Originally posted by: Marlin1975
I am kinda against it as it stands now. I would be for a line item if it was that a line item veto can be overturned by simple majority but still hold that a full veto needs 2/3 majority.
It still removes the primary means of compromise that allows things to get done in the legislature. Who's going to agree to a deal with other legislators that the president can just remove if he feels like it?
Anyways it doesn't matter. It's massively unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers. This argument was settled years ago.