Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
LoL, says you. Says me: It's a cheap form of half cardio and you don't get big from it.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
Originally posted by: sygyzy
What does it matter how light someone's weights are? Because you are stronger than them? I don't see how your complaint has any validity.
No. Because 100 reps at 20 lbs, when they can obviously do more (they are not struggling to do this at all) seems kind of futile. Its just a minor annoyance, however. They aren't doing anything for their muscles doing this.
Actually, very high rep/low weight routines are good for specific muscular endurance.
Not everyone is trying to get big, or even build muscle mass. While I build for mass, I have to admit it's dickheads like you who make bodybuilders look bad. Luckily we don;t have people like you in my gym... or if we do, they keep their ignorant mouths shut.
And highrep workouts ARE used for specific muscular endurance, and as someone else pointed out, physical therapy. Highrep workouts are also good for people with arthritis.
Not everyone has the same goals as you or I do. It's time you grew up and realized that.
Struck a nerve, did I? Good. Maybe you'll learn something now, and stop spouting off wrong information...The primary goal, when ever touching a weight, is to build muscle, and to get stronger. Yes, you will get stronger by going high rep/low weight, but it's a highly inefficient and SLOW way to build strength You want endurance? That's a function of c-a-r-d-i-o.
No sht some people can't lift heavy, wtf doesn't know that? Thanks for educating me daddy, now can you tell me how to get to Sesame Street?
You obviously don't have the same goals as me if you follow the BS you just spouted out of your cornhole. Let me ask you, can someone who can max bench press 500 lbs do more reps then someone who can only max out 250lbs? BTW: Define muscular endurance. It'll be interesting to what information source you link to. Ignorant mouth shut? Please, I would embarrass you at the gym. Ask Melvin (RagingBitch) what I lift, "dickhead" (way to show your class, I bet you get ALL the ladies!).
EDIT: I'm off to the gym to deadlift. I'll check back to see your response later.
When one does cardio with their legs, they build MUSCULAR ENDURANCE. Ever try doing cardio with your arms, like rowing??? Why would someone ROW? Could it be to BUILD MUSCULAR ENDURANCE??? Sure, that's great for your biceps and back, but what if you want to build muscular endurance in other parts of your upper body?
Hint: You wont get muscular endurance from building size and strength. This explains why someone half your size could row all day long while you poop out after 20 minutes.
Now, besides specific muscular endurance, there is also therapeutic exercise to help with joint pain, most often because of injury or diseases like arthritis.
NONE of these goals is helped the least bit by low volume, high intensity weight training. They must be reached by HIGH volume, low intensity training.
The only person spouting here is you. You are ignorantly bleating the advise given to people who wish to train for strength and size. While I will agree that this happens to be the vast majority of people, there ARE cases in which high volume, low intensity weight training is beneficial. And that was my point from the beginning.
Do *I* follow high volume low intensity training? No, of course not. None of my goals would be reached by it. Would I suggest high volume low intensity training to someone who wants pain relief from arthritis? Of course. High intensity weight training will only aggravate their condition. The same with someone undergoing physical therapy for an injury.
Screw endurance. It's all about gettin BIG! When I fight you, I wanna be able to knock yo ass out in one punch.
just my two cents.