Leann Rimes looks anorexic.

[BoomerD]

She doesn't look anorexic to me, but I don't find her at all attractive. TOO lean, too muscular, too much of a butter face.

 

[classy]

I think she looks great. The other pics show she is a small petite woman, but not anorexic.

 

[BUTCH1]

After she eats something.

OK, throw a burger at her and let me hit it!..

 

[zinfamous]

OK, throw a burger at her and let me hit it!..

OK. while you're busy trying to get your dick in a burger, I'm gonna take the opportunity to have sex with Ms. Rimes.

 

[destrekor]

i'm worried by the term "healthy". you can be fit and look healthy but still be sick or diseased.
Likewise you can be fat but still be healthy. fat just increases a health risk. I know a fat boy who can run 5 miles. thats like 4.5 miles farther than i can run, i'm slender with muscle tone. i have high blood pressure and hear diseas runs in the family.

It's rare that you can look physically fit and be plagued with bad diseases. You'll need a cardiovascular performance capability to allow the effort needed to help tear up and repair those muscles, and you'll need a good diet to get there that also typically means you'll also combat cardiovascular problems.

Being skinny and being overweight are too simplistic an approach. If you look at her body and simple see "skinny", you aren't paying attention in the right ways.
If you are skinny but not healthy in terms of cardio, you won't look like you're at peak fitness. Now, body building is entirely different. If you have massive muscles and are super strong, regardless of weight, you could still have health issues. Still less likely, but a bodybuilder would be a better one to bet against in terms of health than someone who is obviously into cardio. Still, a bodybuilder will probably be in better health than regular joe who happens to have an appearance that, from far away, appears physically fit/capable.

Skin tone, muscle tone, muscle type/style, and fat disposition...

Now, I'm not arguing someone like her will have a better cardiovascular system (heart performance, blood pressure and lipids in serum) than any regular "healthy" person... but it'll be healthy/near ideal, and likely will be better than before becoming fit. And it's not likely that, after reaching the point she has reached, she is far from a physiologically ideal level of health.
To reach that point, her body had to support her. It's not easy to reach an obvious fitness capability like she has, and the body has to work hard to get there - and in doing so, along with the body's demands for better nutrition, typically overcomes any health issues that have persisted for a lifetime.

Just because someone has high blood pressure or other health issues, doesn't mean it can't change without meds. Most often, the diet and fitness level are to blame - correcting those for long-term performance training/long-term health is usually the best approach to managing your body.

 

[qliveur]

OK. while you're busy trying to get your dick in a burger, I'm gonna take the opportunity to have sex with Ms. Rimes.

Approach with caution. She looks like she could hurt somebody.

 

[shortylickens]

Approach with caution. She looks like she could hurt somebody.

She could hurt my testes with her tongue.

 

[HeXen]

It's rare that you can look physically fit and be plagued with bad diseases.

rare? hell you know its the good looking people that are more likely to end up with herpes, aids..etc. Even body builders get cancer. go to a cancer survivor walk and you see all kinds of fit bodies.
Truth is you can have no clue just by looking at people if they are clinically healthy or not.

If you are skinny but not healthy in terms of cardio, you won't look like you're at peak fitness.

actually your dead wrong there. i look very fit, i lift. 6pack n all but still have high blood pressure and your body type does not guarantee you can run any length of distance. And nothing i do is going to get rid of genetically transferred heart diseases...assuming it was passed to me.

 

[QueBert]

She doesn't look anorexic to me, but I don't find her at all attractive. TOO lean, too muscular, too much of a butter face.

All true yet according to the ATOT wisdom you couldn't even get within a 1,000 feet of her in your wildest dreams.

 

[BUTCH1]

OK. while you're busy trying to get your dick in a burger, I'm gonna take the opportunity to have sex with Ms. Rimes.

LOL..

 

[zinfamous]

It's rare that you can look physically fit and be plagued with bad diseases. .

one of the many reasons that cancer is a stone cold bitch.

 

[destrekor]

rare? hell you know its the good looking people that are more likely to end up with herpes, aids..etc. Even body builders get cancer. go to a cancer survivor walk and you see all kinds of fit bodies.
Truth is you can have no clue just by looking at people if they are clinically healthy or not.

Eh, those kinds of health issues aren't something I consider with this. Obviously, opportunistic diseases don't care about physiological condition (for the most part).

actually your dead wrong there. i look very fit, i lift. 6pack n all but still have high blood pressure and your body type does not guarantee you can run any length of distance. And nothing i do is going to get rid of genetically transferred heart diseases...assuming it was passed to me.

You win that point sir.

However, body type, in terms of muscle-fiber type, definitely leads your body to be far better at one type of activity over another. In terms of running, you're really either destined to be a sprinter, or an endurance runner. Whether you are anywhere near the best at either type is another question, and whether your body can even train for both types is also another matter altogether. And generally, someone with a sprinter's muscle style will always be better at sprinting than distance running - and typically such a person will be better at that activity than someone who has the opposite majority muscle-fiber type. Like you said, it doesn't entirely dictate what you can do and how well you can do it, but it pushes your body in that direction. If you aren't competitive about it, it doesn't even matter. Any person can train to run a handful of miles or similar cardio activity, but training for competition you tend to listen to your body. I don't know if you can be a highly competitive sprinter if your body has fewer fast-twitch fibers and more slow-twitch fibers.

Of course, you can train your heart out to build up more fast-twitch if you care to, but it's working against the current in this case.

One more that proves your point: someone could look in perfect health now, but has a disease that will essentially force muscle atrophy sometime in the future, or some other systemic disease like RA or Lupus or whatnot. Sometimes, especially when young, those diseases won't stop you from reaching peak fitness - but they will cut that ride short at some point.


With another read through, I'm not entirely sure I actually understand your message though. So you are into physical activity, but don't really run much?
Of course a fatty who runs more than you will be able to run further and faster than you - you can't just put on running shoes and go and expect it to be a great run.

Also, in terms of true heart disease, that is different, because its more of a defect than a disease. Without surgery, it can be hard to fight against - and depending on the severity, it will seriously impact cardiovascular performance.
That's not something you can readily change, and it's also not something I'd consider part of "health". Like some other health issues, you inherit it, and while not all inheritable health issues are uncorrectable, heart disease is one that typically needs correction by an outside party.

That's more of a "bad luck" than unhealthy choices. When I speak of fitness and health, I'm focusing on self-correctable and self-manageable issues. Blood pressure can be corrected, cholesterol can be corrected... a whole novel worth of issues can be improved (not necessarily cured) through proper nutrition - proper nutrition requires exercise... but not for the point of burning more calories through energy expenditure, but through the chemical processes that happen simply to support the physical activity. It helps your body burn up what you didn't actually need, and helps make sure everything is getting utilized.

But obviously, if you have an uncorrectable kink in the cardiovascular system, improving your heart and blood health is nigh an impossible task, at least doing so entirely on your own. It can be hard to do the physical activity necessary to help your body combine the improved nutrition if your heart cannot sustain that level of effort.

There's a reason the medical community is so in love with diet and exercise for heart and blood health. It's not necessarily the most efficient diet, but the exercise isn't supposed to be an additional weight to lose weight - it's supposed to be a way to let your body enter into a more primal, natural mode - where it is far more efficient at utilizing what you give your body.


And wait, what are your "heart diseases". I notice you made that plural, but only mentioned high blood pressure.

What are you currently doing for your blood pressure? Consuming Omega 3s, at all? Focusing on monounsatured fats? (polyunsatured fats are also good, to an extent - you need those fatty acids, after all)
Such fats will do wonders, alongside any kind of cardio activity you can do, to help slowly bring your lipids into check.
And you should be trying to get a few grams of Omega 3s and other fatty acids, every day. You're body might not seriously complain when you don't get enough, but it will greatly appreciate getting more if you aren't getting enough - the body uses good lipids for everything, and Omega 3s are especially useful in the construction of new tissue in the CNS.

 

[zinfamous]

All true yet according to the ATOT wisdom you couldn't even get within a 1,000 feet of her in your wildest dreams.

uh, that's called reality, haha.

 

[QueBert]

uh, that's called reality, haha.

Nah, in reality even TridenT could get close to a white female who looks like T-1000 & Michael Jackson had a baby.

 

[zinfamous]

Nah, in reality even TridenT could get close to a white female who looks like T-1000 & Michael Jackson had a baby.

I'm talking about a particular individual--in this case, LeeAnne Rimes. You said "get within 1,000 yards of her." i.e., LeeAnn Rimes.

The fact that most people in this world will not get within 1,000 yards of LeeAnn Rimes is a statistical certainty.

But yes, any man, any person, will certainly get within 1000 yards of any number of remarkably attractive women and men within their lives. Though, I doubt your assertion that this is true with TridenT.
:hmm:

 

[SolMiester]

She looks great, I prefer a bit more meat on than that though, it must be squeezing a side of beef...yuk!

 

[BoomerD]

All true yet according to the ATOT wisdom you couldn't even get within a 1,000 feet of her in your wildest dreams.

That's OK with me...I don't want to hear her sing either...

Besides, I think the restraining order is still in effect from the last time.

 

[Malak]

After reviewing pictures further, I have come to the conclusion that she is very clearly underweight, though whether or not she is anorexic is entirely impossible to tell. But she is very underweight.

 

[SKORPI0]

[URL="http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/31/leann-rimes-im-not-scary-skinny/"]LeAnn Rimes: I'm not 'scary skinny'[/URL]

What should have been a beautiful belated honeymoon turned into a bit of drama for LeAnn Rimes.


Vacationing in Mexico with hubby Eddie Cibrian, Rimes shared her bliss with her Twitter followers, posting a photo of herself on the beach in a blue bikini on Sunday.


Shortly afterward, fans began commenting on her thin frame, with one noting, "Whoa, you're scary skinny! Sorry don't mean to offend but that's a lot of bones showing through skin..."


Rimes fired back and gave the critic the skinny.


"Those are called abs, not bones, love," wrote the singer, who wed Cibrian in April. "This is my body and I can promise you I'm a healthy girl. I'm just lean. Thx for your concern but no need to be."

Skinny yes, anorexic far from it. OP does not know the difference. :whiste:

 

[dennilfloss]

According to the Daily Fail, the war of the skinnies has begun!:hmm:

With some new (bikini, for those at work who need to know before clicking) pics of Ms. Rimes taken recently. D:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...res-slender-Giuliana-Rancic-calling-thin.html

 

[0roo0roo]

thats not skinny, thats granny body.

 

[TheVrolok]

According to the Daily Fail, the war of the skinnies has begun!:hmm:

With some new (bikini, for those at work who need to know before clicking) pics of Ms. Rimes taken recently. D:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...res-slender-Giuliana-Rancic-calling-thin.html

Those new pics are awful, she has an old lady body with some breasts.

 

[IcePickFreak]

Being in shape is anorexic?

In posting this thread I was expressing a concern for her health, you twit!

Coming from you.. LOL

 

[chin311]

barf. if shes not anorexic shes still disgusting in my eyes.

 

[LTC8K6]

I am failing to find fault here...