Why bother? Anything requiring 8GB is likely going to run miserably slow on an ancient C2Q. Even that one.
Why bother? Anything requiring 8GB is likely going to run miserably slow on an ancient C2Q. Even that one.
Why bother? Anything requiring 8GB is likely going to run miserably slow on an ancient C2Q. Even that one.
And C2Q are true quads, C2D true duals...
If I recall, Core 2 Quads worked the same way Pentium Ds did - they're two dies on one package. They're effectively two dual core CPUs taped together. I believe this can theoretically make communication between the CPUs slower.
That said, overclock that CPU if you haven't already. A Core 2 Quad at 4.0 GHz would theoretically perform roughly on par with a modern 2.5 GHz quad core. That's pretty impressive for a CPU that's eight years old - can you imagine using a Pentium MMX in 2006 and expecting it to manage 70% the performance of a Core 2 Solo?
It feel no slow here at all.
It is running on SSD
That chip is about equivalent to a Sandybridge i3 at stock clocks, so it's not surprising you can still compute competently with it.
I've actually got a friend who has a ThinkCentre M58p, and dropped a Xeon L3360 (server equivalent of the 65W Q9550s) into it, along with a low-profile GeForce 730 and 8GB of memory. It's a surprisingly good gamer for titles a few years old.
I think win 7 highest DX is DX 11one worrying thing is DX12 being broken on Core 2 with the latest AMD drivers
but for web browsing my E5420 even stock (2.5GHz) feels fine
also the memory performance tends to be low, so I think some games like GTA V are specially penalized by that?
Why bother? Anything requiring 8GB is likely going to run miserably slow on an ancient C2Q. Even that one.
Daring to install Diablo 3
I am using 2.9 GHz triple-core AM3 + 8 GB + SSD. Even that seems fine to me, despite being so old.Consider - Core2Quad has about the same IPC as AMD's FM2+ APUs.