Seems the email some of you received seems to be misleading, if not flat out BS:
* Huge paper capacity---up to 1250 sheets! -- IF you but more trays, it only comes with a 250 sheet tray
* It's network-ready, with built-in 10/100 Ethernet! -- Yeah, once you add the optional NIC
* It's duplex printing-capable! -- Of course the duplexor is optional too (not really BS cause he said "capable")
* It offers Adobe PostScript 3 and PCL compatibility! --
NOT THIS MODEL!!! No postscript here! (or PCL) ...and this is what gave me a hardon in the first place (along with the non-existant NIC) The 4100 E has postscript and pcl6. This is the "winblows" version hence the "w" from what I can reckon.
See this QMS spec link, more accurate than CNET I could not find this page on the website, as this is NOT A CURRENT MODEL...but google is my friend
On a lighter note, it has 2MB standard, with a 100-pin DSDRAM DIMM slot to upgrade to 64MB. The manual references crucial part numbers...At least it's cheap.
64MB - ct16m32s4p8 - $22.49
64MB - ct16m32s4p10 - $22.49
Check out this review:
At the lowest-quality setting of 600 x 600 dpi, the printer completed 10 pages of text at a rate of 12.5ppm. The first page appeared in 18 seconds. In general, I was pleased with the great print speed and crisp, dark text. At the default setting of 1,200 x 600 dpi, text was still right on the mark, but when I added graphics, it was a different story. The printer slowed a bit to 10ppm, but that's not a problem at all compared to the quality of the graphics. The problem was that grays were very grainy, and I noticed a lot of banding. Horizontal lines sliced through the charts. It was the same story for the PowerPoint slides.
You can probably guess what I'm going to say next. High-resolution graphics (printed at the maximum quality of 1,200 x 1,200 dpi) were a disaster. The printer didn't cut out any segments of the images, but I saw more banded lines than I cared to count. Even after following the tips in the printer's troubleshooting guide, there was still a lot of banding. This printer has a 28MHz processor and only 2MB of installed RAM, so increasing to the maximum 66MB of RAM might improve image quality.
This isn't the printer for high-resolution graphics. Laser printers rarely are, but I wouldn't buy this one if you print many graphics at all. However, because of the speedy printing and excellent, sharp fonts, I would recommend this printer if you need text, text, and more text.
Not to mention this thing has no real display on the control panel, just crappy LEDs. I think I will continue my search for a new printer and pass this one up (still kicking myself for passing up the IBM network printer deal of yesteryear). I would rather have an older postscript HP than this. Probably easier to work on with cheaper/more readily available parts, and likely more reliable. A previous employer had alot of Minolta copiers, and they were out of service more than they were IN service. Hope for you guys the printers are more reliable....
But I guess for what it is its still a good price. Should be better than "personal" laser printers that are normally in this price range. I don't want to thread crap, just point out what I've found in my research. I would have been pissed if I ordered after reading the email, expecting alot more than it is.
edit: Oh yeah, I almost forgot... TigerDirect made no mention of
WARRANTY? But maybe I missed it