I'll say it for the third time, did you read her letter to Diane Feinstein? Answers to some of your questions are in there. Read it a note the detail.
I'll say it for the third time, did you read her letter to Diane Feinstein? Answers to some of your questions are in there. Read it a note the detail.Where/when did Ford say she sought treatment?
Where's the video she "claims" to have? Why hasn't she released it?Yeah, not like being a wife beater or anything. Amirite?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/19/keith-ellison-accuser-releases-2017-medical-docume/
Now you're attacking the victim and making demands, how despicable.Where's the video she "claims" to have? Why hasn't she released it?
That particular answer isn't in the letter in regards to seeking medical help at the time or if she was referring to the mental health help she received 24 years later. If it happened at the time then it would be possible to look at medical records with her permission.I'll say it for the third time, did you read her letter to Diane Feinstein? Answers to some of your questions are in there. Read it a note the detail.
Not attacking, asking a valid question.Now you're attacking the victim and making demands, how despicable.
You are correct that part is unclear. However having her mouth clamped shut was in the letter. He needs to read it.That particular answer isn't in the letter in regards to seeking medical help at the time or if she was referring to the mental health help she received 24 years later. If it happened at the time then it would be possible to look at medical records with her permission.
Got it, her hem was too short.Now throw in a much drunker Booker attempting that same scenario. You think a drunk teen in that situation will understand the fine line between socially expected pressure VS the use of force? I don't expect they would be in any capacity to make those decisions.
A teenage girl went to a party with multiple teenage boys. They were apparently all drunk. What does one expect that outcome to be?
No, I don't get the outrage. Particularly since they had the good sense to stop before they harmed her. Hell, go to an airport. The TSA will molest her just as much.
I hope she decides to testify under oath in front of the committee.Republicans who have grown confident that Ford would not appear may have gotten the cart before the horse.
I hope she decides to testify under oath in front of the committee.
I'll say it for the third time, did you read her letter to Diane Feinstein? Answers to some of your questions are in there. Read it a note the detail.
Now throw in a much drunker Booker attempting that same scenario. You think a drunk teen in that situation will understand the fine line between socially expected pressure VS the use of force? I don't expect they would be in any capacity to make those decisions.
A teenage girl went to a party with multiple teenage boys. They were apparently all drunk. What does one expect that outcome to be?
No, I don't get the outrage. Particularly since they had the good sense to stop before they harmed her. Hell, go to an airport. The TSA will molest her just as much.
A teenage girl went to a party with multiple teenage boys. They were apparently all drunk. What does one expect that outcome to be?
That's news to me. Did she even claim to be bruised?
What is your comment on her details of the incident as she saw it?Got it Wonder when that medical treatment was, and WHAT it was. Sure would shed light on the situation...
The woman who has accused Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexual assault has told the Senate Judiciary Committee, in an apparent bid to jump-start negotiations, that she “would be prepared to testify next week,” so long as senators offer “terms that are fair and which ensure her safety,” according to an email her lawyers sent to committee staff members.
In the email, obtained by The New York Times, the lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford said that testifying Monday — the timetable Republicans have set for a hearing — “is not possible and the Committee’s insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event.” The lawyer reiterated that it is Dr. Blasey’s “strong preference” that “a full investigation” occur before her testimony — wording that stopped short of demanding an F.B.I. probe and suggested she is open to testifying without one.
I question her memories as being accurate. I've posted links to the science of why.What is your comment on her details of the incident as she saw it?
That didn’t take long. Now GOP needs to make sure it is a fair and open forum.
There were a couple of issues in her letter that I found somewhat contrived, but i'm not going to trivialize what she wrote.What is your comment on her details of the incident as she saw it?
That didn’t take long. Now GOP needs to make sure it is a fair and open forum.
Looks like a great way to continue to reveal what utter assholes those Republican senators are. Maybe we’ll see them use the ‘What did se expect’ defense on camera.That didn’t take long. Now GOP needs to make sure it is a fair and open forum.
While she did mention the drunken state of a couple or few people in the letter, she made absolutely no comment on her own sobriety. It seems a reasonable question.Looks like a great way to continue to reveal what utter assholes those Republican senators are. Maybe we’ll see them use the ‘What did se expect’ defense on camera.
He can say he didn't do it all he wants. He is either a pathological liar or the world's second biggest idiot. His first words at his nomination announcement were:
"Throughout this process, I have witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the American judiciary.
No president has ever consulted more widely or talked with more people from more backgrounds to seek input about a supreme court nomination. Mr. President, I am grateful to you, and I’m humbled by your confidence in me."
I remember the ass-kissing letter Gorsuch had to write to Trump in order to keep his nomination from being pulled on the grounds of “insufficient loyalty”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...e-letter-to-president-trump-after-scotus-nom/
It's time for term limits here..