Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

[Homerboy]

I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..

Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?

Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.

Yes. I do. Yes the public does. Yes, the COURT OF LAW (which this man is applying for the highest position within) does too!

 

[imported_tajmahal]

You left out this part, I wonder why...

"they have free rein to do whatever they have to do" ..........within the scope of the limited investigation, of course.

 

[cytg111]

You have proof it was a lie? Proof he wasn't a virgin as stated? You get to compete against jackboot in the ATP&N Special political Olympics.

I have proof you are an idiot, how about that, and as a consequence everything you spew....

 

[cytg111]

"they have free rein to do whatever they have to do" ..........within the scope of the limited investigation, of course.

Aaaaaaaaaaand theres the stupid.

 

[ElFenix]

kav lied when he claimed (5 times) that ford's other potential witnesses had all refuted her story. problem is, they didn't refute. they said they could not recall. being able to discern the difference between a refutation and an inability to recall seems to be something that you'd expect from a JP in North Bumblefuck, Texas, let alone a sitting federal judge and a nominee to the supreme court.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Kavanaugh stated under oath that he had never heard about the indecent exposure allegations before they were made public, but he was sending around text messages to friends about that allegations days earlier. Those text messages are direct evidence he lied under oath, but neither the Republicans nor the FBI made any attempt to get that evidence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna915566

He didn't know the exact allegation, but had heard reporters and old classmates had been contacted. That's why it's "suggest"

''Text messages suggest"

 

[cytg111]

He didn't know the exact allegation, but had heard reporters and old classmates had been contacted. That's why it's "suggest"

''Text messages suggest"

Aaaaaaaand more stupid... keep em coming taj

 

[soundforbjt]

"they have free rein to do whatever they have to do" ..........within the scope of the limited investigation, of course.

You sure you don't write for Fox ? If you spun any faster, you'd achieve orbit.

 

[cytg111]

You sure you don't write for Fox ?

Rejected from Fox .. thats when you know your DNA is a disease to your kind.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I have proof you are an idiot, how about that, and as a consequence everything you spew....

HomerJS made the claim it's a lie, i'm waiting for him to come up with the evidence or proof of his claim. He won't because there's no way in hell he can prove it. Just another lie out of many against Judge Kavanaugh.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Aaaaaaaand more stupid... keep em coming taj

Don't you even wonder why the story itself, the story as presented in here said "suggest" instead of prove? Or do you even know the difference?

 

[HomerJS]

Except that there were no lies. Nice try though, you can now start to compete in the ATP&N Special political Olympics.

People keep telling you, lying about the sex acts and you choose to just ignore. Why bother putting people under oath?

His roommate confirmed Kavanaugh discussed Devils Triangle as a sex act.

 

[zinfamous]

I'm in the general agreeance that his behavior during the testimony (and interviews) is what should condemn him. Just based on his general unprofessional behavior - let alone if he lied under oath or not.

However - The other items have no basis, facts, or real credibility. Everyone here drank in high school and college (well, 99% at least, we are talking about a nerd forum). Everyone here has also likely had one night where you blacked out or simply was unable to remember what happened the previous night. Thinking that a political figure is holier than thou is downright pathetic. If actions from when you were a kid growing up in life was grounds for not hiring you most people here would never be employed

Agree with the first part.

Second: first, he shouldn't be a political figure. Trump made him one. Second, it doesn't really matter that our younger selves are what they were. It's pretty clear, with regard to your first comment, that it is his history at that age that clearly informs and is current to his personality that resulted in his shameful display last week. This obviously isn't "what Brett did in High School, or College!" The ABA has long come out against this guy, recommending to the GOP that he should never be allowed to sit on any bench. These are supposed to be relatively temperate "nerds" that achieve a high level of respect in this field because of their long-repeated displays of professionalism, which generally means they didn't have the same type of lives that we did. But again, not everyone went through high school black out drunk, possibly raping everything with two legs but as long as "They didn't remember it!" it was OK...I mean, can we drop that?

The GOP has consistently ignored the recommendations of the very body that is in the best position to ascertain an individual's qualifications for sitting as a judge. This goes back to 2006 or so, long before any of us plebs knew anything about Kavanaugh. None of this is new information to the committees, political and non-political, that are responsible for these kind of positions. Mitch knew he was, and it's why he told Trump to stay away...now Mitch marches out like a little lap dog, claiming that it is an AFFRONT! to democracy that "the Dems!" are doing their...well, actual duty of informing the country of what we all knew about this rat bastard of a human!

Let's be clear: The GOP isn't angry about the democrats delaying their Mamon-anointed frat-fucker; they are angry that the Democrats are exposing what all of them already knew about this piece of shit. They are desperately trying to slide by appointing a clearly unqualified individual, with all of this known, disqualifying baggage, hoping that their base will never know that they actually hated this guy. Do what Trump does...OR ELSE!

Just the fact that this debate has been turned to us, suddenly fighting over an issue that had been long-settled by both dems and Reps years ago: An essentially bi-partisan understand that this guy is rat-filth and never deserves to be on SCOTUS. Us picking sides on this long-settled issue is just god-damn useless. It's what the GOP wants, and they desperately want to get away as appearing as the "good guys" here, after cravenly accepting this person that none of them like.

 

[HomerJS]

You have proof it was a lie? Proof he wasn't a virgin as stated? You get to compete against jackboot in the ATP&N Special political Olympics.

Well let's see. He claimed he was a virgin yet made a reference participating in a Devil's Triangle. How can both be true?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Well let's see. He claimed he was a virgin yet made a reference participating in a Devil's Triangle. How can both be true?

Because his definition of Devil's Triangle is that it's a drinking game? He's never denied drinking to excess.

 

[momeNt]

Just so we are clear, nobody believes Ford anymore, this is all about how he handled the false allegations. There has been a distinct pivot in the tactic on the forum.

It is not whether or not he is a sexual assaulter, it is about how well he handles false sexual assault allegations. That's apparently the new standard for confirmation hearings.

 

[Jhhnn]

Well let's see. He claimed he was a virgin yet made a reference participating in a Devil's Triangle. How can both be true?

Because he's an innocent choirboy and the treasurer or the 100 keg club, obviously.

 

[Homerboy]

Because his definition of Devil's Triangle is that it's a drinking game? He's never denied drinking to excess.

You really don't keep up with current events or follow along do you?

 

[Homerboy]

Just so we are clear, nobody believes Ford anymore, this is all about how he handled the false allegations. There has been a distinct pivot in the tactic on the forum.

It is not whether or not he is a sexual assaulter, it is about how well he handles false sexual assault allegations. That's apparently the new standard for confirmation hearings.

I still believe her. But that act is going to prove impossible to prove. What IS provable is his demeanor when questioned, his perjury etc.

 

[Jhhnn]

Just so we are clear, nobody believes Ford anymore, this is all about how he handled the false allegations. There has been a distinct pivot in the tactic on the forum.

It is not whether or not he is a sexual assaulter, it is about how well he handles false sexual assault allegations. That's apparently the new standard for confirmation hearings.

It's about lying. It's about highly partisan conspiracy theorizing. It's about McConnell changing the rules to slam Kavanaugh right down America's throat.

 

[ivwshane]

Just so we are clear, nobody believes Ford anymore, this is all about how he handled the false allegations. There has been a distinct pivot in the tactic on the forum.

It is not whether or not he is a sexual assaulter, it is about how well he handles false sexual assault allegations. That's apparently the new standard for confirmation hearings.

Just to be clear, you are talking out of your ass.

Its called wishful thinking and you are doing alot of it.

 

[zinfamous]

I have to admit - do people honestly expect a judge to say "Well, you see sir, it's a three-way gangbang intercourse activity in-which there are two males and 1 female"..

Does anyone honestly expect someone to say that on national television (being covered by every channel) and expecting a good result?

Not justifying lying here - but yeaaaah. Those types of questions are rather out of line IMO.

Someone should tell past Kavanaugh that, when he proposed that line of questioning (actually based on no evidence) to the Clinton scandal, when he was assisting Ken Starr. See, these are actually Kavanaugh's words, that he wrote, based on his life, and his personality....so it actually is kind of important.

If we are told that we must establish him as a credible sexual abuser and drunk, but aren't allowed to ask the very line of questioning that would credibly establish that--all of which, again, is based on the own man's words...then is it any wonder that democrats remain uninterested in the nonsense boundaries that the GOP tries to force onto any type of investigation?

 

[IJTSSG]

Kavanaugh stated under oath that he had never heard about the indecent exposure allegations before they were made public, but he was sending around text messages to friends about that allegations days earlier. Those text messages are direct evidence he lied under oath, but neither the Republicans nor the FBI made any attempt to get that evidence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna915566

Where are the texts?

 

[soundforbjt]

Where are the texts?

Wouldn't matter to you if they were tattooed on his forehead...
Good Job !

 

[umbrella39]

Wouldn't matter to you if they were tattooed on his forehead...
Good Job !

Exactly. There is a good reason why the person you quoted "lurked" for a long time here but made sure to UpVote all the posts from 1 or 2 particular members... Should have stayed in the background like a good little sock...