ProfJohn
Lifer
- Jul 28, 2006
- 18,161
- 7
- 0
Now you are attacking Palin's son!Originally posted by: Skoorb
What's the point, this is like special olympics, if you win you're still a retard.
Now you are attacking Palin's son!Originally posted by: Skoorb
What's the point, this is like special olympics, if you win you're still a retard.
That is a dumb ass statement when Obama wants to spend MORE than Bush.Originally posted by: Xavier434
That might be enough for you, but it is not anywhere near enough for many other people. That is why Obama will win and McCain will lose. No one wants the spend like Bush was spending anymore. They don't even want it to be 50% like Bush let alone 90%.Originally posted by: badnewcastle
As a Conservative, something people want you to be ashamed of (I'm not), I've never really liked McCain when you look at his votes. Yeah he did vote for 90% of the bills Bush signed, but the majority of those were spending/budget bills. When you look at the issues, the surge, immagration and education, McCain took sides against Bush.
Oh, poor baby, are you going to cry now? Calling me a moron for referring to McCain's ad as pitiful seems a bit out of scope, too. Since there are probably no retards (I didn't say handicaps, 'tard!) in this thread, I doubt any of them will end up reading what I wrote.Originally posted by: andy04
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Boooohooohooo cry a river moron. This is what real "Chicago style politics" is. its gonna get more down and dirty. deal with it stop complaining and start attacking.Originally posted by: andy04
thats a really sad statement for the handicaps... shame on you. :disgust:Originally posted by: Skoorb
What's the point, this is like special olympics, if you win you're still a retard
ya attack how much ever you want but why attach the handicaps, they are nowere in the discussion. that aspect is nowhere in picture. say whatever you want about me or repubs or whoever but what you said is was totally out of scope
I'm that kids babydaddy, so it's ok.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Now you are attacking Palin's son!Originally posted by: Skoorb
What's the point, this is like special olympics, if you win you're still a retard.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
That is a dumb ass statement when Obama wants to spend MORE than Bush.Originally posted by: Xavier434
That might be enough for you, but it is not anywhere near enough for many other people. That is why Obama will win and McCain will lose. No one wants the spend like Bush was spending anymore. They don't even want it to be 50% like Bush let alone 90%.Originally posted by: badnewcastle
As a Conservative, something people want you to be ashamed of (I'm not), I've never really liked McCain when you look at his votes. Yeah he did vote for 90% of the bills Bush signed, but the majority of those were spending/budget bills. When you look at the issues, the surge, immagration and education, McCain took sides against Bush.
[/thread]Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Watch the full context of the statement and it is self explanatory.
Or, just maybe, Foxnews is complete fvcking sh*t and they will report on any minutiae brainless tidbit, especially if it has an anti-democratic slantOriginally posted by: badnewcastle
Both sides of the OP's topic have made it to the front page of Fox News.com...
and not on CNN.com... maybe they are running from the subject???? MSNBC also has reported on it...
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
That is a dumb ass statement when Obama wants to spend MORE than Bush.Originally posted by: Xavier434
That might be enough for you, but it is not anywhere near enough for many other people. That is why Obama will win and McCain will lose. No one wants the spend like Bush was spending anymore. They don't even want it to be 50% like Bush let alone 90%.Originally posted by: badnewcastle
As a Conservative, something people want you to be ashamed of (I'm not), I've never really liked McCain when you look at his votes. Yeah he did vote for 90% of the bills Bush signed, but the majority of those were spending/budget bills. When you look at the issues, the surge, immagration and education, McCain took sides against Bush.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Or, just maybe, Foxnews is complete fvcking sh*t and they will report on any minutiae brainless tidbit, especially if it has an anti-democratic slantOriginally posted by: badnewcastle
Both sides of the OP's topic have made it to the front page of Fox News.com...
and not on CNN.com... maybe they are running from the subject???? MSNBC also has reported on it...
Originally posted by: jpeyton
[/thread]Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Watch the full context of the statement and it is self explanatory.
I'm surprised so many of you idiots are still debating about this.
Originally posted by: loki8481
this whole "lipstick on a pig" thing is retarded. I can't believe Obama's actually dignifying it with a response.
but it's hard for me to feel too bad for the guy when his people used the exact same tactics to frame Bill Clinton as a racist over equally innocuous statements.
Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
If Obama doesn't respond the charges stick. Remember what they did to Kerry?
Obama has to meet these ridiculous claims head on and nip them in the bud to keep on message. His job is actually fairly simple, just keep pointing out that McCain has no new policies and is just spewing nonsense to create diversions from the truth. He's doing a bang up job with that.
Originally posted by: jonks
For the record, the clip is out of context and since in the following line he talks about a fish getting wrapped up, I think they should have taken more offense at that line. I mean, how does Obama know whether or not Palin has good below the belt hygiene?
No it is not. Even the Obama supporters on here have admitted that fact.Originally posted by: Xavier434
More than Bush? That is complete garbage that even a large number of McCain supporters would disagree with.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
That is a dumb ass statement when Obama wants to spend MORE than Bush.Originally posted by: Xavier434
That might be enough for you, but it is not anywhere near enough for many other people. That is why Obama will win and McCain will lose. No one wants the spend like Bush was spending anymore. They don't even want it to be 50% like Bush let alone 90%.Originally posted by: badnewcastle
As a Conservative, something people want you to be ashamed of (I'm not), I've never really liked McCain when you look at his votes. Yeah he did vote for 90% of the bills Bush signed, but the majority of those were spending/budget bills. When you look at the issues, the surge, immagration and education, McCain took sides against Bush.
And that figure comes from Obama himself.The total price tag of Obama?s plans, according to his campaign, is $130 billion a year. On top of that, Obama is proposing a middle-class tax cut of about $80 billion a year.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
[/thread]Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Watch the full context of the statement and it is self explanatory.
I'm surprised so many of you idiots are still debating about this.
Originally posted by: badnewcastle
Both sides of the OP's topic have made it to the front page of Fox News.com...
and not on CNN.com... maybe they are running from the subject???? MSNBC also has reported on it...
Originally posted by: Druidx
I don't see it as that big of a deal, more of a stupid joke. The Dems acting like there wasn't any intent behind the phrase are either dishonest or plain dumb, just look at the crowd response. If the crowd got the inference, how is none of the Obama fans on P&N got it. I would agree McCain putting out an ad is just as silly.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
This gripe about "lipstick on a pig" is just as stupid as the "uppity" statement. Both are examples of each side jumping up and down and pointing fingers at the other.
One thing this election year has made clear is that is sure as hell wasn't Bush who was the divider. It's the staunch knuckleheads of each party who are widening that chasm.
Unless the Republicans consider Palin a pig I see no mention of her in that statement."John McCain says he's about change too, and so I guess his whole angle is, 'Watch out George Bush -- except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics -- we're really going to shake things up in Washington,'" he said.
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
This gripe about "lipstick on a pig" is just as stupid as the "uppity" statement. Both are examples of each side jumping up and down and pointing fingers at the other.
One thing this election year has made clear is that is sure as hell wasn't Bush who was the divider. It's the staunch knuckleheads of each party who are widening that chasm.
QFT