Why would people do that? He’s super unpopular and this is just further dragging down republicans for the midterms. He seems to be a pretty awful choice, picked primarily because Trump thinks he will enable his corruption. Smart to keep fighting that.
After all elections have consequences and I think we all want the Democrats to knock this next one out of the park for the sake of the country.
She’s beholden to her constituents though. Not random people who donate to a gofundme styled campaign. She has no obligation to them at all.What I think is hilarious is that she is calling it bribery. If telling a politician you will fund a challenge to replace them in office if they vote in ways you don’t like is bribery I would love to know what she considers $10k a plate fundraising dinners with a bunch of rich people.
She’s beholden to her constituents though. Not random people who donate to a gofundme campaign. She has no obligation to them at all.
The real question is what do her constituents think and is she listening to them?
OMG, He possibly maybe did something bad when he was a teen in high school.
He probably pooped in his diapers when he was a baby. We can't have that on the court system.
This is just another delay tactic by the Democrats. LOL what a joke.
Funny that you didn't quote what I was responding to when I mentioned how fucked up it is to support trolling.I'm not diverting at all. I was only responding to your post about the girl making an OK sign that you claim is trolling.
jackstar7 said: ↑
"It's fucked up that you support trolling in our national political processes."
I responded:
"And almost as fucked up as those supporting the protesters screaming in the balcony and interfering in our national political processes"
I disagree on all of these points. All.
She’s beholden to her constituents though. Not random people who donate to a gofundme styled campaign. She has no obligation to them at all.
The real question is what do her constituents think and is she listening to them?
Funny that you didn't quote what I was responding to when I mentioned how fucked up it is to support trolling.
Not funny, actually, nor surprising, you bankrupt turd.
Kavanaugh being unpopular is an undeniable fact so you are disagreeing with reality now? Haha.
If you don’t want the Democrats to take at least one house of Congress extreme partisanship has driven you insane. We have a situation currently where it appears reasonably likely that the president has engaged in significant criminal activity. Mueller can investigate Trump but the only people who can actually conduct oversight of Trump who he can’t fire are Congress and Republicans have refused to perform their constitutional duties here.
‘Is the president a criminal?’ is a question we should all want answered and Congressional Republicans aren’t just not answering it, they are actively working to obstruct anyone who tries. That should be all any sane person should need to know to vote only for Democrats in Congress until this stops.
Put country before party for once and do the right thing.
I think things like this only serve to undermine legitimate criticisms of this nominee. An allegation from 35 years ago, really?
You know you can be arrested without having broken a law, right?Should I just quote the entire thread for you? Go back and read it for yourself.
I would support mundane trolling ( which isn't against the law ) over disrupting a proceeding and breaking the law in the process.
Put together with his coaching of girls, it's not a great look.I think things like this only serve to undermine legitimate criticisms of this nominee. An allegation from 35 years ago, really?
Don’t know. Don’t really care. If she’s adhering to the will of the people who will be voting for her that is all that should matter.What percentage of her regular donations do you think come from her constituents?
Undeniable in whose world? Your opinion maybe and those on the left. If Kavanaugh was so deplorable how was he ever confirmed to the appeals court?
The Mueller probe is going on and I support allowing it to complete without interference from either party. If guilt is found then justice should be doled out IAW the law.
So far Trump has not been found guilty of anything. He may be in the future, and if so he should be held accountable. Not before though.
If there was anything there I would have expected it to surface before now. It's just too convenient to have it surface now, and it reeks of desperation, really. Maybe the guy is too conservative or whatever, but this is not going to do anything but damage the opposition's credibility in many eyes.Put together with his coaching of girls, it's not a great look.
And they sure held that up as some kind of qualification for the job.
I think things like this only serve to undermine legitimate criticisms of this nominee. An allegation from 35 years ago, really?
You know you can be arrested without having broken a law, right?
You know that's a thing, yes?
Undeniable in every world. There are many polls about Kavanaugh and he has support somewhere in the 30’s.
He likely can’t be found guilty, he’s the president. Republicans in Congress are actively working to obstruct the probe you say you want completed and no matter what, in the end if they find wrongdoing it will be up to Congress to act.
In addition, there looks to be an enormous amount of corruption going on in areas the probe doesn’t touch. For example we have people who hold no government position and who pay Trump hundreds of thousands of dollars influencing VA policy from the shadows. What do republicans do in response to this? Nothing, they enable it.
Country first. Party second. You don’t even have to worry about legislation you don’t like being passed. All you’ll get is desperately needed accountability.
Don’t know. Don’t really care. If she’s adhering to the will of the people who will be voting for her that is all that should matter.
Her approval ratings took a massive hit last month. From 56% to 35% and it seems to be related to the SCOTUS nomination. The side that is causing that hit is the one that will win her vote, regardless of this funding drive.
Nice opinion piece dude!
Both the process & the nominee reek of radical right wing partisanship. It was the same with Gorsuch. I'm confident that the GOP could nominate conservative jurists who could pass the traditional 60 vote hurdle. But they won't, of course, showing us just how radical they have become.
Are you disputing the facts presented? If so, which ones?