Tigers have always been superior, and this thread proves it unequivocally.
It just shows how ignorant people are now days:
1. Lacking education or knowledge.
2. Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant mistake.
3. Unaware or uninformed.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ignorant
It seems, you full-fill all the above.
The tiger is not and will never be the King of the beast, since he must attain this title by trials and tribulations.
* Tigers are not social, he has nothing that resembles a Kingdom, as lions have Prides.
* Tigers being loners will be frequently chased off by, wolves, hyenas, wild dogs, and bears, dispicable for a monarch.
* Lions have a anatomy (Mane) that resembles a kings crown, tigers only have moton chops.
* Prides can take down earths largest bull mega faunas, hippo, rhino, elephant, the tiger being solitary doesnt have the muscle.
* The lion like nobel kings are, honest, brave, leneint, while the tiger is cruel, savage and unforgiving.
* 1 on 1 the lion whips the tiger on average, rare incidents of luck (motos such as) he may have shot jessie james, but he aint no Jessie james, in other words, King.
The lions genus, Panthera leo, has attained the title King of the beast, because like Kingdoms, they have control over a vast amount of land, the lion has ruled for 2,000 years on and was indegenous to 3 continents, europe, africa and asia, even pre-historically on america:
The tigers range has been supressed by the lion, halted and controlled around the borders of eurasia, and indias breaching to africa, guns the main down fall of lions gave the tiger a better chance to move more south towards the indian sub-continent. The lion has ruled any and every where the tiger has, from near the caspian sea down to gujurat, the same cannot be said of the tiger, since hes entire genus comprimises only that of asia, in that sense, tigers rule over nothing.
Imperial courts, to dynastys, armorys, totems, honorary statuses of government, royal kingdoms and hierarchy the lion reigned supreme as the highest ranked animal specifcally over the tiger when compared. So in
-Biblical records the lion is the uncontested ruler over the tiger.
-In Royal courts, kingdoms and government socioty, the lion is held higher in rank over the tiger.
-The scientifical communitys of ecology and biology, the lion is more powerful and supreme in almost all land ownership and prowess of earth while the tiger isolated and inferior.
-The sprirtual world the lion is at a greater significance and authority from dietys to gods.
-In archaeology blood sports of human made settings, arenas, aphitheaters, pit fights, the lion came out the victor through artifacts consistancys.
-In the atheism world of modern appliable documentation, via videos, and newspapers the lion still has beatin the tiger more than vice versa.
Clearly theres no animal more used in heraldry than the lion. The GEO (famous german science magazine) has examined which animal is used how many times in heraldry for each continent (in general). These were the results (black=big cats):
Lion dominated 5 continents in healdry. (Afrika, Europa, America, Asien, Ozeanien)
Tigers are barely even recongnized on 1. (Asien.)
No matter how you cut it, the lion is superior to the tiger. As goes I have provided enough data (the basics) that shows the whole story of your superiorty formality, two links that show the Thread starter whats up in him spreading more lies, and enough data that shows the turth. As I need not to explain any further, any attempts will just be laughed at on a scale of a truthful concept.
So as is....just having fun with it. ^_^