Lakeside home for sale

[thraashman]

Says the guy who proudly proclaims "it is legal" in his defense of heinous acts.

I'm unaware of giving women the right to control their own bodies being considered a "heinous act" in any culture other than fundamentalists Islamic. Now treating women like slaves or property like groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIL do, that's a heinous act. Sounds pretty much exactly like your beliefs Texashiker

 

[Texashiker]

I'm unaware of giving women the right to control their own bodies being considered a "heinous act"

Call it whatever you want, does not change the facts that women are allowed to kill an unborn child.

Just as it was legal to slaughter jews, so is it legal to kill unborn children.

To avoid such conflicts align yourself with the universal truth to do no harm. Whether born, unborn, jew, black, asia,,,, do no harm.

 

[Orignal Earl]

To avoid such conflicts align yourself with the universal truth to do no harm. Whether born, unborn, jew, black, asia,,,, do no harm.

Lot's of your posts are so out there they actually hurt me

 

[Bowfinger]

Call it whatever you want, does not change the facts that women are allowed to kill an unborn child.

Just as it was legal to slaughter jews, so is it legal to kill unborn children.

To avoid such conflicts align yourself with the universal truth to do no harm. Whether born, unborn, jew, black, asia,,,, do no harm.

So says the guy who is happy to send Central American children back to die. Hypocrite.

 

[smackababy]

So says the guy who is happy to send Central American children back to die. Hypocrite.

They are just going to die here if we don't send them back anyway! Albeit, in a manner far further away (in time) and far less painful.

 

[MixMasterTang]

My thoughts for the day.

If I were a conservative I would never post in a T.H. thread because to be associated with him in any way should discredit their opinion immediately.

If I were a liberal I'd never attempt to argue with T.H. or the other conservatives in this thread because it's extremely clear that they are all either trolls or delusional enough that no matter what you say or evidence you present they won't accept as truth.

If I was not an American I would be laughing at how stupid americans are and how horrible at separating fact, fiction and opinion.

And to answer T.H.'s original question that he seems to keep repeatedly asking people (even though 95% of the question he has been directly asked he has ignored): No I would not buy that house.

 

[thraashman]

Call it whatever you want, does not change the facts that women are allowed to kill an unborn child.

Just as it was legal to slaughter jews, so is it legal to kill unborn children.

To avoid such conflicts align yourself with the universal truth to do no harm. Whether born, unborn, jew, black, asia,,,, do no harm.

But you're arguing like crazy to force harm upon women in favor of something that does not even live. And you're trying to connect Hitler to the view opposing you while very directly agreeing with the views of fundamentalist Islamists and slavers. You're the one arguing to make women's rights illegal, just like it was legal for slave owners to beat their slaves and it's legal in fundamentalist Islamic societies for men to subjugate women.

 

[Moonbeam]

Lot's of your posts are so out there they actually hurt me

Remember that TH is a highly moral person, obsessed with the notion that people should act virtuously, that they should all have a moral compass guiding them. This is a good thing, no? The only problem is that TH is also an ignorant bigot and doesn't have the slightest idea of what is actually moral. He worships the concept but has no conception that he doesn't get the details, doesn't actually know what morality really is. He has a moral compass that always points north but the needle is frozen in place. If he follows the direction it points he can follow it and walk in circles. You see that here.

 

[Texashiker]

No I would not buy that house.

Thank you for the answer.

You're the one arguing to make women's rights illegal, just like it was legal for slave owners to beat their slaves and it's legal in fundamentalist Islamic societies for men to subjugate women.

So you want to bring rights into the discussion?

Did Germany, as a sovereign nation, have the right to pass and enforce its own laws?

Remember that TH is a highly moral person, obsessed with the notion that people should act virtuously, that they should all have a moral compass guiding them. This is a good thing, no?

Yes, your moral compass should point to the universal truth to do no harm.

The only problem is that TH is also an ignorant bigot and doesn't have the slightest idea of what is actually moral. He worships the concept but has no conception that he doesn't get the details, doesn't actually know what morality really is.

It is a simple concept, an idea that humanity is slowly moving towards, and that truth is to do no harm.

He has a moral compass that always points north but the needle is frozen in place. If he follows the direction it points he can follow it and walk in circles. You see that here.

The compass is frozen because universal truths do not change.

 

[MrPickins]

I know I'm late to the party, but I was under the impression that blatant trolling was not allowed on P&N...

 

[Texashiker]

I know I'm late to the party, but I was under the impression that blatant trolling was not allowed on P&N...

There is no trolling here.

We are addressing complex social questions that a lot of people shy away from.

If you find the topic "unsettling", then please move along.

 

[fskimospy]

There is no trolling here.

We are addressing complex social questions that a lot of people shy away from.

If you find the topic "unsettling", then please move along.

I think maybe I'll report you for trolling instead.

 

[thraashman]

There is no trolling here.

We are addressing complex social questions that a lot of people shy away from.

If you find the topic "unsettling", then please move along.

No, I think the overwhelming consensus here is that you're trolling... and an idiot.

 

[Texashiker]

I think maybe I'll report you for trolling instead.

Funny how when you start losing the debate you resort to name calling and threats.

Did you ever answer the question? Would you buy the home in the opening post?

You are a stance defender of vial acts in the legality, so why not buy the home? Raise a family, go swimming in the lake, throw some parties.

No, I think the overwhelming consensus here is that you're trolling... and an idiot.

To reconsider your firmly held opinions can make one uncomfortable.

 

[MrPickins]

Admit it, my threads get more traffic than average.

And car wrecks get more attention than smoothly flowing traffic.

That doesn't make them desirable.

 

[Cozarkian]

It looks like a beautiful property. I think I would turn it into a summer camp and maybe a hotel retreat the rest of the year with a small museum that accepts donations for a Jewish charity.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I saw this article a couple of weeks ago, and have been debating on whether or not to start a thread on it.

So here goes.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ar-Berlin-goes-sale-left-rot-two-decades.html

For liberals this may be a none issue. After all, slaughtering jews was legal at the time. Morals and values aside, as long as it was legal, right? But for civilized people, who you want to own a home with such a "rich" history?

Such a place would probably be best preserved as a museum, or national monument, or maybe bulldoze the house and make a part out of the land? But a home to have children in?

At a good price would you consider buying this lakeside home?

I could see some of the liberal members of the forum who like to hide behind the shield of law buying the house. What Goebbels did was legal. So there should be no issue.

I just could not imagine my kids or grandkids being in a house that harbored so much hate. When hate becomes law, what are people supposed to do?



Placed in P&N because of the political overtone and political history.

You are a pathetic, petulant piece of shit.

And grammatically, it's "non-issue" not "none-issue" you ignorant fuck

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I think maybe I'll report you for trolling instead.

Already done. Some of th's threads have some merit in P&N, this is pure troll-bait from the fucktard.

 

[Texashiker]

Already done. Some of th's threads have some merit in P&N, this is pure troll-bait from the fucktard.

Lots of insults, no answers.

It is a simple question, would you buy the home? Maybe turn it into a daycare for children?

Those who defend vial acts "because its legal" should have no issue with buying the home.

 

[Bowfinger]

So says the guy who is happy to send Central American children back to die. Hypocrite.

Speaking of not answering the question. TH runs from his hypocrisy again.

 

[thraashman]

And car wrecks get more attention than smoothly flowing traffic.

That doesn't make them desirable.

Good analogy.
Texashiker is P&N's traffic accident.

 

[Texashiker]

Speaking of not answering the question. TH runs from his hipocracy again.

We did not create the train wreck in central and south america, but we are supposed to pay for it?

Good analogy.
Texashiker is P&N's traffic accident.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinking

When kids are in school they are told there is one correct answer. I prefer divergent thinking. Break through the idea that there is a single right answer.

I like to think there are multiple right and multiple wrong answers to a question.

With the house in the opening post I do not see a single right or wrong answer. As there are multiple rights and wrongs.

 

[surfsatwerk]

I saw this article a couple of weeks ago, and have been debating on whether or not to start a thread on it.

So here goes.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ar-Berlin-goes-sale-left-rot-two-decades.html

For liberals this may be a none issue. After all, slaughtering jews was legal at the time. Morals and values aside, as long as it was legal, right? But for civilized people, who you want to own a home with such a "rich" history?

Such a place would probably be best preserved as a museum, or national monument, or maybe bulldoze the house and make a part out of the land? But a home to have children in?

At a good price would you consider buying this lakeside home?

I could see some of the liberal members of the forum who like to hide behind the shield of law buying the house. What Goebbels did was legal. So there should be no issue.

I just could not imagine my kids or grandkids being in a house that harbored so much hate. When hate becomes law, what are people supposed to do?



Placed in P&N because of the political overtone and political history.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6JewWEzEl4

 

[Orignal Earl]

We did not create the train wreck in central and south america, but we are supposed to pay for it?

The US caused lot's of train wrecks in central and south america

 

[Victorian Gray]

You do know he and his wife killed their children?

Yes I do. He and his wife still liked kids.