Quite sad and pathetic that wikipedia can be controlled by bias rejects, Bigcat82 has been hounding the lion vs tiger moderation on wiki for years erasing anything pro-lion or in favor of the lions behalf:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BigCat82
The lion vs tiger wikipedia is so botched its beyound hilarious, its starting to look just like the Korean version:
http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hổ_đấu_với_sư_tử
Funny how they have to try so hard to promote the notion a tiger would win more times, yet their sources are half ass so badly, anyone who reads its original source will die laughing in how desperate they are, as John varty never said those words on his own site he even states a more agressive lion would win by genetics, the 1909 incident which was at Bostocks zoo the tiger never killed the lion, the tiger named Mogul had a chain around his neck preventing Prince the lion from killing him as the owner herr falkendorf and his team had to beat the lion off the tiger with cro bars, the rest of the experts have no obseravtion of them fighting in excerpt form, the other accounts baroda and oude is non-existant in indias records and even the weights are hilariously obscured, as a composite the tiger is the smaller animal, even at max in terms size the lion is taller and has a mane.
Yet...anyone who reads clyde beattys 3 books, and read a few news articles on him will no just from one man, more sources than Bigcat82's 100's of forums, youtube videos and blogs of fake photoshoped accounts of snip and cuts leaving out full details, Clyde beatty had lost 50+ tigers in his 40 year career as the guiness world record holder of working 40+ tigers/lions in a single cage at a time, and only 2 lions to tigers...thats more accounts than all of the web has to offer of tigers killing lions, doubled...just from one man, and theres like a 100 other sources of occaisons the lion trumped the tiger without even trying.
Sad really, dont know what would drive a guy to pump out that much bias. But oh wells, ya cant hide the truth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BigCat82
The lion vs tiger wikipedia is so botched its beyound hilarious, its starting to look just like the Korean version:
http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hổ_đấu_với_sư_tử
Funny how they have to try so hard to promote the notion a tiger would win more times, yet their sources are half ass so badly, anyone who reads its original source will die laughing in how desperate they are, as John varty never said those words on his own site he even states a more agressive lion would win by genetics, the 1909 incident which was at Bostocks zoo the tiger never killed the lion, the tiger named Mogul had a chain around his neck preventing Prince the lion from killing him as the owner herr falkendorf and his team had to beat the lion off the tiger with cro bars, the rest of the experts have no obseravtion of them fighting in excerpt form, the other accounts baroda and oude is non-existant in indias records and even the weights are hilariously obscured, as a composite the tiger is the smaller animal, even at max in terms size the lion is taller and has a mane.
Yet...anyone who reads clyde beattys 3 books, and read a few news articles on him will no just from one man, more sources than Bigcat82's 100's of forums, youtube videos and blogs of fake photoshoped accounts of snip and cuts leaving out full details, Clyde beatty had lost 50+ tigers in his 40 year career as the guiness world record holder of working 40+ tigers/lions in a single cage at a time, and only 2 lions to tigers...thats more accounts than all of the web has to offer of tigers killing lions, doubled...just from one man, and theres like a 100 other sources of occaisons the lion trumped the tiger without even trying.
Sad really, dont know what would drive a guy to pump out that much bias. But oh wells, ya cant hide the truth.