Last Vegas strip shooting: More than 20 dead, 100 injured after gunman opens fire near Mandalay Bay

Page 23 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
Yeah right.

Pop quiz: You're walking down the street with your friends and family and loved ones in a crowd of 200 people and a guardian angel appears and tells you that somebody is about to open fire randomly. The guardian angel says that it can be 58 people in that crowd killed, or just 12. You gonna shrug and say whatever? Gimme a fucking break. You'd beg that it was just 12 rather than 58. You think the 46 extra dead might agree to disagree too? You think the parents that lost their children might agree to disagree? You think the orphans who will never hug their mommy or daddy again will agree to disagree?

That's another tragedy here, that some people will just view the entire thing as a dispassionate exercise in statistics, that 1 dead or 12 dead or 58 dead doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference because the act is 99% of the event. You wouldn't feel that way if you knew or were related to those other 46 victims that a little common sense gun legislation might have saved.
Now isn't the time to talk about what might happen in the future.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,637
12,766
146
This was an outdoor event? I know it sounds like he smashed a window out to shoot, but I thought it was some kind of indoor event. That's really Fing crazy, I can't imagine ever feeling like a dead duck like that.

Dude killed more people then a natural disaster called Irma.
Yes, it was an outdoor concert, and he had a very advantageous shooting angle.
 
Reactions: paperfist

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,007
572
126
AFAIK they claim responsibility for everything bad that happens. If they knew I had tacos last night they'd claim responsibility for my "attack" upon the office bathroom this morning.

I don't think that's wholly true. This lady's an NYT correspondent who covers ISIS:

https://twitter.com/rcallimachi

She says that doesn't often happen.

But so far she thinks it's probable that they're doing exactly what you say. Won't know until we know what's on the shooter's phone.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
This was an outdoor event? I know it sounds like he smashed a window out to shoot, but I thought it was some kind of indoor event. That's really Fing crazy, I can't imagine ever feeling like a dead duck like that.

Dude killed more people then a natural disaster called Irma.

It was in an empty field right across the Luxor. I did walk across that area just a few months ago while I was in LV. I saw that two TALL pipes and was wonder what they were about.

The shooter had the tactical advances of height and surprise, just like the shooter in Dallas a while back but with more targets in a condense area plus more guns/ammo = higher body counts/more carnages.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: paperfist

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,637
12,766
146
Good to know. I stand corrected.

I still would support a high dollar amount reward for a person who notifies the police of someone illegally owning an automatic weapon and many years in prison for possession of such without being licensed.


________
Which, considering we don't even know what weapons he was using at this point (fully automatic, or a 'mock' automatic semi-auto), this would be classified well into the realm of 'knee-jerk'. Having said that, fully automatic weapons are *extremely* expensive, and already have a substantial amount of 'pound you in the ass prison' if you run afoul of the ATF, so I think that's a very very small pool to be focusing on.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,880
34,831
136
You cannot remove such capacity.
All a nutjob has to do is rent a large truck and plow thru a crowd, or buy a bunch of fertilizer and blow it up, also at or near a large crowd. If you require a psychiatric report before renting trucks, then they'll just steal the truck and you still wont have stopped them.

Whenever something like this happens, the general public tends to panic and grope around for something that makes them feel safe even if it doesnt actually make them safer. Usually its in the form of new laws. What they dont consider is hypothetically if laws actually prevented crime, we would not have any freakin crime.

It's certainly possible to reduce the avenues for it and given the experience of other first world countries.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,856
4,974
126
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. The introduction of the horrific act, to me, is 99% of the event. Quantity ranks so low on my list as to barely register, as it's up to as much random happenstance as the intent of the actor.

Tell that to the 58th person that died.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,880
34,831
136
I don't think that's wholly true. This lady's an NYT correspondent who covers ISIS:

https://twitter.com/rcallimachi

She says that doesn't often happen.

But so far she thinks it's probable that they're doing exactly what you say. Won't know until we know what's on the shooter's phone.

My comment was at least in partial jest. I know they don't claim everything but I'd think they'd have interest in doing so here given the circumstances.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
It's certainly possible to reduce the avenues for it and given the experience of other first world countries.

No, it is not CERTAINLY possible. You dont know that. You assume it. You wanna believe it. You cant prove it.
We've already established what works in other countries is not automatically successful in America. We have banned guns plenty of times already. It didnt help much.
We cant give our citizens universal health care either. We want it. We've seen others do it. We cant make it work ourselves. Mostly cuz of greed and selfishness. And the government making bullshit contracts that cost loads of taxpayer dollars and dont help much with anything. Although that could also be greed.
 
Reactions: disappoint

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,044
4,802
136
In a free society there are a plethora of different ways that an irresponsible individual can use to harm other people. Punishment is always about focussing on the guilty
Some "expert" was going on about, well he had to do some practicing somewhere. Really, he was literally shooting ducks in a barrel with an automatic weapon. No skill required.
Sadly enough they were penned up inside of those high barriers making it easy for the shooter to hit them. This in and of itself demonstrates planning as he positioned himself to have access to them from that angle. My heart goes out to the victims and their families.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,663
4,137
136
Its best not to get hung up on the terms like "semi-auto" or "full auto" in the strictest sense. What really matters is with mods, can they put out similar rates of fire? And that has been shown they can, enough to warrant looking at restrictions on them. Arguing over the those two words is pretty pointless. Best to just stick to the overall narrative of the discussion about restrictions and or bans.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
Now isn't the time to talk about what might happen in the future.

Now is the perfect time to talk about it.
You got something else you wanna work on first? I'm certainly not flying out to Vegas to help with disaster relief. And if I decide to donate to somebody it will probably only take about 10 to 15 minutes online, so I'd still be back soon to resume discussion.

(I'm not advocating civilians start turning into vigilantes, I'm just saying we have time to talk about the issue.)
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,880
34,831
136
No, it is not CERTAINLY possible. You dont know that. You assume it. You wanna believe it. You cant prove it.
We've already established what works in other countries is not automatically successful in America. We have banned guns plenty of times already. It didnt help much.
We cant give our citizens universal health care either. We want it. We've seen others do it. We cant make it work ourselves. Mostly cuz of greed and selfishness. And the government making bullshit contracts that cost loads of taxpayer dollars and dont help much with anything. Although that could also be greed.

There is no legislation ever enacted in the US, that I'm aware of, that would reasonably compare to the ban in a place like say Australia. Which incidentally has universal healthcare.

We've decided these things don't work for questionable political reasons not actual practical ones.
 

paperfist

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
6,517
280
126
www.the-teh.com
It was in an empty field right across the Luxor. I did walk across that area just a few months ago while I was in LV. I saw that two TALL pipes and was wonder what they were about.

The shooter had the tactical advances of height and surprise, just like the shooter in Dallas a while back but with more targets in a condense area plus more guns/ammo = higher carnages.

That's pretty eerie to have walked that area recently. I reflect sometimes about areas I've been to and what happened in the past there, but future events are a whole other matter.
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,659
491
126
Which, considering we don't even know what weapons he was using at this point (fully automatic, or a 'mock' automatic semi-auto), this would be classified well into the realm of 'knee-jerk'. Having said that, fully automatic weapons are *extremely* expensive, and already have a substantial amount of 'pound you in the ass prison' if you run afoul of the ATF, so I think that's a very very small pool to be focusing on.

What about a standing high dollar amount reward for reporting illegally owned automatic weapons by persons without a license? Expense aside how difficult is it to convert a semi-auto weapon based on a military model to fully automatic without introducing reliability issues?
While the pool may be small the next step up seems to be calling for an "Assault Weapons Ban". As my father and extended family are firearms owners I grew up going to the range and plinking so an AWB not my first choice in solutions, but perhaps it needs to be brought up again (fat chance with today's Congress).


__________
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Gawd. Trucks are a necessary component of modern civilization. That can't be said about the firepower of modern military carbines.

You broadly missed the point I was making in an overzealous effort to demonize guns. The point was that people that want to commit these types of acts have the element of surprise on their side and can use any number of things to inflict huge numbers of causalities. Whether a gun or something else doesn't matter for these kinds of attacks.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Yeah right.

Pop quiz: You're walking down the street with your friends and family and loved ones in a crowd of 200 people and a guardian angel appears and tells you that somebody is about to open fire randomly. The guardian angel says that it can be 58 people in that crowd killed, or just 12. You gonna shrug and say whatever? Gimme a fucking break. You'd beg that it was just 12 rather than 58. You think the 46 extra dead might agree to disagree too? You think the parents that lost their children might agree to disagree? You think the orphans who will never hug their mommy or daddy again will agree to disagree?

That's another tragedy here, that some people will just view the entire thing as a dispassionate exercise in statistics, that 1 dead or 12 dead or 58 dead doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference because the act is 99% of the event. You wouldn't feel that way if you knew or were related to those other 46 victims that a little common sense gun legislation might have saved.

Yet when I bring up tobacco and how it kills well over a magnitude more than guns that is somehow less tragic to the anti-gun side. I don't get it.
 
Reactions: Phynaz

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,522
759
146
Its best not to get hung up on the terms like "semi-auto" or "full auto" in the strictest sense. What really matters is with mods, can they put out similar rates of fire? And that has been shown they can, enough to warrant looking at restrictions on them. Arguing over the those two words is pretty pointless. Best to just stick to the overall narrative of the discussion about restrictions and or bans.

Semi-auto is better for most situations. I don't know why people get so hung up on full-auto. You can shoot fast with semi-auto. If you ban/heavily regulate full-auto, then logically semi-auto should be too regardless of its bump fire capability.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,181
5,644
146
No, it is not CERTAINLY possible. You dont know that. You assume it. You wanna believe it. You cant prove it.
We've already established what works in other countries is not automatically successful in America. We have banned guns plenty of times already. It didnt help much.
We cant give our citizens universal health care either. We want it. We've seen others do it. We cant make it work ourselves. Mostly cuz of greed and selfishness. And the government making bullshit contracts that cost loads of taxpayer dollars and dont help much with anything. Although that could also be greed.

By "we" you just mean the fucking willfully psychotically ignorant people that there are far too many of in the US. More and more they are choosing to fall under the term "Republican". Even when they hate the Republicans they still choose to claim them as their own because they can find an abundant source of similar minded people in that party.

Its not a coincidence that the people who constantly claim we can't do universal healthcare (ah yes, the good old "corrupt government contracts" bullshit that happen because of the same pieces of shit, meaning if you stop voting those people in, you'll make massive inroads towards fixing both issues) are the ones most adamant about not doing anything but enabling more gun sales. There's a direct correlation. Its obvious to literally every person who has even rudimentary logic capabilities and knowledge of the situation that aren't going in completely adamant that we do nothing to impede chickenshit gun nuts from arming themselves to the teeth (which enables an entire industry that allows guns to be incredibly pervasive in our society, and thus easily obtainable and usable by people having mental episodes where they want to harm, either themselves or others).
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |