libertarian party vp candidate endorses...

[JSt0rm]

Hillary! buahahahahaah. GOP is broken. Cant wait to see who they put up in 4 years.

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/10...election-stuns-america-with-2016-endorsement/

 

[herm0016]

actually he did not. the media is trying to spin it that way though. He said trump is terrible and you should not vote for him. I am certain he would rather you vote for johnson/weld than Hill.
exibit 437 on how the media messes with your mind.

 

[EOM]

A citizenry ruled by headlines....

 

[JSt0rm]

actually he did not. the media is trying to spin it that way though. He said trump is terrible and you should not vote for him. I am certain he would rather you vote for johnson/weld than Hill.
exibit 437 on how the media messes with your mind.

Ok not voting for trump means what exactly in the real world?

 

[dank69]

actually he did not. the media is trying to spin it that way though. He said trump is terrible and you should not vote for him. I am certain he would rather you vote for johnson/weld than Hill.
exibit 437 on how the media messes with your mind.

Depends on how you interpret the following line:

This is not the time to cast a jocular or feel-good vote for a man whom you may have briefly found entertaining.

If that refers to Johnson, which I think it does, then it is perfectly logical to conclude that he is recommending everyone vote for Hillary.

 

[hal2kilo]

It's the end of the world. First, Bernie and now.....wah!!!!!!

 

[glenn1]

I guess Bill Weld is getting his wish because I can't think of any Libertarian who would vote for Trump. I can't think of any Libertarian who would vote for Clinton either but I suppose you might have gotten some 'sorta kinda' squishy folks who are Democrat leaners anyway who might get coaxed back. I'd say for the average "true" libertarian that Clinton is above Trump but they'd still be our last two choices of the four most plausible candidates (Johnson, Stein, Clinton, Trump).

 

[herm0016]

Ok not voting for trump means what exactly in the real world?

it means, and i quoting you here...."not voting for trump"

 

[herm0016]

Depends on how you interpret the following line:

If that refers to Johnson, which I think it does, then it is perfectly logical to conclude that he is recommending everyone vote for Hillary.

it refers to trump... that's what hes talking about... omg people. I seem to have missed the class where they teach you to interject what you think people say into what they really say.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Just more proof the Libertarian Party is a hot mess with little organization.

 

[hal2kilo]

Just more proof the Libertarian Party is a hot mess with little organization.

Well, what do you expect from people that do not believe in organizing anything but themselves.

 

[dank69]

it refers to trump... that's what hes talking about... omg people. I seem to have missed the class where they teach you to interject what you think people say into what they really say.

So you think people found Trump "briefly entertaining"? Trumps supporters are die-hard. You think his supporters consider trump to be jocular?

It's seems pretty clear to me the only person treating the race in a jocular manner is Johnson:

 

[DaveSimmons]

Weld did already admit last month that Clinton was the most qualified candidate:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/bill-weld-hillary-clinton-qualified/

 

[glenn1]

Weld did already admit last month that Clinton was the most qualified candidate:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/bill-weld-hillary-clinton-qualified/

I disagree with that. While she is clearly more qualified than Trump, Clinton's 1+ term in the Senate and 4 years as SoS makes her about equally qualified as Johnson or Weld and their business backgrounds and two terms each as governor. It really just comes down to personal preference whether you prefer legislative/cabinet experience on one hand, or executive experience on the other.

 

[JSt0rm]

it means, and i quoting you here...."not voting for trump"

it means Hillary is better then trump... to libertarians.

 

[glenn1]

it means Hillary is better then trump... to libertarians.

Q: Would you rather be kicked in the head or the balls?
A: I'm certainly not going to agree to get kicked in the head.
Q: Aha! That means kicked in the balls is better to libertarians.

Only foolish partisans would get excited out of "well both candidates are completely unacceptable, but A is a slightly better degree of unaccceptable!

 

[JSt0rm]

Q: Would you rather be kicked in the head or the balls?
A: I'm certainly not going to agree to get kicked in the head.
Q: Aha! That means kicked in the balls is better to libertarians.

Only foolish partisans would get excited out of "well both candidates are completely unacceptable, but A is a slightly better degree of unaccceptable!

Most of us think she is way better not just slightly better. Nice try though.

 

[JSt0rm]

and lol at glenn admitting Hillary is slightly better then trump.

 

[DaveSimmons]

I disagree with that. While she is clearly more qualified than Trump, Clinton's 1+ term in the Senate and 4 years as SoS makes her about equally qualified as Johnson or Weld and their business backgrounds and two terms each as governor. It really just comes down to personal preference whether you prefer legislative/cabinet experience on one hand, or executive experience on the other.

Note that you're disagreeing with your own VP candidate though

I'm not excited by any of the candidates To me Clinton seems like the one who will do the least damage and possibly a small amount of good.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Problem with Weld is as Sam Kinnesson said "He's a heavy fucking drinker"

 

[soulcougher73]

Hook, line and sinker. Sorry OP

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Seriously people used to leave the Governors mansion and get stopped by the cops, they were playing cards with the Governor until early in the morning. This happened more than once.