Dont forget about the chemtrails that turn frogs gay.. or was it tranny, forget.
You mean Deep State corruption like at the FBI, etc? And leaking of information and documents such as was done by Pelosi's staff?
I agree.
Wait, are you saying Hillary and Bill are not corrupted and criminal? Are you really saying that? Are you dumb, ignorant or a troll?
Because I actually disagree with Bernie Sanders MORE than with Hillary Clinton, but he would have been a much better candidate because he is at least MOSTLY honest and isn't nearly as corrupt as Hillary. Most of Washington is corrupt, not all, but most, so is Bernie, but he is like a child compared to Hillary.
She is wicked, lying, twisted, corrupt, criminal, dishonest, opportunistic, etc...
Bernie might be 100% ignorant, but at least he is mostly honest, at least he believes in what he says, he is way less corrupt than most of Washington, etc...
To say that Hillary Clinton is not corrupt or criminal is just a joke!
You nailed it and in the absence of anything real they'll make shit up.So what do Democrats have for November?
1) Collusion?
2) Kavanaugh?
or 3) no Clue?
I vote for #3.
The left doesn't give a shit. From the time they released their first stateent that di
You nailed it and in the absence of anything real they'll make shit up.
But, Hillary, jr.
lol.
Hillary Derangement Syndrome. lol
She really gets the emotional set all frothy with rage:
I love that conservatives ascribe super powers to her. Otherwise how do you have 25 years of partisan investigations and yet no charges? She must be a diabolical genius super villain!
Man, you really are a case. And cut out this bullshit trying to personally attack me, you're out of line with that shit.You really are a dumb moron, aren't you? Did you read that I disagree with Brett's rulings and his interpretations of the 4th and 5th amendment? I don't like him to be confirmed you dumb moron! DUMB MORON! DUMB MORON! Get that through your head! I don't think he is a good pick, imbecile! Get that retard? Get that moron?
I have an issue with dumb morons like you who just because he is nominated by a republican you label him as guilty because of a wild accusation and you push this fake feminazi bullshit how we should automatically believe all accusers, which is really dumb and retarded, this is how it was in the past 300+ years ago and guess what? Every person was a fucking slave that could be put in a dungeon at the whim of the powerful! Dumb idiot.
There is no evidence against him, no proof, and he is innocent until proven guilty. If you don't want his nomination argue with the facts, with his rulings, not this fake bullshit and wild accusations!
I'm FORCED TO DEFEND Bret Kavanaugh because of dumb morons, dumb retards, dumb imbeciles, dumb brainless turds like you! Instead of allying with people like me, with independents, libertarians, classical liberals, constitutionalists, objective people, you fight with us and push all this FAKE bullshit, rather than agreeing with us that Bret is a bad candidate because of his previous rulings and writings!
AGAIN THIS IS WHY TRUMP WON AND WILL WIN AGAIN IN 2020 IF YOU CONTINUE THIS IDIOCY! People don't want to hear your DEMOCRATIC PARTY BULLSHIT! The democratic party has less than 45 million registered voters. Republicans also have similarly low numbers, they have about 35 registered voters.
But when you argue against Trump, against Jeff sessions, against Bret with BULLSHIT, that pisses non partisan people off, you get additional 30 million people to vore for a Trump like person!
So keep going this way you imbecile and keep loosing if you want! Or you can get a brain and ally with people like me and lets tackle bad choices, bad policies with facts and statistics and evidence!
Here's something from this year. More relevant wouldn't you agree?Kavanaugh has been opposed long before this debacle:
The American Bar Association had concerns about Kavanaugh 12 years ago. Republicans dismissed those, too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...?utm_term=.233fbc93fedc&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1
"
But in May 2006, as Republicans hoped to finally push Kavanaugh’s nomination across the finish line, the ABA downgraded its endorsement.
The group’s judicial investigator had recently interviewed dozens of lawyers, judges and others who had worked with Kavanaugh, the ABA announced at the time, and some of them raised red flags about “his professional experience and the question of his freedom from bias and open-mindedness.”
“One interviewee remained concerned about the nominee’s ability to be balanced and fair should he assume a federal judgeship,” the ABA committee chairman wrote to senators in 2006. “Another interviewee echoed essentially the same thoughts: ‘(He is) immovable and very stubborn and frustrating to deal with on some issues.’”
A particular judge had told the ABA that Kavanaugh had been “sanctimonious” during an oral argument in court. Several lawyers considered him inexperienced, and one said he “dissembled” in the courtroom."
I wouldn't expect anything less from you, comrade.Here's something from this year. More relevant wouldn't you agree?
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/aba_kavanaugh_testimony/
I wonder if Judge Kavanaugh's fourth grade report card is available. The left could take a week to dissect that and make some shit up.
Even more recent...yesterdayHere's something from this year. More relevant wouldn't you agree?
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/aba_kavanaugh_testimony/
I wonder if Judge Kavanaugh's fourth grade report card is available. The left could take a week to dissect that and make some shit up.
I wonder if ERs will see an increase in boof related admissions this weekend as the torch is passed to a new generation of assholes?Alright guys, I'm going to go boof real quick.
Guilty until proven innocent is a concept, a norm, a standard, a principle! It's got nothing to do with what room you are in, whether its a court room or home room or internet room or whatever.
Anyone surprised by this? I knew it was coming the second Grassley uttered the words limited scope.Unreal.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...vestigation-allegations-against-brett-n915061
White House limits scope of the FBI's investigation into the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh
The FBI has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, a White House official confirmed to NBC News.
Color me surprised.Update: Trump just lied and said the FBI has free reign in the investigation on his way to the helicopter to a rally in WV.
LOL you guys thought the FBI was a non-partisan law enforcement agency?
Wrong. It's just another enforcement arm of the Republican party, like Border patrol.
FIVR speaks for himself, not me.Great conspiracy ideas you have there, pal. You guys have always denied that the FBI was partisan, but now that the Kavanaugh investigation is only supposed to take a week, instead of forever, until after 2020, as you'd like, you make a nutter post like this. Hahaha!
The FBI is hardly friendly to Trump, and this investigation gives them ample opportunity to go digging. I expect they will discover what we already know. Ample leads willing to characterize Kavanaugh as a dude bro frat boy, which he lied about, but unable to corraborate sexual assault.Great conspiracy ideas you have there, pal. You guys have always denied that the FBI was partisan, but now that the Kavanaugh investigation is only supposed to take a week, instead of forever, until after 2020, as you'd like, you make a nutter post like this. Hahaha!
I expect they will discover what we already know. Ample leads willing to characterize Kavanaugh as a dude bro frat boy, which he lied about, but unable to corraborate sexual assault.
White House limits scope of the FBI's investigation into the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh
Great conspiracy ideas you have there, pal. You guys have always denied that the FBI was partisan, but now that the Kavanaugh investigation is only supposed to take a week, instead of forever, until after 2020, as you'd like, you make a nutter post like this. Hahaha!