Link me Affordable healthcare.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Sclamoz
Originally posted by: blackangst1

Uh, you obviously are aping talking points from...somewhere. I linked a plan for about $100/mo, with no lifetime max, and pre-existing covered. And this was just after 10 mins looking. Get your facts straight.

The plan you listed had a copay insurance of 30%.

For example it lists:

Emergency Room$100 Copay (waived if admitted) plus 30% Coinsurance Outpatient Lab/X-Ray30% Outpatient Surgery30% Hospitalization30%

If I understand copay insurance correctly that means you would be responsible for paying 30% of those bills and that's only if Aetna agreed to pay in the first place.


Also, that plan is not available everywhere. Where I live the cheapest plan according to Ehealthinsurance is from Fallon at $206 a month AND a $2000 deductible.

And there's the catch, blackangst is full of crap yet again

And there's YOUR catch phukus. You fail at reading.

As usual.

This coming from the guy who read this http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/e...=1002521<=eng_news as thinking they were talking about taiwan's deficit and not america's

The fact that you idiots read the front page and not the fine print of these health plans tells me a lot about how you morons think.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Arite OP, you're 23. I just turned 23, but I did a quote for myself a few months ago when P&N had 20 threads about UHC on the front page. I was 22 then, but close enough to 23. I quoted for the same plan I have now which is a:

HSA + HDHP. I got two plans at 73 and 78/month. A PPO plan was closer to 90s. This is for Kaiser BTW, and I did a search for Anthem Blue Cross which I used to have and I got similar rates. Affordable enough for you?

I think so.

I am thinking of applying for grad school. I don't know how that will affect me. Do I need to go with my school for shit insurance or can I go under my parents again? Hmmm.
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Arite OP, you're 23. I just turned 23, but I did a quote for myself a few months ago when P&N had 20 threads about UHC on the front page. I was 22 then, but close enough to 23. I quoted for the same plan I have now which is a:

HSA + HDHP. I got two plans at 73 and 78/month. A PPO plan was closer to 90s. This is for Kaiser BTW, and I did a search for Anthem Blue Cross which I used to have and I got similar rates. Affordable enough for you?

I think so.

I am thinking of applying for grad school. I don't know how that will affect me. Do I need to go with my school for shit insurance or can I go under my parents again? Hmmm.

Most plans have an age cap for dependents. My parent's plan capped at age 22, so I had to use the school's plan for my final year of undergrad.
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
...so you are poor... apply for medicade... that's the direction this is all going in, anyways... but then you will want more than medicade provides...

what cracks me up is that y'all think that anything that congress does will be any better than what's in place today... if u r poor and/or destitute, go on the dole...

and here's the path for you: go to an urgent care to get your symptoms looked at. if you have something seriously wrong then you won't be going to school any more and can get on your public plan...

and as for an affordable plan, i got my 23 yo son a plan in mi for around @100 a month. it's catastrophic care, they kick in when you get to the medicade point above...

this shit ain't free... you want 'affordable'? then maybe you don't get all the hot shit that's available... from your scenario above you want 'free'...

ask your congressfolks to add a few more pages to the bill to let anyone in school full time get medicade...
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: cubeless

this shit ain't free... you want 'affordable'? then maybe you don't get all the hot shit that's available... from your scenario above you want 'free'...

ask your congressfolks to add a few more pages to the bill to let anyone in school full time get medicade...

Has a single person in this thread said UHC=free health care?

Oh, no there haven't been any posts like that at all, because everyone that's posted is over the age of freaking 6years old and knows better. You're the only tool posting that it's free.


 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
180 per month for my entire family with virtually nothing out of pocket...ever, nowadays is pretty freakin cheap. Army, Navy, Air force and Marine Reserves. You don't even have to be ina network or see military doctors.

Just over 300 per month for federal employees for similar to military.

University students are normally covered for virtually nothing in comparison.

Wal-Mart is just about 350 for a well-covered program.

Cell phone plans are about 70-80 per month; HS internet= 35; cable or Sat. TV = 55-90. Drop those and most health care is not so bad as most peoples car payments, (or opverpriced mortgages).

We all want our cake AND eat it too. Put up or shut up and work for your country seems to be the best deal. If you don't want that, go to work for Walmart or go back to school. Other than that, you have to go after costs in the hospitals. How many illegals pay for health care? ZERO! That's the first thing we can do to cut health care costs.



 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: maluckey
180 per month for my entire family with virtually nothing out of pocket...ever, nowadays is pretty freakin cheap. Army, Navy, Air force and Marine Reserves. You don't even have to be ina network or see military doctors.

Just over 300 per month for federal employees for similar to military.

University students are normally covered for virtually nothing in comparison.

Wal-Mart is just about 350 for a well-covered program.

Cell phone plans are about 70-80 per month; HS internet= 35; cable or Sat. TV = 55-90. Drop those and most health care is not so bad as most peoples car payments, (or opverpriced mortgages).

We all want our cake AND eat it too. Put up or shut up and work for your country seems to be the best deal. If you don't want that, go to work for Walmart or go back to school. Other than that, you have to go after costs in the hospitals. How many illegals pay for health care? ZERO! That's the first thing we can do to cut health care costs.

Try getting those type of policies without the subsidies that the employer is paying and see what you get.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Here....
http://www.anthem.com/

Rate quotes for someone living in Chesapeake Va.
Highest rate is $194
Lowest is $73

The plans most people would pick ranges from $89 - $126 a month.

Is that affordable enough?

...For a plan with 20% coinsurance that will bankrupt you at your first major procedure. No Thanks.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: ebaycj
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Here....
http://www.anthem.com/

Rate quotes for someone living in Chesapeake Va.
Highest rate is $194
Lowest is $73

The plans most people would pick ranges from $89 - $126 a month.

Is that affordable enough?

...For a plan with 20% coinsurance that will bankrupt you at your first major procedure. No Thanks.

I believe you are confused about health insurance. Most policies have a stop-loss limit built in to them. 20% doesnt normally mean 20% of everything no matter what.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Do you not see the problem you just said? You basically said "Choose school or choose your health." Without school, he'll be unable to participate in the economy and actually earn health insurance. On the other hand, if he falls ill and has to receive any sort of health care, he's out of luck because he can't afford health care. He's in a Catch-22 situation.

Comparing health insurance to an OLED or a sportscar is simply ignorant. Health insurance is just as important as food, water, shelter, clothing. Secondly, while internet/phone may be strictly optional, in the real world, it's extremely difficult to live without them. I can see living without internet, as there are many free options out there (library, computer labs), but without a cell phone is really stretching it.

Your post basically highlights why we need major healthcare reform in this country.

I see nothing wrong with what I said. You choose school or health insurance. Just like I choose to go running with my dog or fix the refrigerator door. Choices have to be made, and priorities set. As a poster in this thread already said, even working part time at Walmart can get you decent health insurance. Of course, the OP wants GREAT insurance for free.

Health insurance, food, water, shelter, clothing, OLEDs and sports cars are all just things. There's a limit supply of all of them. They have value. You have to pick and choose what you're going to expend your resources on.
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: cubeless

this shit ain't free... you want 'affordable'? then maybe you don't get all the hot shit that's available... from your scenario above you want 'free'...

ask your congressfolks to add a few more pages to the bill to let anyone in school full time get medicade...

Has a single person in this thread said UHC=free health care?

Oh, no there haven't been any posts like that at all, because everyone that's posted is over the age of freaking 6years old and knows better. You're the only tool posting that it's free.

this is like a townhall meeting... i comment, you call names...

the issue is that someone wants product, but wants to pay some 'affordable' amount for it (of course less than the market price)... so when his taxes go up $100 a month to pay for a plan for everybody (or he gets fined for not buying a plan) then all is well...

i say lets just do it... fuck everybody in the whole hc insurance industry, fire 'em all and put everyone on medicade tomorrow... that ought to work out nicely... maybe they can get jobs with the govt in the medicade office... then just keep cranking taxes until it's funded...

 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: cubeless
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: cubeless

this shit ain't free... you want 'affordable'? then maybe you don't get all the hot shit that's available... from your scenario above you want 'free'...

ask your congressfolks to add a few more pages to the bill to let anyone in school full time get medicade...

Has a single person in this thread said UHC=free health care?

Oh, no there haven't been any posts like that at all, because everyone that's posted is over the age of freaking 6years old and knows better. You're the only tool posting that it's free.

this is like a townhall meeting... i comment, you call names...

the issue is that someone wants product, but wants to pay some 'affordable' amount for it (of course less than the market price)... so when his taxes go up $100 a month to pay for a plan for everybody (or he gets fined for not buying a plan) then all is well...

I think $100/month is a small price to pay...
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: cubeless
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: cubeless

this shit ain't free... you want 'affordable'? then maybe you don't get all the hot shit that's available... from your scenario above you want 'free'...

ask your congressfolks to add a few more pages to the bill to let anyone in school full time get medicade...

Has a single person in this thread said UHC=free health care?

Oh, no there haven't been any posts like that at all, because everyone that's posted is over the age of freaking 6years old and knows better. You're the only tool posting that it's free.

this is like a townhall meeting... i comment, you call names...

the issue is that someone wants product, but wants to pay some 'affordable' amount for it (of course less than the market price)... so when his taxes go up $100 a month to pay for a plan for everybody (or he gets fined for not buying a plan) then all is well...

I think $100/month is a small price to pay...

but that's more than he was willing to pay... and i meant $100 for someone who's not even paying taxes... my taxes will go up $1000's...

 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
You little boys talking about how affordable health care is are just so cute.

Tell the truth, do you don't really believe all that crap you spout? If there were really good and affordable healthcare options out there for everyone do you think health costs would be front and center stage in this country?

Get real.

It's a big deal because the media and the current administration want it to be a big deal. Why wasn't a big deal when Bush was in office? Same reason.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Steve, is the government option going to provide you with affordable healthcare?

If we added up the total cost of the government option and then divided by the number of people covered by the plan would we end up with a number that is smaller than what it will cost you to get insurance on your own?? Probably not.

Medicare currently covers 43 million Americans and cost the government $413 billion in FY 2009 that is a cost of nearly $10,000 for every person covered.

Can you go out and buy individual insurance for less than $10,000 per year?

Medicare isn't exactly a good example of what Government insurance would cost for everyone since Medicare covers the elderly, people practically guaranteed to get sick and need expensive care. If it was covering the entire population, the cost per person would be a lot lower.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
You little boys talking about how affordable health care is are just so cute.

Tell the truth, do you don't really believe all that crap you spout? If there were really good and affordable healthcare options out there for everyone do you think health costs would be front and center stage in this country?

Get real.

It's a big deal because the media and the current administration want it to be a big deal. Why wasn't a big deal when Bush was in office? Same reason.

It is a big deal because the bottom is about to fall out. Think the mortgage crisis, except people dieing.

The thing I can't wait for is when the shit does start to hit the fan, all the Repubnants complaining about the Demo's in office not doing anything.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Steve, is the government option going to provide you with affordable healthcare?

If we added up the total cost of the government option and then divided by the number of people covered by the plan would we end up with a number that is smaller than what it will cost you to get insurance on your own?? Probably not.

Medicare currently covers 43 million Americans and cost the government $413 billion in FY 2009 that is a cost of nearly $10,000 for every person covered.

Can you go out and buy individual insurance for less than $10,000 per year?

Medicare isn't exactly a good example of what Government insurance would cost for everyone since Medicare covers the elderly, people practically guaranteed to get sick and need expensive care. If it was covering the entire population, the cost per person would be a lot lower.

Not to mention horribly bloated and ridden with fraud. Which is exactly what I want with my healthcare.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: Zstream
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Steve, is the government option going to provide you with affordable healthcare?

If we added up the total cost of the government option and then divided by the number of people covered by the plan would we end up with a number that is smaller than what it will cost you to get insurance on your own?? Probably not.

Medicare currently covers 43 million Americans and cost the government $413 billion in FY 2009 that is a cost of nearly $10,000 for every person covered.

Can you go out and buy individual insurance for less than $10,000 per year?

Greater than 2/3 of the civilized world has found a way. WHY CAN'T WE?

Who the heck you think is doing R&D? Any business or Government for that matter will have to put research into R&D or you will be dead in a few years.

Oh and why cant you get a part time job and then have the employer provide Health care with a good tax break?

If you want some free insurance then the government can throw you a little piece, say cover 80% of expenses for the first six months of unemployment. If you can not find a job in six months to get the employer HC, you will go into a 40% bracket for six months. After a year, the cost will remain 40% for a total of a two year period. After that, a 20% coverage and 40% for medicine. Every step of the way you need proof of trying to be hired.

Either way, I or someone else will be paying for your HC.

There are ways to do this without providing everyone Government run HC!

Even with the last paragraph, it is evident we are doing a majority of R&D in the medical field.


http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c4/c4s4.htm
http://www.msfaccess.org/



R&D expenditures in the United States alone account for roughly 44 percent of all OECD member countries' combined R&D investments


1. Global spending on health research is skewed towards wealthy markets
Global spending on medical innovation has increased dramatically from US$ 30 billion in 1986 to US$ 105.9 billion today. This may seem good news. But a closer look shows how 90% of this money is spent on the health problems of less than 10% of the world?s population. This is commonly referred to as the 10/90 gap.

The overwhelming majority of pharmaceutical industry profits come from wealthy countries. 87% of the world?s pharmaceutical market ? the US$ 518 billion made each year from drug sales - is made in North America, the European Union and Japan.

And you think our high insurance and health care costs are because of R&D? LOL. The NIH and state universities churn out billions of dollars worth of research, all on the taxpayer's dime. Pharma takes the successful research and uses it to develop products.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
The other first world countries pay 1/2 what we pay and cover everyone for everything... they pay about 6-10% extra in healthcare. I'm 27, married , with one child, and we pay about 20% of our income on health insurance, not counting copays and deductibles.

Oh, I am self-employed. I guess we should shut down small businesses and have everyone work for big companies, right? That has worked so well over the last year...
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The other first world countries pay 1/2 what we pay and cover everyone for everything... they pay about 6-10% extra in healthcare. I'm 27, married , with one child, and we pay about 20% of our income on health insurance, not counting copays and deductibles.

Oh, I am self-employed. I guess we should shut down small businesses and have everyone work for big companies, right? That has worked so well over the last year...

Not catastrophic they dont.
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Do you not see the problem you just said? You basically said "Choose school or choose your health." Without school, he'll be unable to participate in the economy and actually earn health insurance. On the other hand, if he falls ill and has to receive any sort of health care, he's out of luck because he can't afford health care. He's in a Catch-22 situation.

Comparing health insurance to an OLED or a sportscar is simply ignorant. Health insurance is just as important as food, water, shelter, clothing. Secondly, while internet/phone may be strictly optional, in the real world, it's extremely difficult to live without them. I can see living without internet, as there are many free options out there (library, computer labs), but without a cell phone is really stretching it.

Your post basically highlights why we need major healthcare reform in this country.

I see nothing wrong with what I said. You choose school or health insurance. Just like I choose to go running with my dog or fix the refrigerator door. Choices have to be made, and priorities set. As a poster in this thread already said, even working part time at Walmart can get you decent health insurance. Of course, the OP wants GREAT insurance for free.

Health insurance, food, water, shelter, clothing, OLEDs and sports cars are all just things. There's a limit supply of all of them. They have value. You have to pick and choose what you're going to expend your resources on.

Somethings are necessary and some things are luxury items. If we were arguing about whether or not OLED TVs should be sacrificed for health insurance, I'd hope that everyone would be reasonable. However, when it comes to something like school vs health insurance, there is no right answer. You can't sacrifice your future for health, but you can't sacrifice your health for your future. And secondly, I don't think that working at Wal-Mart is a smart choice in order to provide yourself/family with health insurance.

The real tragedy is that every modern country has been able to provide healthcare to it's citizens, for less money than what we spend on only a fraction of the population. We are quite obviously doing something fundamentally wrong.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The other first world countries pay 1/2 what we pay and cover everyone for everything... they pay about 6-10% extra in healthcare. I'm 27, married , with one child, and we pay about 20% of our income on health insurance, not counting copays and deductibles.

Oh, I am self-employed. I guess we should shut down small businesses and have everyone work for big companies, right? That has worked so well over the last year...

Not catastrophic they dont.

I had catastrophic for myself only last year for $150 a month.. which is 1800 a year for just me. Catastrophic for the 3 of us would have been $5400 for catastrophic only. No coverage for doctor visits, prescriptions, etc.

For $9-10,000 I get everything covered and pre-existing conditions because we moved to a progressive state from a hick state(fl). With a child you don't skimp out.

$9-10k for families of 3, with a median income of $40k in this country, is the equivalent of 25% income tax. $5k for catastrophic only would be 12.5%.

Other countries pay 6-10%, everyone is covered for absolutely everything, no one is denied pre-existing conditions or dropped because they are not profitable enough.

If you made$ 100k, 10k is still 10%, and you still pay copays. Catastrophic would be 5% and covers nothing but hospitals. Again, compare this to 6-10% for other countries that cover every single thing with no copays, no pre-existing conditions, and no chance of coverage being dropped.


Next?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The other first world countries pay 1/2 what we pay and cover everyone for everything... they pay about 6-10% extra in healthcare. I'm 27, married , with one child, and we pay about 20% of our income on health insurance, not counting copays and deductibles.

Oh, I am self-employed. I guess we should shut down small businesses and have everyone work for big companies, right? That has worked so well over the last year...

Not catastrophic they dont.

I had catastrophic for myself only last year for $150 a month.. which is 1800 a year for just me. Catastrophic for the 3 of us would have been $5400 for catastrophic only. No coverage for doctor visits, prescriptions, etc.

For $9-10,000 I get everything covered and pre-existing conditions because we moved to a progressive state from a hick state(fl). With a child you don't skimp out.

$9-10k for families of 3, with a median income of $40k in this country, is the equivalent of 25% income tax. $5k for catastrophic only would be 12.5%.

Other countries pay 6-10%, everyone is covered for absolutely everything, no one is denied pre-existing conditions or dropped because they are not profitable enough.

If you made$ 100k, 10k is still 10%, and you still pay copays. Catastrophic would be 5% and covers nothing but hospitals. Again, compare this to 6-10% for other countries that cover every single thing with no copays, no pre-existing conditions, and no chance of coverage being dropped.


Next?

I do know in the UK you can be denied NHS coverage if you opt for additional private insurance (and why ARE there private insurance companies offering everything from maintenance care to catastrophic care if NHS pays for everything???). Also, after reading THIS Im not sure its so great.

edit: Yeah youre gonna want an example. HERE is one.. Grandmother dies after NHS cancer treatment is withdrawn because she paid privately for life-extending drug






 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
The other first world countries pay 1/2 what we pay and cover everyone for everything... they pay about 6-10% extra in healthcare. I'm 27, married , with one child, and we pay about 20% of our income on health insurance, not counting copays and deductibles.

Oh, I am self-employed. I guess we should shut down small businesses and have everyone work for big companies, right? That has worked so well over the last year...

Not catastrophic they dont.

I had catastrophic for myself only last year for $150 a month.. which is 1800 a year for just me. Catastrophic for the 3 of us would have been $5400 for catastrophic only. No coverage for doctor visits, prescriptions, etc.

For $9-10,000 I get everything covered and pre-existing conditions because we moved to a progressive state from a hick state(fl). With a child you don't skimp out.

$9-10k for families of 3, with a median income of $40k in this country, is the equivalent of 25% income tax. $5k for catastrophic only would be 12.5%.

Other countries pay 6-10%, everyone is covered for absolutely everything, no one is denied pre-existing conditions or dropped because they are not profitable enough.

If you made$ 100k, 10k is still 10%, and you still pay copays. Catastrophic would be 5% and covers nothing but hospitals. Again, compare this to 6-10% for other countries that cover every single thing with no copays, no pre-existing conditions, and no chance of coverage being dropped.


Next?

I do know in the UK you can be denied NHS coverage if you opt for additional private insurance (and why ARE there private insurance companies offering everything from maintenance care to catastrophic care if NHS pays for everything???). Also, after reading THIS Im not sure its so great.

I just explained how your suggestion that catastrophic coverage was much cheaper was ill informed...

I don't get the leap to the idea that if you choose a private insurance, you won't be part of their public insurance...

Our costs compared to everyone else's costs are super inflated and we get much much less. We also get excluded and denied on a daily basis so that companies can make a profit off of our suffering.

No system is perfect. But paying half the cost so that every american will be covered for everything is worth changing to. No system is perfect, but it sure can't get worse than here.


"Grandmother dies after NHS cancer treatment is withdrawn because she paid privately for life-extending drug "

If someone chooses to ignore the rules of the system, that is their fault. Here, we get denied because 20 years ago we had acne that wasn't reported. There they get denied because they did something they weren't supposed to do. Huge difference.

Do you have any idea how many americans are currently either never checked for cancer in the first place(uninsured, too expensive) or get denied cancer treatment with no recourse by our corporations, which are designed to deny claims for their profits?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9


I just explained how your suggestion that catastrophic coverage was much cheaper was ill informed...

I don't get the leap to the idea that if you choose a private insurance, you won't be part of their public insurance...

Our costs compared to everyone else's costs are super inflated and we get much much less. We also get excluded and denied on a daily basis so that companies can make a profit off of our suffering.

No system is perfect. But paying half the cost so that every american will be covered for everything is worth changing to. No system is perfect, but it sure can't get worse than here.


"Grandmother dies after NHS cancer treatment is withdrawn because she paid privately for life-extending drug "

If someone chooses to ignore the rules of the system, that is their fault. Here, we get denied because 20 years ago we had acne that wasn't reported. There they get denied because they did something they weren't supposed to do. Huge difference.

I think you misunderstood...something I said. I didnt indicate, as you put it, that catastrophic coverage was much cheaper. So no idea how to respond to that.

If you dont get the leap, then check on NHS's website, or search google.co.uk for cases where NHS denied coverage due to having private insurance. I found many stories.

I also see you guys have have death panels :Q All in the name of saving a buck I guess.


Sentenced to death on the NHS
Patients with terminal illnesses are being made to die prematurely under an NHS scheme to help end their lives, leading doctors have warned.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |