Let's talk about what Democrats should talk about to win 2018 and 2020; here are my five ideas

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dyna

Senior member
Oct 20, 2006
813
61
91
#2 is counterproductive. Term limits removes the only incentive to please the people. The term lame duck exists for a reason. Also it seems to me that removing compensation for the job will only increase the incentive to seek worse ways to capitalize on the power they've been given.

I think the people that are willing to serve the government with minimal needs and live like the people they serve can relate and will resist succumbing to lame duck and fight to the end for whats right and potentially prepare a successor. The current regime blatantly flaunts their public abuse of power, wealth, greed and does not display an ounce of decency. Any other option is better and worth a try.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,704
25,038
136
2. Fix Congress
  • Term limits
  • They work as a social servant. Average American salary, housing, healthcare, vacations etc... It should not be a career where you are given the greatest luxuries available and live as royalty, it simply distorts decision making to be selfish and ineffective.
.

I don't think term limits have worked out the way they were expected to at the state level. The most common complaint I've seen in several states now is that most of the institutional memory shifts to lobbyists who also take a larger role in crafting legislation. That isn't making government more responsive to the people. Instead I would argue that removing the ability of legislators to pick their voters would probably have a bigger impact and apply the same concept to how congressional districts are drawn.

The salary for a member of congress isn't insanely high. Most people who go are already wealthy before they ever run for office. Instead look for ways to make it easier for more average people to run. I honestly think congress worked better when more members moved their families to DC and spent more time building relationships across the aisle. Today's 4 days in DC 3 days in the home district is another thing we have to thank the Newt for.
 
Reactions: dank69 and ivwshane

hardhat

Senior member
Dec 4, 2011
425
115
116
A couple of you mentioned how you think point #3 on gun control is a bad idea - let me explain my reasoning. In my mind, to generalize, you have three big groups of voters out there:
  1. Folks who lean slightly to heavily Democrat
  2. Folks who lean slightly to heavily Republican
  3. Folks who pick and choose based on what's available
You can't ever forget that you still need to appeal to that first group, and you need every one them to turn out. One of Hillary's problems - and one of Bernie's potential strengths - was that the first group didn't turn out in 2016. The lesson, if you ask me, is you still have to put out authentic leftist policy and not avoid answering hard questions. What are we going to do about the non-stop mass shootings, candidate? There has to be an answer or you haemorrhage folks from group number one.

I like your scenario, but I'm not sure I agree that most leftists feel strongly enough about gun control to make that the drive to go vote. To me, trying to make gun control into 'doing something about mass shootings' doesn't really work as an argument because mass shootings are invariably committed by people who are crazy. There would have to be evidence that the previous perpetrators would have been denied gun ownership before that argument works. Do Democrats have that evidence? And even if they would have been denied, couldn't they have gotten the gun from a relative or online or at a swap meet? The point is that gun control is only questionably effective and very few voters have any real connection to the victims. It is difficult to make them want more regulation for what seems like a shaky policy proposition. And if they enjoy shooting, any gun control argument is going to push them away. I just don't see it as a positive issue at least where I am. I'm in favor of regulations, but very few of my friends or relatives are.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Denigration, negativity, the 'system' is completely fucked so don't trust it. Nothing can be done. It follows the template pretty much perfectly.

This is actually a rather well constructed propaganda piece. Vladi and the god emperor would be pleased.



This thread gave me a few chuckles. Politician's of any variety are out for one thing only and that is feathering their own nests. They don't care about anything beyond retaining and attaining more power. Look how many of them come into office as average Joe's and leave as multi-millionaires. They've got a whole lot of time off. They have bastardized our system to pay for flying them home every weekend and that weekend typically starts sometime on Thursday and ends on Tuesday morning once the sun is up high in the sky.

They make fantastic money, have the best benefits paid for by taxpayers, have expense accounts, staff to do most of their work and lobbyists in droves to actually write any legislation they decide is "needed". Their job is to fund raise for their party. Most of the electorate think all of this is A-OK.

New blood correcting anything is a pipe dream. One bad apple spoiling the bunch is very much in play. And new ideas? There aren't any. The playbook has been utilized from cover to cover with every variation there is. That's why we swing from high times to recessions over and over and over and always will.

We've got a non-politician as president right now and the swamp on both sides of the aisle is doing everything they possibly can to keep him from upsetting the apple cart. They have thrown everything they can at him and despite that he is accomplishing plenty. But the swamp will not stop. President's in the past have been assassinated for less.

Are the people happy? The electorate? How could they possibly be when the corrupt media comes out with two, three, or more stories every day trying to keep simple minds running around with their hair on fire thinking the world is coming to an end because the bullshit the media cranks out meshes with something their teachers or professors have indoctrinated them with. Our educational system turns out idiots that think they're smart, the media keeps them so distracted that they don't have the capacity to recognize good times when those times are staring them right in the face. We're a bad nation doing bad things (that for some odd reason so many want to come to) and the only route to salvation is provided to us by the closeted and in your face Marxists hungering for power is to adopt societal principles that are documented to fail. But hey, it's always new to the latest batch of mush heads that need to get their noggins filled.

There is no fixing this. The system is corrupt from top to bottom. We have received a savior in what is a once in a lifetime occurrence in most people's lives and a huge percentage of the nation is too fucking ignorant to comprehend it. What we get is threads posing the question of what the party last tossed out on their asses should do to cycle us back into the bad times we've left behind. The individual that could really make a huge difference and maybe in two terms put us on the path to resolution is the enemy of the political system and the media. He cannot and must not triumph!

Politician's aren't going to save you from anything. And it appears that a non-politician isn't going to either. That so many want to return to the status quo is proof enough of that.

"A Republic, if you can keep it", said Benjamin Franklin. We've proven we can't.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,218
4,446
136
The lesson, if you ask me, is you still have to put out authentic leftist policy and not avoid answering hard questions. What are we going to do about the non-stop mass shootings, candidate? There has to be an answer or you haemorrhage folks from group number one.

Actually, I think the real answer is that we just need to lie to them. Tell them that you have the answers, they are great answers and everyone is going to love them, and it will be easy and cost us next to nothing. Don't actually tell them the answer, just keep telling them that you know it and how great it is. They have to elect you to find out what it is. Maybe promise a surprise answer to another pressing matter that you will only divulge if you are elected. People are mean and stupid. Play to that.
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,245
2,260
136
We have received a savior in what is a once in a lifetime occurrence in most people's lives and a huge percentage of the nation is too fucking ignorant to comprehend it. What we get is threads posing the question of what the party last tossed out on their asses should do to cycle us back into the bad times we've left behind. The individual that could really make a huge difference and maybe in two terms put us on the path to resolution is the enemy of the political system and the media. .

Glorious news friend. Who is this person? Really looking forward to your response so I can embrace and support them.
 
Last edited:

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Actually, I think the real answer is that we just need to lie to them. Tell them that you have the answers, they are great answers and everyone is going to love them, and it will be easy and cost us next to nothing. Don't actually tell them the answer, just keep telling them that you know it and how great it is. They have to elect you to find out what it is. Maybe promise a surprise answer to another pressing matter that you will only divulge if you are elected. People are mean and stupid. Play to that.
A legitimate option. But this only works for so long, and the Democrats don't possess any persons as devoid of morals and at ease with blatant, insane lying as the Republicans do (a major advantage). Losing again because Democrats aren't as good at lying would be plain embarrassing.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,344
15,154
136
That's a whole lot of nothing just to say, "both sides".

This thread gave me a few chuckles. Politician's of any variety are out for one thing only and that is feathering their own nests. They don't care about anything beyond retaining and attaining more power. Look how many of them come into office as average Joe's and leave as multi-millionaires. They've got a whole lot of time off. They have bastardized our system to pay for flying them home every weekend and that weekend typically starts sometime on Thursday and ends on Tuesday morning once the sun is up high in the sky.

They make fantastic money, have the best benefits paid for by taxpayers, have expense accounts, staff to do most of their work and lobbyists in droves to actually write any legislation they decide is "needed". Their job is to fund raise for their party. Most of the electorate think all of this is A-OK.

New blood correcting anything is a pipe dream. One bad apple spoiling the bunch is very much in play. And new ideas? There aren't any. The playbook has been utilized from cover to cover with every variation there is. That's why we swing from high times to recessions over and over and over and always will.

We've got a non-politician as president right now and the swamp on both sides of the aisle is doing everything they possibly can to keep him from upsetting the apple cart. They have thrown everything they can at him and despite that he is accomplishing plenty. But the swamp will not stop. President's in the past have been assassinated for less.

Are the people happy? The electorate? How could they possibly be when the corrupt media comes out with two, three, or more stories every day trying to keep simple minds running around with their hair on fire thinking the world is coming to an end because the bullshit the media cranks out meshes with something their teachers or professors have indoctrinated them with. Our educational system turns out idiots that think they're smart, the media keeps them so distracted that they don't have the capacity to recognize good times when those times are staring them right in the face. We're a bad nation doing bad things (that for some odd reason so many want to come to) and the only route to salvation is provided to us by the closeted and in your face Marxists hungering for power is to adopt societal principles that are documented to fail. But hey, it's always new to the latest batch of mush heads that need to get their noggins filled.

There is no fixing this. The system is corrupt from top to bottom. We have received a savior in what is a once in a lifetime occurrence in most people's lives and a huge percentage of the nation is too fucking ignorant to comprehend it. What we get is threads posing the question of what the party last tossed out on their asses should do to cycle us back into the bad times we've left behind. The individual that could really make a huge difference and maybe in two terms put us on the path to resolution is the enemy of the political system and the media. He cannot and must not triumph!

Politician's aren't going to save you from anything. And it appears that a non-politician isn't going to either. That so many want to return to the status quo is proof enough of that.

"A Republic, if you can keep it", said Benjamin Franklin. We've proven we can't.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,344
15,154
136
I don't think term limits have worked out the way they were expected to at the state level. The most common complaint I've seen in several states now is that most of the institutional memory shifts to lobbyists who also take a larger role in crafting legislation. That isn't making government more responsive to the people. Instead I would argue that removing the ability of legislators to pick their voters would probably have a bigger impact and apply the same concept to how congressional districts are drawn.

The salary for a member of congress isn't insanely high. Most people who go are already wealthy before they ever run for office. Instead look for ways to make it easier for more average people to run. I honestly think congress worked better when more members moved their families to DC and spent more time building relationships across the aisle. Today's 4 days in DC 3 days in the home district is another thing we have to thank the Newt for.

I agree and I'll add that there should be more members in the house. One congressman to represent 700+ people doesn't really represent anyone at all. Repeal the apportionment act of 1911 that capped the totally amount of house representatives at 453.
That alone would take care of gerrymandering and reduce the costs of running elections for house members and it will raise the entry price for lobbyist to buy politicians.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,591
7,652
136
5. Get candidates that are moderate.
6. Push a moderate platform.

The ACA, "Obamacare" is the moderate platform. Between "!@#$ off and die" and Universal Healthcare. ACA is the market based solution the GOP think tanks pushed in the 90s, and Mitt Romney created in MA. The failure is that ACA did not cover payments. Because apparently a functional insurance is communist, or something.

So... tell me, when we push for actually helping people. For Medicare for All. Will you cry extremism?
 

Guurn

Senior member
Dec 29, 2012
319
30
91
In actually in the camp of...Obama screwed up by not passing it in two waves, the first being obvious things like pre-existing conditions and the second being the harder bits like single payer. He did have both houses for a while.


This thread is like a printed version of why Trump will get a second term.
 
Reactions: SP33Demon

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,523
136
In actually in the camp of...Obama screwed up by not passing it in two waves, the first being obvious things like pre-existing conditions and the second being the harder bits like single payer. He did have both houses for a while.

This thread is like a printed version of why Trump will get a second term.

You can’t exclude pre existing conditions without community rating. You can’t have community rating without subsidies. Obamacare was a three legged stool because that’s the only way it works.

Conservatives are in the process of finding out why the ACA was made the way it was. It sucks to have to try and make public policy while teaching the opposition economics at the same time.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
This fiscal conservative would.

I would too. And I probably have what is considered "good" health insurance (Blue Cross Government Employees group plan). I pay over 500.00 per month in premiums, with a 600.00dollar per year deductible for both my wife and myself, plus a 6000.00 per year "catastrophic" limit. One can expect to pay this for any significant health care incident. For instance my wife was in the hospital one day for a stent, not even surgery, just put in through the vein, and did not even stay overnight. The bill IIRC was 40,000 dollars, so the uncovered portion easily met the 6000 dollar limit.

So basically, the situation is this: I pay close to 7000.00 per year in premiums, 1200.00 in deductibles, and if either my wife or I have a significant surgical or hospital procedure, another 6000 per year in co-pays for surgery, hospital stays, etc. So that means at best, I pay close to 9000.00 thousand dollars a year for health care, and with any kind of significant procedure it will be 15000 per year. How can anyone defend this system?
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
I think we know what the Republican strategy for the next few years is (it's more Trump), so my question to you is: What do you think the Democrats should propose to America in order to win its votes?

I've been mulling this on the airplane trips I've been on lately and scratched out a few notes to get started. Here's five from me:

1. Focus on pushing Medicare For All as not just only the cheaper option, but also the option fiscal conservatives themselves should want. This is easy: Not only does it provably save the nation money, cover more people and have better outcomes, but it allows all of those entreprenurial people hanging in at large companies because it's got healthcare and they have a wife and two kids to quit and start that next 1,000 employee company that makes America better. Medicare For All is a win for everyone, liberals and conservatives alike.

2. Talk up solutions to the mounting issue of jobs only existing in increasingly unaffordable big cities. The vast majority of newly created jobs have occurred in America's top 10 largest cities. This is leading to a housing crisis and is killing off vitally important medium and small cities and towns. One immediate fix is to diffuse the location of federal agencies from Washington D.C. to a variety of cities across the country. There are others... I don't know them. But it needs to be talked up, even just as, "I will get the world's greatest minds on this on day one!" Everyone can identify with a) yeah the city I live in is crazy expensive, b) I hate how long it takes me to commute to the city my job is in or c) there are no jobs in my small town.

3. Focus not on eliminating guns, but on a common sense approach to gun ownership. Guns are a part of the American identity. That's fine. But if you're a domestic abuser, are on a watch list or have serious mental issues, we are going to temporarily withhold the right of gun ownership from you until rehabilitation has occurred (and with Medicare For All...). This will require a better nationwide system of background checks but this can and will be done correctly and without discrimination or intent to repossess all guns from the populace.

4. Focus on the goods of legal immigration, fixing that system, and take a hard stance against illegal immigration. Frankly, calling illegal immigrants "undocumented immigrants" and appearing anywhere near a 'nobody is illegal' stance is a political loser. A winning candidate must come out hard against that in 2018's America. But legal immigration is a huge net gain for the country, so sing it long and hard. It means new employees, new consumers, and new ideas. Push improved use of E-Verify for employers and more legal immigration that doesn't take a million years to happen.

5. Give Trump voters an honourable path back to respectability. Okay, yeah, secretly you can despise them and be horrified that they'd cast a vote for a senile old racist. But a winning candidate must answer every request for comment about Trump or on the various racists, sex offenders, morons and traitors that work for him or in his party with a variation of this one response:

I acknowledge that Candidate Trump who saw in him a possible chance to break from having the same-old in the White House. And he had some genuinely alluring political positions: Bring back jobs and start making things in the USA again. 25 million new jobs. Bring back manufacturing. Run the government more like a business. Simplify everyone's taxes. Spend a trillion on fixing infrastructure. Ban politicians from becoming lobbyists. No more foreign wars. Fire the generals who seem to always tell us a win is one more surge away from happening. Sounds pretty good, actually, I think we can all admit.

But we all know that none of this ever happened; most of it was deliberately made worse. Past that, I don't care. It doesn't matter if a single man is good, evil, ridiculous or presidential. Every minute spent talking about a single man's behaviour is a minute that should have been spent on how we fix the many issues we have in front of us. I will not waste that time and neither should you. Let's talk about the issues and how we can start to fix them.​

This allows Trump voters to say, "Yeah, I voted for him because he said good things, but he didn't follow through so I'm looking for someone who will." Demonizing them or calling them stupid will only entrench them and get them reading more The Federalist and Infowars and turn them full-on crazy. I believe most really want a path with dignity out of Trumpland.

That's my five. What do you think, and what have you got?

So first off, if you want to win you better start thinking like a Rust Belter in a battleground state. Too hard to do? You've already lost then.

1) Medicare for All? Are you fucking nuts? Do you really think Trump voters or any Repubs will cross over to vote for single payer in this lifetime? Why not just call it Medicare Expansion that helps people who are on failing obamacare transition to a safer option but make it help for state based exchanges? Better have all the math handy on this one because there is no way it's happening without a tax increase which Trump will hammer this candidate on. This would honestly be a gift to Trump in the debates, he'll handily destroy any candidate trying to push this to his base.

2) Very good idea on relocating federal agencies, I've actually said this to my friends. Want to fix the FBI? Move it to a red state like GA and any current employee who doesn't like it can resign and gtfo. Regarding jobs, Trump will hit back rather hard on how many manufacturing jobs he's created in small towns in the Rust Belt. I don't think relocating a few agencies is going to be beat Trump at the jobs argument for battleground states - the stats show he's going a fantastic job. Really the only beloved patriot in his armor = wage increases, but that's an entirely different story. Maybe bring up job retraining to convert blue collar to white collar, but oh wait, Trump is already suggesting that... honestly nobody is going to beat Trump on jobs unless the economy takes a huge swing for the worse in the next two years which ain't happening after the yuge 4.1% GDP number that just came in this week.

3) Gun control is a non-issue now with conservatives due to the 3D printer ruling that makes them ubiquitous, esp as printer tech gets fancier and cheaper. People will just laugh at "tougher background checks" when everyone can make them in the comfort of their own home. Gun control is a dead issue, conservatives/anarchists have already won. Also you are forgetting that all states must now comply with either Open Carry or Conceal Carry, pick one. Can't ban both anymore. Maybe propose something to tweak either of these new laws, but guns are already here to stay thanks to Trump's DoJ/9th Circuit.

4) Legal immigration is fine, but what do you mean fix it? You need to clarify more. I agree that taking a hard stance against illegals is the way to go for any candidate that wants to seriously win. If they start whining about Trump and ICE, they're going to lose because the majority of americans are against illegal immigrants regardless of what MSM is trying to brainwash us with. A smarter approach would be to one up Trump using technology at the border and THEN highlight where Trump failed and he could've succeeded had he done [your plan].

5) The problem here with your speech is that Trump actually HAS made a lot of those things happen. There are now more manufacturing jobs than ever in the Rust Belt, hell look at Iowa that has a 180,000 job surplus of positions they'll never fill without people moving there. He hasn't started any wars and in fact wants to pull out of some, and the tax cuts are benefiting everyone in this country. The economy is absolutely humming and he negotiated better deals with countries like Australia, Brazil, South Korea, Argentina, the EU, and now a NAFTA deal with Mexico is about to happen. Cut red tape dramatically like he said he would. Got tougher on ISIS who is virtually wiped out now. NATO allies are going to pay more of their fair share it's been reported. Pulled out TTIP and Paris Accord. Got tougher on all borders via the Travel Ban from certain countries and his illegals border policy has cut down people sneaking in dramatically. All promises made and promises kept.

I do like the respecting Trump voters part. The problem is that liberals are biologically triggered so easily (e.g. see the USC study of 40 liberals) that it's slim odds that any liberal candidate would openly welcome Trump supporters to vote for them. Also they'd risk getting shamed and wrist-slapped by their tribal constituents for even suggesting such a thing. Nice to dream I suppose but I just don't see it happening since the media is brainwashing liberals into hating Trump supporters and idiots like Maxine Waters are openly calling for people to act against them vocally and physically. Pandora's already out of the box.
 
Last edited:

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
^^^

It's amusing watching right wingers tell Dems how to win. I somehow doubt their sincerity.
 
Reactions: esquared

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,245
2,260
136
^^^

It's amusing watching right wingers tell Dems how to win. I somehow doubt their sincerity.
Obviously had never looked up the ebb and flow of political party power. The pendulum is always swinging
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
If the Government can do a better job and it's cheaper to boot, and it enables all citizens to be able to have healthcare, then why not?

My brother in law has suffered from service related epilepsy for many decades. The VA did a crap job but now he had the option of going to a non-governmental institution and his life has improved immeasurably since then. "The Government" is the people in DC who have no idea of what's going on and can't agree that Russians are an enemy or are leaderless floundering for a voice.

In theory it's great, but having dealt with private and public red tape the latter is more onerous, bizarre and obstructive in general.

The government can play a part but running medicine is beyond the comprehension of pols and there's no explaining things to them so they get it right.

Get better people in office who realize that a political solution is counterproductive and can delegate to people who are smarter and better qualified and then I'll revisit the issue.
 
Reactions: UglyCasanova

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,460
1,570
96
My brother in law has suffered from service related epilepsy for many decades. The VA did a crap job but now he had the option of going to a non-governmental institution and his life has improved immeasurably since then. "The Government" is the people in DC who have no idea of what's going on and can't agree that Russians are an enemy or are leaderless floundering for a voice.

In theory it's great, but having dealt with private and public red tape the latter is more onerous, bizarre and obstructive in general.

The government can play a part but running medicine is beyond the comprehension of pols and there's no explaining things to them so they get it right.

Get better people in office who realize that a political solution is counterproductive and can delegate to people who are smarter and better qualified and then I'll revisit the issue.
Well to be clear, I didn't mean the Government actually provides the health care, but simply pays for it.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Show me where our government has done a better job at something.

Food & drug safety.

Automobile safety.

Financial regulation (except Republicans)

Honest weights & measures.

Social Security administrative costs.

Fire & building codes.

Truth in advertising

Fire, police & emergency medical.

Water rights.

Pollution control.

That's just off the top of my head.

And the ACA, obviously.
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
I question whether many of those the government does better, or simply the government the one to do it.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
Well to be clear, I didn't mean the Government actually provides the health care, but simply pays for it.

If that were the case it would be one thing, but there's the golden rule- he who has the gold makes the rules.

Did you know that under Medicare B it is illegal for a local pharmacy to deliver diabetic supplies free of charge, even if the person were disabled, next door and had other items and meds sent? Test strips would have to be taken out of the bag and shelved.

Yep, and this is the consequence of ignorance combined with "simply paying" which is never simple. We need a cohesive infrastructure for a unified system (we don't have one) and making sure providers have means to provide superior care and that's not always about cash.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,344
15,154
136
I question whether many of those the government does better, or simply the government the one to do it.

If no one else does it then obviously the government does it best. Or did you think those things simply aren't free market compatible.
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
I never said they weren’t free market capable. And the free market might perform it better, we don’t know because we just don’t know.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |