Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 65 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,619
8,072
136
What facts? She doesn't have any actual facts or anything to back up any claims.

The facts are you and your traitor pals are committing witness tampering, threatening a witness and refusing justice to the victim by not even allowing an investigation.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,728
2,075
136
Psychologist Elizabeth Loftus studies memories. More precisely, she studies false memories, when people either remember things that didn't happen or remember them differently from the way they really were. It's more common than you might think, and Loftus shares some startling stories and statistics, and raises some important ethical questions we should all remember to consider.

A TED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=PB2OegI6wvI
 
Reactions: IJTSSG

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,619
8,072
136
It’s kind of gross how quickly you guys denigrate the likely victims of crimes.

It’s just like accusations of racism. You admit they exist in the aggregate but literally every specific case you decide is some money grabber trying to get paid. It’s disgusting.

No they're proud of it.. and they call themselves the finest people. You can see them smiling ear to ear and being proud of their nazi heritage.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,607
4,668
136
Other then her time travel from 2012 to 2018 so she could gather future info for lying to her therapist and husband

As previously stated there is a corroborating witness. FBI needs to question Mark Judge. If Kavanaugh is telling the truth nothing will come of it. However if Ford is telling the truth...

Why are you people so afraid of Judge being questioned by the FBI??

I don't have any problems with questioning.

I didn't say this was a lie on her part or that she has a time machine.But so far there are no "facts"other than he said she said.

I guess since Judge and PJ have both backed Brett Kavanaugh it would be more fitting to say She said They said.
 
Last edited:

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,619
8,072
136
You lie again. There are witnesses. A teenage girl doesn't go to a party with strangers ALONE!
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,728
2,075
136
You lie again. There are witnesses. A teenage girl doesn't go to a party with strangers ALONE!
You mean this witness that Ford claimed was there?

"Patrick J. Smyth attended Georgetown Prep — an all-boys school in North Bethesda, Maryland — alongside Kavanaugh. Both men graduated in 1983. Smyth signed a letter this summer, before the allegations against Kavanaugh were made public, testifying that Kavanaugh “is singularly qualified to be an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court,” along with dozen other of the school’s alumni.

Eric Bruce, who is representing Smyth, authored a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the committee. CNN has obtained a copy of the letter, which includes a quote from Smyth denying seeing any “improper conduct” from Kavanaugh.

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have.”

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/19/pj-speaks-alleged-witness-ford-assault-says-no-dice/

So once again contrary to Ford's claim we have yet another person saying they weren't there and never saw Judge Kavanaugh act in such a way.
 
Reactions: IJTSSG

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,619
8,072
136
What do you expect him to do? Own up to it and ruin his career?

Do you see Weinstein owning up to it despite mountains of evidence?

Do you see Trump owning up to it despite being caught on video?

All that you've shown everyone so far is you'll believe a denier rather than facts.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,625
28,755
136
You mean this witness that Ford claimed was there?

"Patrick J. Smyth attended Georgetown Prep — an all-boys school in North Bethesda, Maryland — alongside Kavanaugh. Both men graduated in 1983. Smyth signed a letter this summer, before the allegations against Kavanaugh were made public, testifying that Kavanaugh “is singularly qualified to be an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court,” along with dozen other of the school’s alumni.

Eric Bruce, who is representing Smyth, authored a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the committee. CNN has obtained a copy of the letter, which includes a quote from Smyth denying seeing any “improper conduct” from Kavanaugh.

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have.”

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/19/pj-speaks-alleged-witness-ford-assault-says-no-dice/

So once again contrary to Ford's claim we have yet another person saying they weren't there and never saw Judge Kavanaugh act in such a way.
All these people need to be questioned by the FBI so their stories hold legal weight.

Lying to the press ain't a crime according to a Trump lawyer.
 

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
813
80
91
Why should an investigation hold up the voting process when they didn’t make this an issue back in July when Feinstein knew? They already invited her to speak but if she declines that should be on her and maybe she should file a police or FBI report if she wants an investigation so it won’t hold up the voting process? Or is the investigation and the fact that it’s requested last minute purposely to hold up the voting process?
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,521
15,402
136
Why should an investigation hold up the voting process when they didn’t make this an issue back in July when Feinstein knew? They already invited her to speak but if she declines that should be on her and maybe she should file a police or FBI report if she wants an investigation so it won’t hold up the voting process? Or is the investigation and the fact that it’s requested last minute purposely to hold up the voting process?

Is there a reason why there shouldn't be an investigation?
 

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
813
80
91
Is there a reason why there shouldn't be an investigation?

There should have been one and no one has stopped her from filing a report with the appropriate authorities for an investigation. She has never done that but she can still do that. But why should the investigation hold up the voting process when Feinstein knew since July and Ford had way more time to file the report?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,521
15,402
136
There should have been one and no one has stopped her from filing a report with the appropriate authorities for an investigation. She has never done that but she can still do that. But why should the investigation hold up the voting process when Feinstein knew since July and Ford had way more time to file the report?

You didn't answer the question. If you think there should have been an investigation earlier than surely the reasons for that investigation don't simply disappear because of time.
 

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
813
80
91
You didn't answer the question. If you think there should have been an investigation earlier than surely the reasons for that investigation don't simply disappear because of time.

I did and never suggested it disappear with time, but don’t think it’s fair for it to hold up the voting process given how this was brought up last minute. She should proceed with requesting the investigation and it should be done though. Ford and Kavanaugh should also speak under oath to Congress as well.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,607
4,668
136
The facts are you and your traitor pals are committing witness tampering, threatening a witness and refusing justice to the victim by not even allowing an investigation.

Where did I do or promote any of those things. All I am saying is her saying something doesn't constitute a fact. But at this time all we have is she said x and he said y...

I don't know why she doesn't want to cooperate in the hearing. Or why the letter was sat on for several months. Some things just don't add up imo.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,607
4,668
136
You lie again. There are witnesses. A teenage girl doesn't go to a party with strangers ALONE!

Who are the witness'. The only one I know of is Judge who says he doesn't remember anything of the sort...

Never mind I see where one other "PJ" was identified and made a written statement to back up Brett Kavanaugh.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,607
4,668
136
What do you expect him to do? Own up to it and ruin his career?

Do you see Weinstein owning up to it despite mountains of evidence?

Do you see Trump owning up to it despite being caught on video?

All that you've shown everyone so far is you'll believe a denier rather than facts.

Again, What Facts are these you speak of?
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,521
15,402
136
I did and never suggested it disappear with time, but don’t think it’s fair for it to hold up the voting process given how this was brought up last minute. She should proceed with requesting the investigation and it should be done though. Ford and Kavanaugh should also speak under oath to Congress as well.

How is it being held up? Anita hills investigation lasted about two weeks. What would happen if the hearing was delayed for two weeks? What if it was delayed for three months? What exactly would be the issue? What would be the consequences of those delays? A more informed Congress? How exactly would that be a bad thing?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,625
28,755
136
Why should an investigation hold up the voting process when they didn’t make this an issue back in July when Feinstein knew? They already invited her to speak but if she declines that should be on her and maybe she should file a police or FBI report if she wants an investigation so it won’t hold up the voting process? Or is the investigation and the fact that it’s requested last minute purposely to hold up the voting process?
If you go by the Anita Hill precedent, reopening the background check would take a few weeks max. If Kavanaugh is innocent it won't change a thing.

Ford wanted to keep her anonymity that's why DF didn't raise it. When the info was leaked Ford finally gave her permission to reveal.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,625
28,755
136
Again, What Facts are these you speak of?
Background checks are fact finding missions. We have allegations and the facts need to be discovered.

There is the possibility some facts were not discovered by the earlier background checks. Remember Rob Porter used to work in the White House?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,535
50,718
136
Who are the witness'. The only one I know of is Judge who says he doesn't remember anything of the sort...

Never mind I see where one other "PJ" was identified and made a written statement to back up Brett Kavanaugh.

There is now at least one other person who says they heard about it contemporaneously.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,535
50,718
136
The real thing here is that Republicans don’t give a shit about sexual assault and we all know it. The president has been credibly accused by more than a dozen women of sexually assaulting them and he’s caught on tape bragging about it. What have Republicans in Congress done about the fact that the president is an admitted sex offender? Nothing.

So with Kavanaugh stop pretending you give a shit about it. You don’t and we all know it.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
The real thing here is that Republicans don’t give a shit about sexual assault and we all know it. The president has been credibly accused by more than a dozen women of sexually assaulting them and he’s caught on tape bragging about it. What have Republicans in Congress done about the fact that the president is an admitted sex offender? Nothing.

So with Kavanaugh stop pretending you give a shit about it. You don’t and we all know it.
And Democrats have danced around the Kennedy’s and Bill Clinton for decades. Let’s all stop pretending this is about sexual assault and call it for what it truly is, control and power.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,535
50,718
136
Just read another very good point. If she’s lying, why is she asking for an FBI investigation that would surely involve interviewing her? Why would someone volunteer to expose themselves to federal felony charges?

Conservatives, in your heart you know she’s probably right. Don’t put party over country yet again. Remember you are Americans first, Republicans second.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,535
50,718
136
And Democrats have danced around the Kennedy’s and Bill Clinton for decades. Let’s all stop pretending this is about sexual assault and call it for what it truly is, control and power.

You already tried this tack and when the very recent example of Al Franken was brought up you hand waved it away. There’s no reason for me to address this again because it’s already been refuted. The #bothsides-ing really needs to stop.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |