Why? He's qualified and he'd make an excellent Justice.If Republicans gave a shit about our country, Kavanaugh wouldn't even have been considered.
What's the matter? Your little scenario about Kavanaugh slipping? Getting desperate? Feel like crying?Year of the cockroach is over .. go back into hiding scumbag.
Another leftist crying out for violence and death............... nothing new since the baseball field.Repubs denied Obama this seat. Its war.
Another leftist crying out for violence and death............... nothing new since the baseball field.
The logical and smarter line of attack against Kavanaugh was the perjury charges.If Republicans gave a shit about our country, Kavanaugh wouldn't even have been considered.
So are other people, why not pull an unpopular choice and nominate someone with no "problems"?Why? He's qualified and he'd make an excellent Justice.
You think that's not coming back around?The logical and smarter line of attack against Kavanaugh was the perjury charges.
The Dems better get on with it then because once Kavanaugh is on the bench there ain't no way he will ever be impeached.You think that's not coming back around?
Certainly goes to attack his credibility in answering the charges by Ford.
I smell Manafort sweat on you .. you really ought to bathe more.
Say taj, you be a short man too? Thats why you identify with Trump?
Of course. Well, if you think beating back women's fight for equality is a good thing. If you think that ruling to further enable the financial elite at the expense of the common man is a good thing.Why? He's qualified and he'd make an excellent Justice.
As I noted if you read the whole post, unless you are taking the position that Keyser did not choose to lie, this statement is misleading. All Keyser basically said is while she believes Ford's account is accurate, her memory of an event over 30 years is not good enough to verify any of the details of the party at this point.If anyone can connect Kavanaugh to Dr. Ford, it would be her. If Ms. Keyser were to affirm Dr. Ford’s account, then it would be over for Kavanaugh. She has chosen not to.
As I noted if you read the whole post, unless you are taking the position that Keyser did not choose to lie, this statement is misleading. All Keyser basically said is while she believes Ford's account is accurate, her memory of an event over 30 years is not good enough to verify any of the details of the party at this point.
Other than a lack of concern for accuracy, I am not sure what you are trying to prove with this misleading claim. Her lifelong friend did back believing her story, she simply clarified she did not have sufficient memories of what was an uneventful party at this point. Depending on what Ford said, she may have believed over 30 years later that Keyser was more familiar with Kavanaugh over 30 years later (an attempted rape by someone would tend to make someone stick in someone's mind personally speaking) but that's the only relevant detail. Its not clear Keyser even assumed this knowledge in the first place since conceivably Keyser could have noticed something about the party even if Ford did not actually say anything at the time, although obviously if she did notice something she does not remember it now.The testimony currently stands at 4 to 1. Including her "life long friend".
As is being currently reported:
"Simply put," attorney Howard Walsh said, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."
Keyser has no recollection of being at a party with Kavanaugh present, which is problematic if Dr. Ford recalls Keyser being at the party when the assault occurred.
Dr. Ford identitifed who was at the party. If none of the identified eyewitnesses are able to verify that the party even happened, what then?
So, four people won't corroborate her story, including Kavanaugh, or four people perjured themselves.
As noted, what is required even for a criminal conviction is not as strong as you seem to think it is. Basically as noted most people can't remember who was at a party over 30 years ago if nothing eventful happened as far as they knew at the time, so the fact 3 people either can't remember (or in the case of particularly Judge possibly lying about it) that would not seem surprising. Its worth noting someone else who would have been likely to have been at the parties in question may still be able to step forward and confirm that they definitely do remember at least one party where Ford and Kavanaugh were definitely both at it.As is being currently reported:
"Simply put," attorney Howard Walsh said, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."
Keyser has no recollection of being at a party with Kavanaugh present, which is problematic if Dr. Ford recalls Keyser being at the party when the assault occurred.
Dr. Ford identified who was at the party. If none of the identified eyewitnesses are able to verify that the party even happened, what then?
As is being currently reported:
"Simply put," attorney Howard Walsh said, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."
Keyser has no recollection of being at a party with Kavanaugh present, which is problematic if Dr. Ford recalls Keyser being at the party when the assault occurred.
Dr. Ford identitifed who was at the party. If none of the identified eyewitnesses are able to verify that the party even happened, what then?
The woman in question Any Chua denied she coached women on how to appeal to Kavanaugh's desire to have clerks who look like models.Looks like Kavanaugh has a history of objectifying women. I did wonder why his clerks were all so attractive. Lawyers are actually not any more attractive than normal americans... yet kavanaugh seems to pick em.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/20/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-yale-amy-chua
'No accident' Brett Kavanaugh's female law clerks 'looked like models', Yale professor told students
The woman in question Any Chua denied she coached women on how to appeal to Kavanaugh's desire to have clerks who look like models.
Looks like Yale students are calling out Amy for lying. More evidence Kavanaugh ain't the reformed choir boy people are claiming
Yale Students To Prof Who Denies Coaching Kavanaugh Clerks: You’re Lying
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...lerks-youre-lying_us_5ba685dde4b069d5f9d369e6
Why not? They tried to get a pedophile into the Senate. These people don't care.It all seems to fit the pathology of a sexual offender.
GOP wants to nominate their own Harvey Weinstein to the supreme court.