Originally posted by: Zero001
Notice the andHis proposal calls for giving any woman going to an abortion clinic the $500 option, to be paid no more than 30 days after the baby is born and given up for adoption.
So not only do they have to give birth to the child, but they also have to give them up for adoption?
$500 is ridiculous. How do you put a price on a person? This is wrong in so many levels.
Originally posted by: mugs
Do you people REALLY think people are stupid enough to spend 9 months pregnant for a one-time $500 payment?
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Texas wants to pay women 500 bucks if they change their mind about getting an abortion, hoping they'll have the kid and just give it up for adoption instead.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/23/texas.abortion.reut/index.html
This is ridiculous. Who's going to think to themselves "Hmm, well, I really don't want to have a kid, but I DO really want a new Prada bag...." Texas is the most effed up place on the planet, I swear
Originally posted by: mugs
Do you people REALLY think people are stupid enough to spend 9 months pregnant for a one-time $500 payment?
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Texas wants to pay women 500 bucks if they change their mind about getting an abortion, hoping they'll have the kid and just give it up for adoption instead.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/23/texas.abortion.reut/index.html
This is ridiculous. Who's going to think to themselves "Hmm, well, I really don't want to have a kid, but I DO really want a new Prada bag...." Texas is the most effed up place on the planet, I swear
One idiot lawmaker proposes a bill, which hasn't been voted on btw, and you declare all of Texas to be "the most effed up place on the planet"? I'm sure I could find proposed legislation from New Hampshire that I could use to call you an idiot too.
Wait until if/when the bill passes before you go shooting your mouth off.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: moshquerade
The only one who comes out looking stupid in this is the "mother" who takes the bait.
No I think republicans do as well.
Think of all the money the state will get to spend on idiots that think... well if I get knocked up and give the kid up thats a "easy" $500. Then all these kids go to state care after no one adopts them. Long run people that live in Texas pay a lot more in taxs for this republicans idiotic idea.
As bctbct said...
"Cool, Texas will likely eat the cost of 10k per kid born in the hospitals that many of these moms wont/cant pay.
Serves Texas right for sending us Bush.
Texans, get your wallets out. "
so, you're opposed to the fact that welfare pays (poor) women to have (fatherless) babies?
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: moshquerade
The only one who comes out looking stupid in this is the "mother" who takes the bait.
No I think republicans do as well.
Think of all the money the state will get to spend on idiots that think... well if I get knocked up and give the kid up thats a "easy" $500. Then all these kids go to state care after no one adopts them. Long run people that live in Texas pay a lot more in taxs for this republicans idiotic idea.
As bctbct said...
"Cool, Texas will likely eat the cost of 10k per kid born in the hospitals that many of these moms wont/cant pay.
Serves Texas right for sending us Bush.
Texans, get your wallets out. "
so, you're opposed to the fact that welfare pays (poor) women to have (fatherless) babies?
No I have no problem with welfare. It should limited, but I would never want a child to suffer. I just dont think this guy is realizing he how much more burden he is sholving on his fellow Texans.
I do have a problem with providing incentives to have a baby to prevent aborting fetuses.
Just another case of Republicans reducing gov't. (haha) and advancing their religious beliefs.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: moshquerade
The only one who comes out looking stupid in this is the "mother" who takes the bait.
No I think republicans do as well.
Think of all the money the state will get to spend on idiots that think... well if I get knocked up and give the kid up thats a "easy" $500. Then all these kids go to state care after no one adopts them. Long run people that live in Texas pay a lot more in taxs for this republicans idiotic idea.
As bctbct said...
"Cool, Texas will likely eat the cost of 10k per kid born in the hospitals that many of these moms wont/cant pay.
Serves Texas right for sending us Bush.
Texans, get your wallets out. "
so, you're opposed to the fact that welfare pays (poor) women to have (fatherless) babies?
No I have no problem with welfare. It should limited, but I would never want a child to suffer. I just dont think this guy is realizing he how much more burden he is sholving on his fellow Texans.
I do have a problem with providing incentives to have a baby to prevent aborting fetuses.
Just another case of Republicans reducing gov't. (haha) and advancing their religious beliefs.
Why do you WANT the fetuses to be aborted? You have something against fetuses?
As an atheist I don't even understand why abortion is a religious issue. It should be an ethical issue, centered on what we consider to be human.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Texas will recoup any payments made under this plan quite easily by tacking it onto the fee's they're charging to folks eager to adopt healthy infants.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: moshquerade
The only one who comes out looking stupid in this is the "mother" who takes the bait.
No I think republicans do as well.
Think of all the money the state will get to spend on idiots that think... well if I get knocked up and give the kid up thats a "easy" $500. Then all these kids go to state care after no one adopts them. Long run people that live in Texas pay a lot more in taxs for this republicans idiotic idea.
As bctbct said...
"Cool, Texas will likely eat the cost of 10k per kid born in the hospitals that many of these moms wont/cant pay.
Serves Texas right for sending us Bush.
Texans, get your wallets out. "
so, you're opposed to the fact that welfare pays (poor) women to have (fatherless) babies?
No I have no problem with welfare. It should limited, but I would never want a child to suffer. I just dont think this guy is realizing he how much more burden he is sholving on his fellow Texans.
I do have a problem with providing incentives to have a baby to prevent aborting fetuses.
Just another case of Republicans reducing gov't. (haha) and advancing their religious beliefs.
Why do you WANT the fetuses to be aborted? You have something against fetuses?
As an atheist I don't even understand why abortion is a religious issue. It should be an ethical issue, centered on what we consider to be human.
if they were to tack on $500 "extra" dollars to adopt that is chicken feed considering what it actually does cost altogether.Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Texas will recoup any payments made under this plan quite easily by tacking it onto the fee's they're charging to folks eager to adopt healthy infants.
And then people will not adopt in Texas being that there is 49 other states let alone other countries that would be cheaper.
Same thing that has happened in Detroit. Business leaves they need more money they raise fees and such. Now fees are high so more business leaves. They raise fees again to get back. Now they start asking why do businesses not want to come here... DUH.
Again this is standard republican idiots. Of course its coming from Texas.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: moshquerade
The only one who comes out looking stupid in this is the "mother" who takes the bait.
No I think republicans do as well.
Think of all the money the state will get to spend on idiots that think... well if I get knocked up and give the kid up thats a "easy" $500. Then all these kids go to state care after no one adopts them. Long run people that live in Texas pay a lot more in taxs for this republicans idiotic idea.
As bctbct said...
"Cool, Texas will likely eat the cost of 10k per kid born in the hospitals that many of these moms wont/cant pay.
Serves Texas right for sending us Bush.
Texans, get your wallets out. "
so, you're opposed to the fact that welfare pays (poor) women to have (fatherless) babies?
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Texas wants to pay women 500 bucks if they change their mind about getting an abortion, hoping they'll have the kid and just give it up for adoption instead.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/23/texas.abortion.reut/index.html
This is ridiculous. Who's going to think to themselves "Hmm, well, I really don't want to have a kid, but I DO really want a new Prada bag...." Texas is the most effed up place on the planet, I swear
Topic Summary: Think twice and maybe you can afford a new PS3 or something
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
This also has a very Third World feel to it.