Suspicious-Teach8788
Lifer
- Feb 19, 2001
- 20,155
- 23
- 81
all the crying about LTE.
Remember that right now LTE only really is a factor on AT&T and Verizon. Why would they make it VZW compatible meaning it has to work with CDMA when 97% of the world won't benefit from that? Added cost.
So the question boils down to AT&T, but we know that no LTE chip works for both global and AT&T at the moment.
Furthermore LTE isn't really widely deployed worldwide yet.
So tough for you guys on Verizon. You picked a network that had no choice but to go LTE. Early adoption doesn't help unless you stick to VZW phones. SO unless Verizon is going to be a launch partner... forget about it
what 2 other frequencies would they add? 2100? Then what? Something tells me they would put in 850/1900 before 1700.
Remember that right now LTE only really is a factor on AT&T and Verizon. Why would they make it VZW compatible meaning it has to work with CDMA when 97% of the world won't benefit from that? Added cost.
So the question boils down to AT&T, but we know that no LTE chip works for both global and AT&T at the moment.
Furthermore LTE isn't really widely deployed worldwide yet.
So tough for you guys on Verizon. You picked a network that had no choice but to go LTE. Early adoption doesn't help unless you stick to VZW phones. SO unless Verizon is going to be a launch partner... forget about it
why woudl they make it tri band HSPA with AWS support?the prototypes seen so far have been tri-band hspa with support for AWS, so yes, they would work on tmobile.
what 2 other frequencies would they add? 2100? Then what? Something tells me they would put in 850/1900 before 1700.