imported_tajmahal
Lifer
- Jul 9, 2009
- 10,723
- 2,064
- 136
Yeah, "the devil's triangle" and "bouff" OOOHHH what lies, perjury, evil intent!And he did that knowing that perjury is a felony, and he knows how important it is for the judiciary.
LMAO
Yeah, "the devil's triangle" and "bouff" OOOHHH what lies, perjury, evil intent!And he did that knowing that perjury is a felony, and he knows how important it is for the judiciary.
You can't or won't post a couple of his so called lies. Yet you want people to think they're credible?And Trump lied and said they had free reign to investigate.
Wut ! You didn't hear that? that's right it was on the Fake News, so of course you didn't hear him say it.You can't or won't post a couple of his so called lies. Yet you want people to think they're credible?
If lying under oath doesn't matter, why put nominees under oath? Why bother having the hearings at all?You can't or won't post a couple of his so called lies. Yet you want people to think they're credible?
If lying under oath doesn't matter, why put nominees under oath? Why bother having the hearings at all?
Yeah, "the devil's triangle" and "bouff" OOOHHH what lies, perjury, evil intent!
LMAO
He could have said he didn't know, or couldn't recall. Still a lie, but not one that could be proved.I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..
Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
If he didn't utter the original lie that he was a virgin then the questions would be out of line. Kavanaugh opened that line of questioning.I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..
Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
He could have said he didn't know, or couldn't recall. Still a lie, but not one that could be proved.
I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..
Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..
Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
I'm not. I'm saying he's a lawyer and judge and should know that stating a blatant lie under oath should disqualify him from his appointment.I forgot where they got it from - but if it was something written by himself it would kinda be hard to deny knowing what it is, no?
either way, you too are encouraging him to lie under oath.
I'm in the general agreeance that his behavior during the testimony (and interviews) is what should condemn him. Just based on his general unprofessional behavior - let alone if he lied under oath or not.
However - The other items have no basis, facts, or real credibility. Everyone here drank in high school and college (well, 99% at least, we are talking about a nerd forum). Everyone here has also likely had one night where you blacked out or simply was unable to remember what happened the previous night. Thinking that a political figure is holier than thou is downright pathetic. If actions from when you were a kid growing up in life was grounds for not hiring you most people here would never be employed
"It is an euphemism, sir."I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..
Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
What do you mean so what? He admitted to drinking - that should be that, trying to ascertain whether or not he was ever blackout drunk without anybody recollecting a specific admission from Kavanaugh himself does not make him a liar.
Is this really what passes for a SCOTUS confirmation hearing now? Is this really what we want. You are actually now dismissing entirely the claims of Ford "So what" you said, and are focusing on college drinking habits. Holy shit.
Yes, exactly as stated.Wut ! You didn't hear that? that's right it was on the Fake News, so of course you didn't hear him say it.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/29/politics/trump-fbi-investigation-kavanaugh/index.html
Except that there were no lies. Nice try though, you can now start to compete in the ATP&N Special political Olympics.I would support a movement of not taking the oath from here on out.
Him lying under oath is what turned the tide on a lot of Kav's allies and old friends, but it's clear that it doesn't mean anything.
All norms gone.
Yes, exactly as stated.
"On Friday, the Senate Judiciary Committee formally requested the White House instruct the FBI to conduct a supplemental background investigation, saying it should probe "current credible allegations" against Kavanaugh.
Complying with the Senate's request, Trump directed the FBI Friday night to re-open its background investigation into Kavanaugh with the probe "limited in scope and completed in less than one week."
You left out this part, I wonder why...Yes, exactly as stated.
"On Friday, the Senate Judiciary Committee formally requested the White House instruct the FBI to conduct a supplemental background investigation, saying it should probe "current credible allegations" against Kavanaugh.
Complying with the Senate's request, Trump directed the FBI Friday night to re-open its background investigation into Kavanaugh with the probe "limited in scope and completed in less than one week."
"The FBI as you know is all over, talking to everybody ... " Trump told reporters Saturday in Washington on his way to a rally in West Virginia. "They have been all over it already. They have free rein to do whatever they have to do."
You have proof it was a lie? Proof he wasn't a virgin as stated? You get to compete against jackboot in the ATP&N Special political Olympics.If he didn't utter the original lie that he was a virgin then the questions would be out of line. Kavanaugh opened that line of questioning.
Since he did he was obligated to tell the truth. All he had to say that it was a sex act and he didn't want to go into details. No good but at least honest.
Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.
You have proof it was a lie?