The internet was beyond their imagination too, but I'm not going to say the first amendment doesn't apply to emails though.
The internet was beyond their imagination too, but I'm not going to say the first amendment doesn't apply to emails though.The right to bear arms doesn't include "arms of any kind", given the constitutionality of restrictions currently in place. At the time it was written, the Constitution only referenced black powder flintlocks. Breech loaders & rifled barrels were very rare while the percussion cap, metallic cartridges & smokeless powder had yet to be invented. The lethality of modern firearms was beyond their imagination.
at the time it was written military and civilians had the exact same arms. heck private corporations and some rich individuals owned the equivalent of a battleships, cannons, ect
The internet was beyond their imagination too, but I'm not going to say the first amendment doesn't apply to emails though.
You misunderstand... the victims, they have the right to die.The ability of one person to murder 58 people and injure some 500 more in just 8 MINUTES negates all of your post. All your ilk care about is your so called rights what about the rights of the victims to live and not get slaughtered?
Explain. Progress has been made in both areas. Citizens had weapons equivalent to what soldiers carried in that day and they probably should now. Freedom is hard and messy. Like I said to make the changes that some want, you are going to have to repeal the 2A at a minimum. If you haven't you should look at the latest Bill Maher episode. He touched on not letting Republicans be the party of freedom. He was commenting on a bill to install sensors in cars to prevent kids being left in hot cars. It's tragic when that happens but it is so statistically small it's ridiculous. We can't have government micro-manage every aspect of our lives. Again, we can't/shouldn't craft policy based on emotions.Needs more false equivalency.
The portrait, gleaned from interviews with hundreds of people interviewed over the past week, is that while Paddock might have been financially successful, he had real difficulty interacting with people. He is described as standoff-ish, disconnected, a man who had difficulty establishing and maintaining meaningful relationships.
The 64-year-old was known for playing gambling games in casinos for hours at a time with little or no human contact. One source told ABC News that Paddock was exhibiting many antisocial traits that are typical of past mass shooters.
Clearly the answer to only allow married men to purchase firearms.
Typical loner, with anti social behavior -
http://abcnews.go.com/US/investigat...-undiagnosed-mental-illness/story?id=50346433
Whew, thank god, that will make the dead people feel better.
Its just another crazy white guy. Nothing to be done about it being easy for the mentally ill having easy access to firearms.
Now if it had been a black guy it would have been because of his rage at white people and the breakdown of social order leading to white people being persecuted in this country. Black people need to get over slavery and institutionalized discrimination.
Muslim - It was an attack on the foundation of America because country music is Christian music. Ban them all.
Single white guy - he is just crazy and we can't do anything about it.
what if it was a crazy white guy shooting at a hip hop concert?
what if it was a crazy white guy shooting at a hip hop concert?
Needs more false equivalency.
Jhhnn is one of the liberal elites that believe you have no rights, no power and no freedom, except what his government permits you.Explain. Progress has been made in both areas. Citizens had weapons equivalent to what soldiers carried in that day and they probably should now. Freedom is hard and messy. Like I said to make the changes that some want, you are going to have to repeal the 2A at a minimum. If you haven't you should look at the latest Bill Maher episode. He touched on not letting Republicans be the party of freedom. He was commenting on a bill to install sensors in cars to prevent kids being left in hot cars. It's tragic when that happens but it is so statistically small it's ridiculous. We can't have government micro-manage every aspect of our lives. Again, we can't/shouldn't craft policy based on emotions.
Jhhnn is one of the liberal elites that believe you have no rights, no power and no freedom, except what his government permits you.
Jhhnn is one of the liberal elites that believe you have no rights, no power and no freedom, except what his government permits you.
Hell in 100 years people like you would be arguing that people of today never imagined they would be using flechette rifles, hand railguns, or lasers, or whatever advanced weaponry humans finally make. That's the lame brain argument you are making now. You don't think people back then could imagine weapons that fired quicker and more accurate? Because if they couldn't imagine it, they couldn't work towards the development of it and we'd still be using muskets the world over. Heck, with the retarded theory you've spouted we should all be using clubs as weapons of war today because no human capable of drafting the Constitution is capable of foreseeing technological improvements in the future to weapons.
Somewhat accurate, just like my post about jhhnnHyperbole
[hahy-pur-buh-lee]
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
- Examples: When I post about gun control or just about anything I'm often prone to hyperbole.
noun, Rhetoric.
1. obvious and intentional exaggeration.
2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to betaken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_silhouette_shootingIs this some kind of shitty argument to open up nuclear weapons, chemical/biological weapons etc to the highest civilian voter? If so, how many days after that happened do you think western civilization would exist?
PS.... 100 yards with a pistol.... my fucking ass....
Jhhnn is one of the liberal elites that believe you have no rights, no power and no freedom, except what his government permits you.
Off topic: But I just watched a video montage of her (and a few others) melting down on election night. She's another that lives in melodrama.
say what you will about Rachel Maddow, but she's not so stupid as to bring a cigarette to a gun fight.
say what you will about Rachel Maddow, but she's not so stupid as to bring a cigarette to a gun fight.