Let the hype begin! Patriots vs. Colts (11/4)

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: rise

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: rise

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
hmmm...must have been all the che, no wait, it's the weak schedule, i mean, running up the score, umm, if only my guy was healthy, yeah, that's the one. if only my guy was healthy...

the 2 best teams in the league, maybe ever, played an awesome football game today. offense, defense, coaching, teamwork and individual effeort were all as good as it gets.

Take Moss away from the Patriots today, think it would have turned out the same? Pats lucky to come back from a 21-10 deficit with less than 10 minutes to play. Best two teams, EVER? How long you been watching football, 4 weeks?

Another team with a good D and solid running game can do the same to the Pats. Pitt has a better D than Indy, and I can't wait to see Fast Willie against that slow D.

if, if, if. that's loser talk if i ever heard it.

Not a Colts fan, stop reading your bias into objective comments. BTW the word "if" is not anywhere in my post

wtf??? you asked what would happen if Moss didn't play. thats an if. you can try to paint your steelers in any light you want, but the fact is that they aren't as good as the pats.

Yeah, still don't see the word "IF" in my original question. It was a serious question, unless you think the Colts not having Harrison had no effect, likewise the Pats not having Moss would have no effect on their offense. If you truly believe that, then you are obviously far too biased in regards to these teams. Be nice to be able to talk football without all the fanbois.

whatever, we'll see what haoppens when the pats play the steelers, like in said in the other thread.

just remeber, you play with the players you have. it's not FF. line up and play. the pats will beat the steelers 9 out of 10, and this won't be the 1 for the steelers.

Fanboi award of the day

I don't care who wins the regular season matchup, it is nothing more than a regular season scrimmage.

 

[rise]

btw alistar, you know shit about football if you think the steelers are as good as the pats.

 

[rise]

and thanks for the

 

[Tooncesthedrivingcat]

Originally posted by: DLeRium

Originally posted by: JujuFish

Originally posted by: krunchykrome
and they still have to face the Raven's defense

Yeah, but they also have to face the Ravens' offense. I'd say the Steelers have a better chance than the Ravens do.

Ravens' offense. Laugh.... The defense might be tough, but that doesn't make it a tough game.

I think he was pointing out the Ravens offense sucks. Hence an easy win for the Pats.

 

[rise]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
I don't care who wins the regular season matchup, it is nothing more than a regular season scrimmage.

i don't care either, other than the fact that the pats will be playing at home and the steelers can't even beat the cardinals on the road, lol.


yeah, the steelers are tough :laugh:

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: rise
btw alistar, you know shit about football if you think the steelers are as good as the pats.

I made objective observations on their comparitive ability relation to the Colts D and their personnel, not the Patriots. My only observation was that their defense is lacking speed, an asset of the Steelers running game.

Your arguements lack any crebile football insight, you have not even attemtped to make a serious judgement, ulitmate fanboi. Go call your friends and have another circle jerk around the Bellicheck poster. Want to talk real football, contribute something substantive.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: rise

Originally posted by: Alistar7
I don't care who wins the regular season matchup, it is nothing more than a regular season scrimmage.

i don't care either, other than the fact that the pats will be playing at home and the steelers can't even beat the cardinals on the road, lol.


yeah, the steelers are tough :laugh:

How many road games did the Steelers win on the way to their title in 2005? Is this a better team than that one, absolutely.

How many teams win them all? NE win lose one or more, but I think home field is a lock. Judging how a team will be playing in January based on how they played in October is hysterical BTW. The year the Ravens won their title at this same point in the season they were considered a joke. You are entitled to your opinion, but anyone that would suggest the Steelers were not a tough (physical) team appears to be the one not up to speed.

 

[rise]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: rise
btw alistar, you know shit about football if you think the steelers are as good as the pats.

I made objective observations on their comparitive ability relation to the Colts D and their personnel, not the Patriots. My only observation was that their defense is lacking speed, an asset of the Steelers running game.

Your arguements lack any crebile football insight, you have not even attemtped to make a serious judgement, ulitmate fanboi. Go call your friends and have another circle jerk around the Bellicheck poster. Want to talk real football, contribute something substantive.

contibute someting? to your useless arguements? they fall flat all by themself.

seriously get bored talking with jerks like you. you, sir, are the fanboy. i look at the teams and i don't see where the steelers are better than the pats in any apsect of the game. deeko knows ball, you don't.

you keep talking about the pats "slow" defense, yet they get it fone week after week. you trot out useless stats in the first few weeks of the seadon to make your steelers look better than the pats. remember that? lol/ you're a stat whoring FF fan who knows nothing about the game.

you think the pats wil let parker run wild? not a chance. they'll make ben throw and good luck with that.

 

[Alistar7]

Don't think having the highest scoring offense automatically means Lombardi. Has not happened in 7 years, and that game was decided by a tackle on the one yard line. You may have heard the expression "defense wins championships". That was one of the most exciting SB in the 30+ I have seen.


I was not comparing the Pats against the Steelers, I was comparing Indy's D to Pitts. Pitt has more speed than them, stops the run better, gives up fewer points, and generates a lot more pressure. I am sorry those facts "fall flat by themself"

You can check out the stats and see where Pitt is ahead of NE, but they are really only insights into a teams overall play. Matchups are just as important, and I think in many respects Pitt matches up just a bit better than the Colts on defense, and with their speed at back. Indy has the "#1" pass defense, when only considering yards allowed, a whopping 13 yards less per game than Pitt, yet only 12 (1.5 game) sacks to Pitts 19 (2.7). Is Pitt faster, considerably, more physical, that's not even close.

I'll take a much more polished Ben over the 2nd year player who led the Steelers to the Super Bowl with 3 outstanding playoff games on the road. They tried putting the gme on Ben's less experienced shoulders, he had no problem rising to the challenge.

Game 1/8 at Cincinnati: Had the best playoff performance of his young career?completed 14-of-19 passes for 208 yards, three TDs and a 148.7 passer-rating

AFC Championship Game 1/22 at Denver: Completed 21-of-29 passes for 275 yards, two TDs and a 124.9 passer-rating

Again, no real football talk from you. Thump your chest and talk about how great the NE offense is and point to the stats the support that claim. Ignore any other stats that can be used to discuss another teams strengths/weaknesses, or god forbid have a honest discussion about how two teams match up together.

I do not and never will plaay FF, and I have been waatching football since the mid 70's. I have forgotten more about the game than you will ever know. As you have nothing to add I will not waste another post, good day. I

 

[rise]

lol, i won't even read all your post. your useless. curb is coming on.

look back in your "how bout them steelers" thread. you were saying how the steelers were better than the pats in "important" stats like TOP, 3rd down efficincey, etc.

whatever. hows that worked out for ya?

have a good nite and we'll see what happp[ens when they match up :beer:

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
I was not comparing the Pats against the Steelers, I was comparing Indy's D to Pitts. Pitt has more speed than them

Well that seals the deal, you're an idiot.

 

[yosuke188]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: Alistar7
I was not comparing the Pats against the Steelers, I was comparing Indy's D to Pitts. Pitt has more speed than them

Well that seals the deal, you're an idiot.

QFT

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: yosuke188

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: Alistar7
I was not comparing the Pats against the Steelers, I was comparing Indy's D to Pitts. Pitt has more speed than them

Well that seals the deal, you're an idiot.

QFT

Back 7-8 they do, at running back, no question. They normally only have 3 down linemen, at times only 2. Extra linebackers, DB's over 4 standard linemen is going to mean more defensive team speed overall. They still maintain a stronger run D and better QB pressure (than Indy) with that undersized rotation, and play a more physical game.

Yes, don't read what you can't understand and address intelligently rise, just go back to whining about the refs. It's ok when the Pats used a defensive philosphy of being physical with the Colts recievers a few years back, but not vice versa today. Same approach was used on the Rams "greatest show on turf" team, it's predictable when faced with a high powere vertical passing offense. Think Dan Fouts didn't see the same approach in his day?

Please pay no attention to stats, what insight could they possibly give? How does Vegas handicap game, oh that's right, they use STATS. The stats said this would be a close game, how did it turn out, close? Look at the game stats themselves, also very close but all that means nothing because "Ne will RoXr ur SoxrZ and poon ur noobs", fing tards.

Rattled off observations going back to the 50's based on some of the more idiotic fanboi comments in this thread. Still haven't had anyone address the mathup, or my comparisions, with anything resembling a serious football intellect. Great place for cheering your team on, but not many peeps truly interested/capable in discussing/analyzing a game with serious, legitimate football knowledge.

 

[Reckoner]

alistar putting his squealers into the sb mix makes baby Jesus cry rofl

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
alistar putting his squealers into the sb mix makes baby Jesus cry rofl

Didn't predict they would make it there, only suggested it was very likely all 3 of these teams would be playing for that chance in January.

You fail at reading, impressive.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: rise
lol, i won't even read all your post. your useless. curb is coming on.

look back in your "how bout them steelers" thread. you were saying how the steelers were better than the pats in "important" stats like TOP, 3rd down efficincey, etc.

whatever. hows that worked out for ya?

have a good nite and we'll see what happp[ens when they match up :beer:

They still are, gap has widened in 3rd own efficiency, narrowed in TOP. How's that worked out for me? What a stupid question LMAO.

You have rebutted NOTHING with a football related reason, your only course is to make personal attacks. Shows either a lack of knowledge, or the inability to articulate a reasonable debate otherwise. I am guessing, both....

 

[Reckoner]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
alistar putting his squealers into the sb mix makes baby Jesus cry rofl

Didn't predict they would make it there, only suggested it was very likely all 3 of these teams would be playing for that chance in January.

You fail at reading, impressive.

I said into the superbowl MIX, not THE superbowl. You sir, are the one that fails at reading comprehension

 

[BUTCH1]

Regarding that "noise" during the game (when the Pat's were on offense), sounded like
the Colts might have been trying to pipe in noise during the game. Here is the link me thinks
the league better look into this one..

 

[Reckoner]

Only someone at the game will know for sure, since it could've been a broadcasting problem otherwise. It is quite fishy though, especially for a team that's been investigated for piping artificial noise into the stadium before...

 

[ballmode]

im sad

 

[mooglemania85]

The Colts pipe in extra noise? Surely a team as classy as the Colts wouldn't resort to such shenanigans!

 

[Reckoner]

Originally posted by: ballmode
im sad

Looks like evil wins eh? ;0

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: mooglemania85
The Colts pipe in extra noise? Surely a team as classy as the Colts wouldn't resort to such shenanigans!

No, of course not! They would never do something like that!

Edit:
Just listened. Damn that sounds weird. The league won't even glance at it though.

 

[Reckoner]

Another Link:

Text


Go to 2:23 in the video, you'll hear the sound loop

 

[BCYL]

I heard the sound loop during the game, but thought it was a broadcasting problem on CBS' part...