Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 159 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
And is this why you'd prefer the FBI didn't investigate him? Presumed partisanship and therefore automatic guilty evidence?
No, I see no reason whatsoever to only have the FBI investigate. There are plenty of other groups that could. Why are you insisting it only be the FBI?
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,175
5,641
146
You don't give an f' about men or women, you only care about the fetuses. It's a convenient thing to care about as fetuses impose no burden and will never impose a burden on your personal self.

I doubt he gives a fuck about anything other than his immediate personal well being. Why you respond to him when he has never discussed any of these topics in good faith, I don't know.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,607
12,733
146
No, I see no reason whatsoever to only have the FBI investigate. There are plenty of other groups that could. Why are you insisting it only be the FBI?
Great, so should we have a multiple-pronged investigation on this? What happens if we have conflicting investigation results? What's the explanation when either Republicans, Democrats, or constituents start asking why we're even considering a SCJ nominee that's got multiple branches/groups investigating them?
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,302
144
106
If Trump tweets tonight that Kvanaugh is still his guy....tomorrow's vote is going to be be "must see TV"
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
He hasn't done any of it. Only the shithole Democrats have done it.People like you.

I didn't say he was guilty of Ford's accusations at all. If you look at today's testimony squarely it's obvious he's the partisan hack the GOP has been pretending he isn't. And a very entitled one, too.

Nobody is irreplaceable. He seems to think that he is. That it's his turn, or something.
 
Reactions: darkswordsman17

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Not even the same ballpark. Long Dong Silver? I like big breasts and I cannot lie??who put the pubes on my Coke? He never assaulted anyone...he was accused of creating a toxic work environment.
We'll never know his full background. And he rarely writes or speaks to make certain no one digs in on him.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Great, so should we have a multiple-pronged investigation on this? What happens if we have conflicting investigation results? What's the explanation when either Republicans, Democrats, or constituents start asking why we're even considering a SCJ nominee that's got multiple branches/groups investigating them?
Have at it, it should have been ongoing for 2 months now. Too bad the Democrats hid the information.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Sen. Lee is pointing out that the Democrats haven't even participated in the Senate investigations and interviews. Somehow it's Judge Kavanaugh's fault though.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,570
7,631
136
LOL he just claimed that he and others wrote "Renate Alumnius" in their yearbook because they wanted Renate Schroeder to feel like she was part of their friends group. Can you imagine being stupid enough to believe that it isn't a brag about having been part of a large group that have had sex with her?

For the record, Renate Schroeder withdrew her endorsement of Mr. Kavanaugh and said she felt humiliated.

This guy just lies and lies and lies.

God, that's the part. His absolute and categorical denial of anything and everything.
Yet some parts are SO damn obvious and corroborated by others.
And this... "Renate Alumnius" part I cannot buy. It makes perfect sense that they are bragging and smearing her.

For him to claim otherwise is incredulous.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,782
1,540
126
Sen. Lee is pointing out that the Democrats haven't even participated in the Senate investigations and interviews. Somehow it's Judge Kavanaugh's fault though.

Ask yourself, what are Republicans arguing? DO they believe in FBI investigations? Do they believe in putting people under oath? Do they believe in interviewing corroborating witnesses? It seems odd Republicans are arguing against investigations. Law and Order party indeed.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
No, I see no reason whatsoever to only have the FBI investigate. There are plenty of other groups that could. Why are you insisting it only be the FBI?
However, had the Left really wanted an FBI investigation, they would have requested one a couple months ago when they first got Ford's allegation. Instead they used Ford as an unwitting pawn, publicly releasing her allegation against her expressed desire for anonymity, intentionally doing so as a deliberate and contrived delay tactic if all else fails at the 11th hour. Weasels have more integrity than these slimy bastards.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
This guy will be lucky if he can get a job at McDonalds after this hearing.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
Ask yourself, what are Republicans arguing? DO they believe in FBI investigations? Do they believe in putting people under oath? Do they believe in interviewing corroborating witnesses? It seems odd Republicans are arguing against investigations. Law and Order party indeed.

Uhmm, have you missed the last two years? Trump associates are getting locked up left and right and all Republicans can do is scream about how the investigating should stop.

They are fine with investigations, just not investigations of republicans.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,505
27,801
136
However, had the Left really wanted an FBI investigation, they would have requested one a couple months ago when they first got Ford's allegation. Instead they used Ford as an unwitting pawn, publicly releasing her allegation against her expressed desire for anonymity, intentionally doing so as a deliberate and contrived delay tactic if all else fails at the 11th hour. Weasels have more integrity than these slimy bastards.
^This talking point sounded stupid the first time it was uttered and still sounds stupid. Where are the 100k pages of documents that were requested upfront?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
It’s weird that people think the reason why this information came out matters in the slightest. It is either worthy of investigation or it is not. We all know it is.

It’s interesting to see who the real ‘slimy weasels’ are, and it’s the people who think that we shouldn’t investigate this because it might keep Republicans from doing what they want politically.

Don’t want investigations into sex crimes? Don’t nominate people with histories of sex crimes.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Ask yourself, what are Republicans arguing? DO they believe in FBI investigations? Do they believe in putting people under oath? Do they believe in interviewing corroborating witnesses? It seems odd Republicans are arguing against investigations. Law and Order party indeed.
I don't see it that way.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,425
8,388
126
It’s weird that people think the reason why this information came out matters in the slightest. It is either worthy of investigation or it is not. We all know it is.

It’s interesting to see who the real ‘slimy weasels’ are, and it’s the people who think that we shouldn’t investigate this because it might keep Republicans from doing what they want politically.

Don’t want investigations into sex crimes? Don’t nominate people with histories of sex crimes.

the republicans were so shocked that the democrats competently played politics for the first time in decades that they had to cry foul
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |