Children are to be seen and not heard (or respected).Here we have a young kid that can think for himself, has a head on his shoulders, makes a lot of sense, and the righties JUST CAN NOT STAND IT.
It is driving them absolutely insane, or better said... more insane (than they already are).
This kid one day just might be president, or at least a governor, or a senator.
And we were worried this new and upcoming generation were xbox and cell phone zombies. That nothing else mattered in their world.
Well, obviously that is not the case.
And that too drives conservative righties absolutely insane.
Don't we just love it.
My ex father in-law graduated from Dartmouth with a polysci degree. He was anything but conservative. He had the most amazing vocabulary of strung together cuss words. Got his law degree at G-town in DC.For those starting to feel sorry for Laura Ingraham her, bullying goes all the way back to her college days.
As A College Student, Laura Ingraham Publicly Outed Gay Students
https://www.themaven.net/theintelle...ly-outed-gay-students-a0ZJMKgbH0GbTGJKbQnzOA/
never have felt pity for her, she's been a cvnt for a very long time now.For those starting to feel sorry for Laura Ingraham her, bullying goes all the way back to her college days.
As A College Student, Laura Ingraham Publicly Outed Gay Students
https://www.themaven.net/theintelle...ly-outed-gay-students-a0ZJMKgbH0GbTGJKbQnzOA/
J said it bestIngraham is... disposable for the purposes of Fox News. They've been shining up Tomi Lahren. She's 25, Ingraham is 54. It's the old & busted vs the new hotness.
Its because they're men. Women on the other hand are judged by the hotness factor which favors the young.Yet they stick with Hannity and Tucker both who blatantly lie and obscure the truth for the one viewer every night. So funny to watch Hannity every time he mentions trump it's like "our commander and chief" in a masculine bravado way, lol what a putz.
Fox always did the commander and chief thing for W too. Funny they rarely mentioned it about Obama unless they were blaming him for something.Yet they stick with Hannity and Tucker both who blatantly lie and obscure the truth for the one viewer every night. So funny to watch Hannity every time he mentions trump it's like "our commander and chief" in a masculine bravado way, lol what a putz.
They were too busy idolizing Putin during Obama's termFox always did the commander and chief thing for W too. Funny they rarely mentioned it about Obama unless they were blaming him for something.
That's fucking funny. Railing on kids for week trying to silence their speech, then bitching that her national platform, which is still there for her to use, is being silenced.She's back! Just as hilarious as when she left. bitching about her "loss" of free speech. Hey honey you got your free speech and David got his. Its just his speech stings more.
Laura Ingraham returns following boycott, says liberals 'cutting off free speech'
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/laura-ing...s-cutting-073605015--abc-news-topstories.html
She's back! Just as hilarious as when she left. bitching about her "loss" of free speech. Hey honey you got your free speech and David got his. Its just his speech stings more.
Laura Ingraham returns following boycott, says liberals 'cutting off free speech'
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/laura-ing...s-cutting-073605015--abc-news-topstories.html
She's back! Just as hilarious as when she left. bitching about her "loss" of free speech. Hey honey you got your free speech and David got his. Its just his speech stings more.
Laura Ingraham returns following boycott, says liberals 'cutting off free speech'
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/laura-ing...s-cutting-073605015--abc-news-topstories.html
article said:Instead, Ingraham focused on the left as a whole on Monday and announced a new segment called "Defending the First," a recurring feature which she said will "expose the enemies of the First Amendment, of free expression, and every thought, while showcasing those brave voices making a difference."
We definitely know that conservatives do not support free speech. Those self proclaimed "constitutionalists" only care about the constitution when it furthers their agenda. Look at how much they cry when anything negative is said about Trump or any conservative in general.Except of course those voices making a difference that she doesn't like. Undermining their free speech through irrelevant ad hominem attacks is apparently A-OK then!
She's back! Just as hilarious as when she left. bitching about her "loss" of free speech. Hey honey you got your free speech and David got his. Its just his speech stings more.
Laura Ingraham returns following boycott, says liberals 'cutting off free speech'
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/laura-ing...s-cutting-073605015--abc-news-topstories.html
"I have been the victim of a boycott," Ingraham said. "It is wrong. You shouldn't do this by team. It is the modern way of cutting off free speech.
Her first example were two black female conservatives stifled on Facebook.She's back! Just as hilarious as when she left. bitching about her "loss" of free speech. Hey honey you got your free speech and David got his. Its just his speech stings more.
Laura Ingraham returns following boycott, says liberals 'cutting off free speech'
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/laura-ing...s-cutting-073605015--abc-news-topstories.html
So what exactly does she want here? Someone says something offensive, which big company advertisers don't want to be associated with, she thinks they should not be free to drop the offender? Sounds kinda fascist to me... Does she think Pepsi shouldn't be allowed to refuse their ads on nazi videos on youtube for example? Very confused what her coherent ideology is... Lol! Of course not! Conservatives don't have ideology, only enemies.
Boycotting someone for associating with people you find reprehensible is the very definition of free speech. Ingraham is either too stupid to know this (unlikely) or too dishonest to admit it. (Likely)
As usual the conservative argument is that they should be able to say whatever they want without consequence. They want all the freedom, none of the responsibility. It’s the approach of a child.
Can I plagiarize this? Sure it will come in handyQuite balsy of the same people who argue that businesses shouldn't have to sell to gay people if it violate their beliefs, now arguing that it's wrong to not advertise with someone if it violate their beliefs!
Almost have to admire them for executing such blatant dishonesty, and getting away with it. On the one hand maybe Democrats could win more elections if they adopted these vile tactics, but I'm not sure I'd want that. Actaully, I think it mainly works when your core message is demonizing supposed enemies, it probably wouldn't work as well for the Dem's message.
sure! Feel free to rewrite it more eloquentlyCan I plagiarize this? Sure it will come in handy