LGBT Executive Order Potentially Incoming

[Sheik Yerbouti]

So again, you say minorities are only to be tolerated if their members do things that you agree with.

nope, not even close, but spin it however you'd like, you appear to be a drumpf-fluffer, so facts are useless as you now have #alternativefacts

 

[dank69]

Liberal tolerance of minorities at its finest.

Who said anything about tolerance? Just you I'm afraid. I certainly didn't say anything about tolerance.

 

[Double Trouble]

Right, because this thread is about a Muslim ban not anti-gay executive orders.

What anti-gay executive orders are you referring to? The ones that are a figment of the imagination of Trump haters?

 

[dphantom]

there is no muslim ban...

I am glad you now agree.

 

[Phynaz]

nope, not even close, but spin it however you'd like, you appear to be a drumpf-fluffer, so facts are useless as you now have #alternativefacts

Oh look, another Liberal that can't follow logic without getting all emotional. Do you feel better about yourself now that you have attempted to marginalize me (incorrectly) into a stereotypical group that makes you feel justified to hate people?

Again, I thought Liberals were all about inclusion. Isn't social diversity one of the Liberal calling cards? I guess Liberals can only handle diversity that isn't diverse.

 

[Phynaz]

Who said anything about tolerance? Just you I'm afraid. I certainly didn't say anything about tolerance.

You're even dumber than I thought if you think laughing at the misfortune of minorities is tolerating them.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I am glad you now agree.

way to take it out of context spicer

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Oh look, another Liberal that can't follow logic without getting all emotional. Do you feel better about yourself now that you have attempted to marginalize me (incorrectly) into a stereotypical group that makes you feel justified to hate people?

Again, I thought Liberals were all about inclusion. Isn't social diversity one of the Liberal calling cards? I guess Liberals can only handle diversity that isn't diverse.

spin and spin and spin and spin, watch the little drumpf-bot spin and spin.

 

[dank69]

You're even dumber than I thought if you think laughing at the misfortune of minorities is tolerating them.

I see. So if I laugh when an old lady slips and falls on ice it means I don't tolerate old ladies. Thank you for setting me straight.

 

[Phynaz]

spin and spin and spin and spin, watch the little drumpf-bot spin and spin.

Awesome way to argue a point.

I wish there was a way to automatically put people on ignore if their IQ is below 80. Sure would eliminate a lot of proggie noise.

Then the at least passably intelligent of us could discuss facts.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Awesome way to argue a point.

I wish there was a way to automatically put people on ignore if their IQ is below 80. Sure would eliminate a lot of proggie noise.

you don't argue, you just regurgitate talking points. And it's cute that you ridiculed me for incorrectly stereotyping you, yet you feel you can stereotype me, correctly or incorrectly.
Hypocrite much?

 

[repoman0]

Awesome way to argue a point.

I wish there was a way to automatically put people on ignore if their IQ is below 80. Sure would eliminate a lot of proggie noise.

Then the at least passably intelligent of us could discuss facts.

Do you imagine you qualify as passably intelligent with an excellent ability to argue a point?

Squawk!! Squawk, Squawk Squawk. Squawk!!!

Polly want another cracker?

 

[nakedfrog]

Fifth option:
You're an idiot.

Liberal tolerance of minorities at its finest.

He's laughing at minorities. I thought Liberals were tolerant and inclusive of minorities.

I see. So it's ok to laugh at the misfortune of a black lesbian woman just because of who she thought would be the better president.

But, it's not ok to laugh at the misfortune of a black lesbian woman if she checked a different box on a sheet of paper. Because laughing at the misfortune of minorities in this country would be wrong and intolerant.

Logic continues to defy you.

I'm not a Republican, dumbass.

So again, you say minorities are only to be tolerated if their members do things that you agree with.

Oh look, another Liberal that can't follow logic without getting all emotional. Do you feel better about yourself now that you have attempted to marginalize me (incorrectly) into a stereotypical group that makes you feel justified to hate people?

Again, I thought Liberals were all about inclusion. Isn't social diversity one of the Liberal calling cards? I guess Liberals can only handle diversity that isn't diverse.

You're even dumber than I thought if you think laughing at the misfortune of minorities is tolerating them.

Awesome way to argue a point.

I wish there was a way to automatically put people on ignore if their IQ is below 80. Sure would eliminate a lot of proggie noise.

Then the at least passably intelligent of us could discuss facts.

This is literally every post you have made in this thread. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that you are not here to discuss facts.

 

[Phynaz]

you don't argue, you just regurgitate talking points. And it's cute that you ridiculed me for incorrectly stereotyping you, yet you feel you can stereotype me, correctly or incorrectly.
Hypocrite much?

I didn't say you were a proggie, did you just put yourself in that category?

Read much?

 

[Scooby Doo]

Wait till the current shitstorm settles down.. then we'll see.

 

[Victorian Gray]

I'm not a Republican, dumbass.

Too liberal for you?

 

[dead_smiley]

Tell that to the jihadists who are already using Trump's Executive Order to recruit more terrorists to kill Americans at home and abroad.

So.... you are suggesting that we should allow people in our country that are willing to kill us for not letting them in our country?

 

[zinfamous]

What anti-gay executive orders are you referring to? The ones that are a figment of the imagination of Trump haters?

quoted for posterity.

 

[zinfamous]

So.... you are suggesting that we should allow people in our country that are willing to kill us for not letting them in our country?

your attempt at a smart failed with your own logic, my friend. Here, let me bold the problem ^

You see, you have created a new class of terrorists--those that want to kill us for us not letting them in the country. You see the problem? These people would not exist were it not for Bannon/Trump's ban of muslims. This order created those very people that you say mean to do us harm, but you think the order should work by not letting in those people that otherwise would not have existed were it not for that very same order that created them!

So, yes, you agree that this order creates even more terrorists. But why do you justify its existence by saying that it is now needed because it has created even more terrorists?

This is strange.

 

[norseamd]

In other news. Husband continues to not abuse wife. Questions remain as to when he will start though, only time will tell.

Seriously guys. Trump is hugely into LGBTQIA+ rights and the community adores him.

It's possible though that this the gaslighting that the article was talking about. Not defying reality, in the sense of inauguration sizes, but manipulating the press into running off with stories of wild rumors of insane proportions, getting people to believe them, and then come out and say they support it all along. Media loses points, Trump can act baffled at the medias astounding collective stupidity on the matter, and the public is left bewildered and confused.

I started realizing that last night actually. Much of the world broadbrushes this whole administration as absolute complete dumbshits, but I think it is very dangerous to be ignorant of them and continue to underestimate them. We have to remember they did win the presidency after all. And they are known to have at least some quite sophisticated operations, so they may be looking to pull one over on us.

 

[dead_smiley]

your attempt at a smart failed with your own logic, my friend. Here, let me bold the problem ^

You see, you have created a new class of terrorists--those that want to kill us for us not letting them in the country. You see the problem? These people would not exist were it not for Bannon/Trump's ban of muslims. This order created those very people that you say mean to do us harm, but you think the order should work by not letting in those people that otherwise would not have existed were it not for that very same order that created them!

So, yes, you agree that this order creates even more terrorists. But why do you justify its existence by saying that it is now needed because it has created even more terrorists?

This is strange.

Yes it is strange. The very idea that we "create" Jhadist by simply vetting Muslims from certain countries is preposterous. Especially since the Dems have done this before.

So is it Dems and Bannon/Trump, or just Bannon/Trump that is the problem?

https://www.conservativereview.com/...ing&utm_medium=social&utm_content=013117visas

This ban is temporary for 120 days while we strengthen our vetting process. After that, it caps the number of refugees entering the country at 50,000/year which is about what is was before Obama accelerated that rate while he was in office.

But I have feeling my comments won't make a dent.

 

[agent00f]

That wasn't a photo shop. I was watching the event when he was given and held it up. Nice try at the lie. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nJ5JwLdU4

Hilarious case of friendly fire aside (hint: baydude is of your own), the leader of Trumpsters holding up a rainbow flag is about akin to him bragging about his black friend.

I hope it is true. I'm laughing at all the minorities that voted for Trump. I'll laugh harder every time he fucks them over like this.

Not necessarily. Given how the conservative race hierarchy works, if someone looks like Rubio or this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hector_Barreto, they still might be better off than the lower status mexicans Trump-sorts like to go after.

 

[agent00f]

Yes it is strange. The very idea that we "create" Jhadist by simply vetting Muslims from certain countries is preposterous. Especially since the Dems have done this before.

So is it Dems and Bannon/Trump, or just Bannon/Trump that is the problem?

https://www.conservativereview.com/...ing&utm_medium=social&utm_content=013117visas

This ban is temporary for 120 days while we strengthen our vetting process. After that, it caps the number of refugees entering the country at 50,000/year which is about what is was before Obama accelerated that rate while he was in office.

But I have feeling my comments won't make a dent.

Ponder for a while what you're implying here, that the election of Trump is a disaster on par with 9/11 that warrants a similar knee jerk response.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Hilarious case of friendly fire aside (hint: baydude is of your own), the leader of Trumpsters holding up a rainbow flag is about akin to him bragging about his black friend african american.

<snip>

ftfy
and added a picture!

 

[dead_smiley]

Ponder for a while what you're implying here, that the election of Trump is a disaster on par with 9/11 that warrants a similar knee jerk response.

Nice dodge, but I am not implying any such thing.