mcurphy
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2003
- 4,150
- 8
- 81
Originally posted by: DangerDave
xtknight, have you seen the Maximum Pc review of the NEC 20WMGX2? They gave it a 4. They said it was majorly flawed, and other bad stuff. Are they talking about the same lcd thats on your list, or am I missing something here?
I noticed that as I was flipping through it this morning as well. It is the same monitor that is highly recommended here.
Here is a snip from the article regarding their concerns with the NEC for those who haven't seen it:
The above quote as well as the price is what contributed to the poor score.....Several shades of dark gray were indistinguishable from black, even with the brightness at 100 percent (and mind you, the screen is already uncommonly bright!). Grayscale ramps, which should progress in a smooth, gradual manner, were riddled with bumps, kinks, and banding. And color-tracking discrepancies were visable in scales of 32 or more steps. These issues plagued the screen's performance in our real-world tests. In high-res digital photos and illustrations, banding, contouring and the presence of different hues disrupted what should have been subtle shade changes. In DVD's, the effect was even more noticeable, with shade transitions appearing blocky and pixilated. And in HD, the panel's poor grayscale abilities were all the more evident.....
They used these three monitors as well in the roundup:
ViewSonic VX2035WM ~ Scored 8
HP L2045W ~ Scored a 9
Samsung Syncmaster 206BW ~ Scored a 9 and Maximum PC Kickass Award
I know the NEC is an AS-IPS, but can anyone tell me what kind of panel these last three monitors use?
EDIT: After a few quick google searches it appears that the other 3 use a TN panel , how can Maximum PC recommend these so much higher than the NEC?...lame