Entertainment?
How could a captive animal provide entertainment?
-John
Captive humans can provide entertainment. That would be a captive animal.
:awe:
All in the eyes of the captors, [un]fortunately.
But in all seriousness, to what extent does "captive" mean here?
Domestic animals are captive, are they not? Is there no entertainment to be found from pets?
Entertainment can also come in many forms. Tricks are one way, but another is awe, a sense of wonderment. At least, I consider myself entertained when I am awe-struck.
Am I saying it is right? Well, depends.
I don't find keeping wild animals in zoos to be wrong, but orcas deserve better facilities.
But to play devil's advocate and take that to the next level - what about zoos in general? The very concept is terrible and wrong. We are merely playing to our own image of superiority by taking animals from around the world and confining them to very small, moderately-themed walled confinement.
It's why captivity for most species results in shorter lifespans. I guarantee their is mental stress results in physiological stress which plays havoc on the body over the long term. Otherwise there is just no physical reason for a shorter lifespan, especially considering nature is far more brutal and unforgiving than confinement. Food can be far more nutritious in confinement for animals yet often they fail to live as long of a life as they are capable of, on average.