Lets all do another bench thread, this time up CineBench

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: Zebo
CPU 939 winch 3000@2655
windows 2000 sp4.
Graphics Card : 6800gt @ultra

CineBench 2003 Rendering
PC2300 - 3-3-3 1T- 363
PC3000 - 3-3-3 1T- 365
PC3000 - 2-2-2 1T- 366
PC4700 - 3-4-3 1T- 368
PC3800 - 2.5-2-2-1T - 367

CineBench 2003 Shading
PC2300 - 3-3-3 1T- 414
PC3000 - 3-3-3 1T- 426
PC3000 - 2-2-2 1T- 434
PC4700 - 3-4-3 1T- 439
PC3800 - 2.5-2-2-1T - 440


CineBench 2003 OpenGL SW
PC2300 - 3-3-3 1T- 1949
PC3000 - 3-3-3 1T- 1992
PC3000 - 2-2-2 1T- 2019
PC4700 - 3-4-3 1T- 2032
PC3800 - 2.5-2-2-1T - 2034


CineBench 2003 OpenGL HW
PC2300 - 3-3-3 1T- 3568
PC3000 - 3-3-3 1T- 3662
PC3000 - 2-2-2 1T- 3756
PC4700 - 3-4-3 1T- 3781
PC3800 - 2.5-2-2-1T - 3796

LMAO! you rock you benchmarking freak!

 

[Zebo]

I just ripped it from that 939 mem matrix thread..I'm done for awile that was two weekends I had to fib and tell momma my comp was'nt working and req'd in depth troubleshooting..

 

[stevty2889]

Since I lowered my FSB to keep the freakin thing from throttling, I also adjsted mem timings to 2.5 3 3 7, and got a bit more..

CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : here we go again

Processor : P4 550 3400
MHz : 3.6ghz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : XP pro

Graphics Card : 6800GT
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 328 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 392 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.19

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 417 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1645 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 2619 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 6.27

****************************************************

 

[stevty2889]

And my other PC: a 3.2ES at 3.45Ghz with 4x256MB PC3500 kingmax, and a 9600pro

CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : me

Processor : P4 540 3.2ghz
MHz : 3.45ghz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : XP Pro SP1

Graphics Card : AIW 9600 pro
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 302 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 362 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.20

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 382 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1544 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3119 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 8.16

***************************************************

 

[TStep]

stevty2889

Not to get OT, but do you have any extra voltage applied to the P4? If not, would it then be expected that the true P4 3.8 is going to throttle under this scenario just the same as your first run? Is this test that unusually hard on the cpu to warrant clock throttling in the few minutes it takes to run?

I've always liked my Intel setups, but if throttling is going to take over in the short amount of time it takes to run this test, that is somewhat sad. Would it also react in this manner if stability testing with Prime95?

 

[stevty2889]

I upped the voltage to get it to 3.8ghz. It is prime95 stable, but prime95 won't show the throttling either. I ran other benchmarks that seemed unusualy low as well, so thats why I started to expect the throttling. The only clue I had that it was going on at all was the benchmark scores, as it didn't slow anything down, including half life 2, enough for me to notice the differance. In any case, with an XP-120 and artic silver 5, I am definatly not happy with the temps. The throttling kicks in when the temp hits 70c, and stops as soon as it drops below 70c. I tried disabling the throttling in my BIOS, but it does it anyway.

 

[Noid]

I got a corrupted file from the 'america' D/L link...

Trying 'From author' this time

 

[TStep]

thanks for the info Dothan desktop really needs to happen.

 

[Noid]

CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : Noid
Processor : 2400m (1800)
MHz : 2370
Number of CPUs : 1
Operating System : W2k

Graphics Card : r9700pro
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 297 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): --- CB-CPU


Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 342 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1516 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3280 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 9.60

****************************************************


____________________________________________________________________
After a re-boot .....


CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : Noid

Processor : Gamer
MHz : 2370
Number of CPUs : 1
Operating System : W2K SP4

Graphics Card : r9700pro
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 300 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): --- CB-CPU


Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 341 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1523 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3221 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 9.44

****************************************************

 

[Zebo]

I've been suspect of all P4 benchmarks from hardware sites for awile because of this throttleing.... Why? cause they test in open air envrioment, in cold office buildings which is unrepresentitive of most user...in a case..at home with a summer budget consious 80 degrees.. inside cases are hotter, peoples homes are hotter. P4 likes to thottle.

 

[Noid]

I'm confused also....

Lower numbers are better right ...?

Seems my numbers aren't to shabby for a 2400 and a 9700pro ?

 

[Zebo]

only in golf.

 

[Noid]

Originally posted by: Zebo
only in golf.

I can't believe how snide members are getting in these forums...

How about a straight answer for once ...?
Just trying to figure out how the numbers relate....

Someone is going to ask ... why not me ...?

 

[TStep]

Not to start a bash, but Intel should advertise the P4 3.8 as: "P4 up to 3.8ghz" or move along to the next core already. Overclocking and fighting temps because of overclocking is one thing, but if it cannot run at the rated speed under normal conditions or a silly little benchmark such as this is another. Worse in a way than the PVP thing going on in Video, since it affects all P4 users performing any cpu strenuous task, not just the one's using a particular feature.

Fealt good>>>off the soapbox now

 

[Zebo]

...in the intrest of peace I retract.

 

[68GTX]

Results @ 3.2/3.4GHz




CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : Mark

Processor : 3.2GHz Northwood
MHz : 3.2GHz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System :Win XP Pro

Graphics Card : Radeon 9800 Pro
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 324 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 383 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.18

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 343 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1578 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3360 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 9.80

****************************************************


============================================


CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : Mark

Processor : 3.2GHz Northwood
MHz : 3.4GHz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : Win XP Pro

Graphics Card : Radeon 9800 Pro
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 346 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 409 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.18

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 366 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1679 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3571 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 9.77

****************************************************

 

[Noid]

Originally posted by: Zebo
...in the intrest of peace I retract.

lol .. I was going to rebuttle that post before you 'retracted'.

You should cut back on your caffine?
Maybe then, you can put a 'buffer' on what you think and what you post.


I'm comparing my numbers to some of these Dual P4 numbers that are running over 1g faster.
My numbers are just a couple marks off some scores.
That's why I'm asking.

It still doesnt make sense... I'm not using this bench.

 

[Zebo]

Maybe then, you can put a 'buffer' on what you think and what you post.

Rarley do I. Politics never my fortee but I did'nt want to derail topic so like I said I retract.

Anyway back on topic.. your Tbred is an excellent processor with high intructions set per clock, much higher than p4 which relies on raw speed/mhz for it's computing power to match tbreds. This is normal. Some benches, like POVray which is all old school math, you need almost twice the mhz of p4 to match a Tbred/barton.

 

[FrustratedUser]

*Bookmarked*

 

[Noid]

Thx for reminding me of the diffences in Intel to AMD.

I just thought I would be slammed with Dual Intel systems...

So, OGL is software and hardware driven.

Still trying to figure out if the OGL numbers are GPU numbers or CPU or BOTH

.. and how my r9700pro is utilizing OGL
(the OGL hardware number right ...?)

nah ,,, can't be ... cuz 68gtx upped his cpu and that number went up ...

this is strickly a CPU bench ... I got it ...

 

[GuitarDaddy]

Here is my Winchester 3200+ @ 2525
Can't compete with the duallies and high end GPU's, but respectable none the less.


CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester :

Processor : The Beast
MHz : 2525mhz
Number of CPUs : 1
Operating System : Windows XP SP2

Graphics Card : 6600GT (1)
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 356 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): --- CB-CPU


Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 427 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1889 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3398 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 7.96

****************************************************

 

[Accord99]

Originally posted by: Zebo
More proof bandwidth means little on A64. You have half the bandwidth and score nearly identical.

It's only proof that bandwidth means little for Cinebench. The 3.06GHz P4 beats the 3GHz P4c with only 40% of the bandwidth.

 

[Accord99]

Originally posted by: Noid
I'm comparing my numbers to some of these Dual P4 numbers that are running over 1g faster.
My numbers are just a couple marks off some scores.
That's why I'm asking.

Those aren't dual P4, they're HT enabled P4s which can be used by Cinebench to achieve a ~18% gain in throughput.

 

[stevty2889]

Well now that I have water cooling and my P4 is no longer throttling here are my results @3.9ghz

CINEBENCH 2003 v1
****************************************************

Tester : Myself

Processor : 3.4 550
MHz : 3910
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : XP Pro SP2

Graphics Card : Gainward 6800GT@375/1050
Resolution : 1280x1024
Color Depth : 32bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 340 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 405 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.19

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 430 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1739 CB-GFX
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 3434 CB-GFX

OpenGL Speedup: 7.99

****************************************************