why aren't Democrats going after perjury charges from the hearing? It's obvious he lied under oath.
Haven't seen that one, don't use twitter, link ?I bet once the week is over, the media will play along with the nonsense that an FBI investigation occurred. Hopefully I'm wrong, but they don't even want to call out the lies like Donnie's recent official statement on Twitter.
Haven't seen that one, don't use twitter, link ?
They missed the opportunity to take him down over his time in the Bush White House and he is not going to lose the votes he needs over beerghazi. If the FBI investigation doesn’t expose anything we don’t already know, he probably has the votes he needs.
They're desperately trying to figure out how to vote for him and keep face, Flake's leaving, so it's no concern for him.I'm referring to this one. It has been reported recently the FBI hasn't received new instruction. And where's Flake, Collins, Murkowski?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1046230634103025664
NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people. Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion. Please correct your reporting!
They're desperately trying to figure out how to vote for him and keep face, Flake's leaving, so it's no concern for him.
Booker for a brief moment exhibited a tenacity to force the release of those documents, and then nothingThat's because the GOP has withheld the pertinent documentation from that time period.
I'm seeing quite a bit of rationalization in conservative circles that admits Kav was not truthful but excuses it on the grounds that the questions were unfair/embarrassing.
They missed the opportunity to take him down over his time in the Bush White House and he is not going to lose the votes he needs over beerghazi. If the FBI investigation doesn’t expose anything we don’t already know, he probably has the votes he needs.
Booker for a brief moment exhibited a tenacity to force the release of those documents, and then nothing
I'm referring to this one. It has been reported recently the FBI hasn't received new instruction. And where's Flake, Collins, Murkowski?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1046230634103025664
NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people. Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion. Please correct your reporting!
Well let’s look at this from the perspective that conservatives have told us to look at it.They're desperately trying to figure out how to vote for him and keep face, Flake's leaving, so it's no concern for him.
Yeah, that lifetime pension won't be enough for him.Flake is trying to maintain a place in the political machinery of the GOP despite what the Teahadi crazies have done to him in Arizona. It's an issue of future prospects as a paid talking head, political consultant, lobbyist, think tank operative or whatever. If he votes against Kavanaugh he'll be dead to the people who can make that happen for him. I mean, Kee-rist. If none of that happens he'll have to work for a living.
Flake is trying to maintain a place in the political machinery of the GOP despite what the Teahadi crazies have done to him in Arizona. It's an issue of future prospects as a paid talking head, political consultant, lobbyist, think tank operative or whatever. If he votes against Kavanaugh he'll be dead to the people who can make that happen for him. I mean, Kee-rist. If none of that happens he'll have to work for a living.
LOL. I'm not from Poland.Dude democracy is being destroyed in YOUR country. Why won't you fight for it?
Oh yeah, you're really looking forward to right wing authoritarian rule and hope the US falls into the same trap. Poland's government is a shit show and you've been sold a bill of goods.
Where are you from then? BTW I think this is first time you've denied being from Poland despite being called out a couple of times from there being there.LOL. I'm not from Poland.
If there is no evidence, there is no evidence. What does it matter what room it is in? You know? There is no evidence to support Ford's story, therefore he should be confirmed if that is your primary issue with him.I have to agree with you. Senator Grassley should not rule Kavanaugh guilty of attempted rape based on failing to clear reasonable doubt. Nor should he be sentenced to jail for attempted rape.
Now since Senator Grassley is not a judge, this is not a court, and Kavanaugh is not on trial what’s your point?
Mediocre entitled white men who rage and cry when stressed, make threats, and lie in confirmation hearings about their teenage binge drinking do not deserve to be Supreme Court Justices.
Even if he is given the position he will not have earned it. It will be in effect a participation trophy albeit one with significant consequences for the rest of the country.
We have already established this is not true. (You can argue there is not enough evidence yet, but that is not the same thing, and there are of course additional accusations against Kavanuagh, plus clear evidence he did in fact lie regarding certain points in his testimony.) On top of that you clearly have not even done some of the basic research on the circumstances of Ford's claims, so you are really wasting all our time posting in this thread.If there is no evidence, there is no evidence. What does it matter what room it is in? You know? There is no evidence to support Ford's story, therefore he should be confirmed if that is your primary issue with him.
So far,according to a report I just heard on the news, the FBI hasn't even contacted Ford yet.
Okay, all of what you wrote are claims! Okay? None of it is evidence. Her stating stuff is NOT evidence.As noted, it would have been surprising if she remember the details of the party did given the circumstance, while Judge would have plausible motivation to lie if he simply didn't remember the event because he was so drunk.
There indisputably is circumstantial evidence in favor of her claims, including her discussing the assault years ago, naming Kavanaugh in relation to the assault specially to the Washington Post prior to him being nominated by Donald Trump as Supreme Court Justice (although admittedly once he clearly was one of the possible candidates), plus her polygraph results.
I don't see what what you expect to prove with your false claims other than a lack of concern with accuracy or your lack of personal integrity.
FTFY since they are crawling out of the woodworkdon't feed the trolls children...
You're simply outright factually mistaken here. At best there is a language issue here if you are from a foreign country, or you are simply clueless, or intentionally lying about this. We have established you do not know basic things about the case, or apparently even the definition of evidence. (Its not as strong as something like a video or eye witness to the actual assault, but on top of the polygraph when she has previously talked about this and what circumstances is relevant evidence in comparison to her only suddenly bringing the assault for the first time up once Kavanaugh was actually nominated as some people on the internet had basically claimed.)Okay, all of what you wrote are claims! Okay? None of it is evidence. Her stating stuff is NOT evidence.
You're simply outright factually mistaken here. At best there is a language issue here if you are from a foreign country, or you are simply clueless, or intentionally lying about this. We have established you do not know basic things about the case, or apparently even the definition of evidence. (Its not as strong as something like a video or eye witness to the actual assault, but on top of the polygraph when she has previously talked about this and what circumstances is relevant evidence in comparison to her only suddenly bringing the assault for the first time up once Kavanaugh was actually nominated as some people on the internet had basically claimed.)