I will take that whoosh over an altered state of reality any day. I am out of this one. You guys have successfully redefined pro-socialism, anti-communism and anti-communism as conservatism. Congratulations are in order.
Another Whoosh.
I will take that whoosh over an altered state of reality any day. I am out of this one. You guys have successfully redefined pro-socialism, anti-communism and anti-communism as conservatism. Congratulations are in order.
Frank Zappa - Hot Plate Heaven at the Green HotelI will take that whoosh over an altered state of reality any day. I am out of this one. You guys have successfully redefined pro-socialism, anti-communism and anti-communism as conservatism. Congratulations are in order.
You realize that you're trying to engage in revisionist history and redefine the nazis in the face of what the majority of the experts think, right?
It's either an amazing display of delusion or an amazing display of balls to then accuse everyone else of doing exactly what you're trying to do.
http://mises.org/daily/5765/Hitlers-EconomicsIn the 1930s, Hitler was widely viewed as just another protectionist central planner who recognized the supposed failure of the free market and the need for nationally guided economic development. Proto-Keynesian socialist economist Joan Robinson wrote that "Hitler found a cure against unemployment before Keynes was finished explaining it."
What were those economic policies? He suspended the gold standard, embarked on huge public-works programs like autobahns, protected industry from foreign competition, expanded credit, instituted jobs programs, bullied the private sector on prices and production decisions, vastly expanded the military, enforced capital controls, instituted family planning, penalized smoking, brought about national healthcare and unemployment insurance, imposed education standards, and eventually ran huge deficits.
I posted what Hitler stood for:
If he was running for President you would probably vote for him.
Yeah and then the silly guy started testing out al kinds of weapons during the Spanish Civil War, mass production, started doing crazy speed and a secret Master Race thing in the background and ran around killing people nonstop.
Sounds a bit like what ISIL trying to promote atm, they just aren't as slick about it as coverage of events happening in real time are a lot better tha they were back in the day.
Yeah and then the silly guy started testing out al kinds of weapons during the Spanish Civil War, mass production, started doing crazy speed and a secret Master Race thing in the background and ran around killing people nonstop.
Sounds a bit like what ISIL trying to promote atm, they just aren't as slick about it as coverage of events happening in real time are a lot better tha they were back in the day.
You realize that you're trying to engage in revisionist history and redefine the nazis in the face of what the majority of the experts think, right?
It's either an amazing display of delusion or an amazing display of balls to then accuse everyone else of doing exactly what you're trying to do.
You are out of your mind. I am defining the Nazis by exactly what they claimed they stood for. It's well documented. They are anti-capitalism, pro-socialism and anti-communism. If you think that is conservatism more than liberalism then it's you that is engaging in revisionist history and redefining the Nazis.
No troll thread.
Was Henry Ford a progressive too?Whats funny is progressives supported eugenics back in Hitler's day. Look up Planned Parenthood.
Oh so you mean like when you read "majority of scholars identify Nazism in practice as being a far-right" and take that as gospel when in fact they are self proclaimed as being pro-Socialism and hated capitalism and even called themselves the National Socialist German Workers' Party?
Ya, I am the one just reading things and not thinking about them.
Would you buy the home in the opening post? Maybe put your childs baby bed in joseph goebbels office?
They were National Socialists, which means that the socialism extended only to "good Germans." All others were to be exploited, killed, or both.Other than the fact that they were scary and killed a lot of Jews it seems like you really don't know anything about the Nazis. They were *not* a socialist party in any way, shape or form.
Whats funny is progressives supported eugenics back in Hitler's day. Look up Planned Parenthood.
They were National Socialists, which means that the socialism extended only to "good Germans." All others were to be exploited, killed, or both.
Absolutely not.
What is heritage? Where is the line between heritage and hate?
That house is part of German history. Should it be torn down, or preserved like some of the southern plantation homes?
Thomas Jefferson owned slaves. What kind of shape is Monticello in?
Nazism arose as Germany was in a deep depression. It did not arise out of a high-minded attempt to regulate the economy, it was simply pitting rich against poor for political gain. The poor were unhappy with their circumstances and the Nazis gave them a scapegoat: The rich. That scapegoat later became the Jews, homosexuals, the institutionalized, and the Gypsies.
This is conservatism.
He seemed to like kids
Last time I went there it looked pretty good.
Of course, Jefferson didnt gas millions of slaves, so if you have to ask where the line is, I think thats it right there.
I respectfully disagree. That is not conservatism, that is classic bleeding heart liberalism.
To blame someone else for your problems is liberalism.
It is not your fault you are in jail, you are product of your upbringing.
It is not your fault you got a junk degree, the bankers are keeping you down.
Occupy wall street - if you have time to sit around, you have time to look for a job.
You still have not answered the question, would you buy the home?
You do know he and his wife killed their children?
The line between heritage and hate is how many people died?
Says the guy who constantly whines about how oppressed he is.
Says the guy who proudly proclaims "it is legal" in his defense of heinous acts.
So tell us, since what Joseph did was legal at the time, you would buy the home wouldn't you?
Which direction does your moral compass point?
Whine some more, you shitbag troll.
Would you buy the home?
To quote Matthew Modine, my comments and questions are a reflection of the duality of man.
At the root is the question why do we think the way we do?