Little Ceasers Bacon wrapped deep dish pizza

[zinfamous]

lol, I don't care what those links say. I know how long it takes for me to not be hungry, and how long it takes for me to feel pressure on my stomach. If it takes you a fucking hour to eat a single small burrito, the only one doing it wrong here is you. That's like one bite every eight minutes.

EDIT: OK, I clicked the first link and it doesn't even really endorse your argument. Nice try, person-that-would-likely-be-a-fatty-without-someone-to-hold-his-hand.

honestly, I don't care what you believe. your belief doesn't matter, because I am not talking about belief.

denial is funny that way.

Anyway, who says that I take an hour to eat a burrito? I can't do that--can you? hell no. I eat the shit out of that--but I don't have the fucking AUDACITY to think that this will not fill me up in an hour. that I won't feel sick. that I would ever claim that this is not one stupid fucking way to be.

I don't excuse myself of that. I will eat that shit in minutes...but I won't turn around and blame the source of my food FOR NOT FULFILLING MY NEEDS INSTANTLY! ...because I'm not an idiot.

now, go learn to be served.

 

[zinfamous]

I can list 50 places in SD that have bigger less expensive burritos. .

Do it.

We need 50 places in SD with weight/cost > Chipotle

(someone quote me so that this asshat can read it.)

 

[waffleironhead]

Do it.

We need 50 places in SD with weight/cost > Chipotle

(someone quote me so that this asshat can read it.)

Id like to see it.

Waiting for 50 different taco bells to be listed.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

honestly, I don't care what you believe. your belief doesn't matter, because I am not talking about belief.

denial is funny that way.

Anyway, who says that I take an hour to eat a burrito? I can't do that--can you? hell no. I eat the shit out of that--but I don't have the fucking AUDACITY to think that this will not fill me up in an hour. that I won't feel sick. that I would ever claim that this is not one stupid fucking way to be.

I don't excuse myself of that. I will eat that shit in minutes...but I won't turn around and blame the source of my food FOR NOT FULFILLING MY NEEDS INSTANTLY! ...because I'm not an idiot.

now, go learn to be served.

Your links didn't even fit your claim, and many suggest 20 minutes which is exactly what I said is how long I take on a normal, non-hipster-taxed fast food meal. Now you're contradicting yourself when you say you would eat your burrito in minutes anyways, or you're just continuing to misrepresent my words in this thread. I never complained about it failing to fill me temporarily immediately after eating, I said that a few hours after one of their burritos I'll be hungry again, which is completely unrelated to this stomach reaction-time argument you're trying to pull out of your ass.

 

[zinfamous]

Your links didn't even fit your claim, and many suggest 20 minutes which is exactly what I said is how long I take on a normal, non-hipster-taxed fast food meal. Now you're contradicting yourself when you say you would eat your burrito in minutes anyways, or you're just continuing to misrepresent my words in this thread. I never complained about it failing to fill me temporarily immediately after eating, I said that a few hours after one of their burritos I'll be hungry again, which is completely unrelated to this stomach reaction-time argument you're trying to pull out of your ass.

I'm not contradicting myself.

Please show me where I first claimed how long it takes me to eat a burrito; where I first made a statement about my eating habits--where I ever claimed that I did not have the same bad habits that I mentioned.

Go.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

I'm not contradicting myself.

Please show me where I first claimed how long it takes me to eat a burrito; where I first made a statement about my eating habits--where I ever claimed that I did not have the same bad habits that I mentioned.

Go.

or you're just continuing to misrepresent my words in this thread

That one then.

 

[QueBert]

Id like to see it.

Waiting for 50 different taco bells to be listed.

Super Sergios, they have 3 locations
Cotijas, they have like 15 locations
Super Mex
Lolitas, both Bonita & Kerne Masa locations
Vaqueros Carne Asada
Santana
Sombreros
Tacos La Bufadores
Albertos
Rambertos
Robertos
El Robertos
Colimas
Lupes

Those are places off the top of my head I've eaten at, of course they don't use organically grown rice and beans. And the meat's probably from questionable sources for all of them, but pretty much every hole in the wall I've been to in San Diego gives you vastly more food for your dollar. Chipotle gives you FOUR OUNCES OF MEAT. Vaqueros Carne Asada's Cali Burrito has a pound, not even counting cheese and potatoes.

We could argue all night about "quality" but if you give someone a blind taste test of all the places I brought up + Chipotle, Chipotle won't win against any except maybe Super Sergios & Super Mex

This is not uncommon at Mexican spots in SD, quantity over quality for sure at a lot of them, but the taste is phenomenal at most.

 

[zinfamous]

That one then.

Super Sergios, they have 3 locations
Cotijas, they have like 15 locations
Super Mex
Lolitas, both Bonita & Kerne Masa locations
Vaqueros Carne Asada
Santana
Sombreros
Tacos La Bufadores
Albertos
Rambertos
Robertos
El Robertos
Colimas
Lupes

Those are places off the top of my head I've eaten at, of course they don't use organically grown rice and beans. And the meat's probably from questionable sources for all of them, but pretty much every hole in the wall I've been to in San Diego gives you vastly more food for your dollar. Chipotle gives you FOUR OUNCES OF MEAT. Vaqueros Carne Asada's Cali Burrito has a pound, not even counting cheese and potatoes.

We could argue all night about "quality" but if you give someone a blind taste test of all the places I brought up + Chipotle, Chipotle won't win against any except maybe Super Sergios.

lol at this guy with his locations.

2nd unfounded claim in post: seriously? let's see it. Let's make this blind taste test happen.

Your taste is nothing but suspect for everyone that reads your posts, so I'm curious about your perception of what other people think when it comes to flavor...because, well, you seem to be quantifiably wrong, every fucking time.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Are you really incapable of understanding the difference between the time it takes to register an "I'm full" signal, and the time it takes to be hungry again?

 

[zinfamous]

this is also the guy that claimed that rice needs tomato paste to taste good....tomato fucking paste.

real Italians--and I mean the depressed war refuge types that shit out tomato paste decades ago in order to make fake pasta sauce, won't even tolerate that shit now...because no one should eat that

It's never needed to make anything properly.

remember that, folks.

lol at rice needs tomato paste "to be palatable." might as well douse it with ketchup. LEARN TO COOK.

 

[zinfamous]

Are you really incapable of understanding the difference between the time it takes to register an "I'm full" signal, and the time it takes to be hungry again?

you interrupted my rant at Quebert. I will address your complaint later, sir.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

this is also the guy that claimed that rice needs tomato paste to taste good....tomato fucking paste.

real Italians--and I mean the depressed war refuge types that shit out tomato paste decades ago in order to make fake pasta sauce, won't even tolerate that shit now...because no one should eat that

It's never needed to make anything properly.

remember that, folks.

lol at rice needs tomato paste "to be palatable." might as well douse it with ketchup. LEARN TO COOK.

And you're the guy that insists KFC isn't fried chicken, or something along those lines. Enjoy pretending that loving Chipotle makes you a member of the patrician class.

 

[Childs]

Do it.

We need 50 places in SD with weight/cost > Chipotle

(someone quote me so that this asshat can read it.)

I dont think it would be hard. I could probably list 10 places in Sunnyvale on or close to El Camino, just between Lawrence and Hwy 85. I think there are probably more Mexicans in SD since its closer to Mexico, and probably more decent hole in the wall Mexican restaurants. Super burritos at most Mexican places are like $6. Getting guac on a Chipotle burrito would push it close to $8. Mexican places tend to put in more meat, and you never know with Chipotle. Sometimes they are on the small side or mostly rice and beans, and other times its so big the person needs two tortillas to wrap it. I think its fair to say Chipotle is inconsistent. Maybe not in quality, but definitely quantity.

Since were off topic, when I get a burrito I always go for a shrimp burrito if available. Thats some good stuff. Theres a place in San Jose that does any kind of seafood burrito. Shrimp, scallops, fish, squid, you name it. Even shrimp nachos! Man I miss carbs. The only reason I go to Chipotle is because they offer a salad I can customize. Otherwise, there are a million real Mexican places I'd rather go to. And no, I'm not going to list them. :biggrin:

 

[QueBert]

And for reference that last picture I posted, the burrito has Shrimp, Carne Asada, Cheese & Pico in it. No rice, no beans no filler. It's $10.50.

 

[CZroe]

LOL! Here's a post from BurgieBoi's own thread where he admits that he was only able to snack for the rest of the day (bagels and protein bar)!

Seriously. I ate what I thought was a considerable amount today (two bagels + cream cheese = ~700 calories, protein bar = ~250 calories, soda = ~300 calories, and Chipotle burrito = ~700 calories) but that still only touched the supposed normal 2000. Granted, I don't exercise so I won't judge athletes and construction workers and other physically active individuals, but HTF do others manage to eat so much? Do you people live on candy and frappuccinos and shit? Not that I'm saying more than 2000 is necessarily a lot either, but I am seriously confused as to how a physically inactive individual manages to eat 3000/4000+ calories every day.

EDIT: Title changed from "How do people get fat?".

Oh man! You sure were hungry! Look at how you had to compensate with those two larger meals! You even call this a "considerable amount" in reference to daily intake!

After his posts in this thread I immediately recalled where he described his In-n-Out order to us. Here it is:

I wait until I finish my meal (in this case, three hamburers with only mustard and spread, plus a side of fries), and then drink water in the privacy of my own car. Am I abusing the system without realizing it?

It wasn't easy to find because he has DOZENS of In-n-Out threads here (he even says as much in one of them).

Now, let those two threads sink in and ask yourself why anyone would take portion size opinions from this guy.

Nice assumptions bro. I never stated the number of meals I eat in a day, that all of my meals are of equivalent caloric content, or anything else you've implied. All I said is that Chipotle offers a lot less food than other fast food places at the same price point. If I'm eating fast food, it means I'm on campus and want something quick, filling, and relatively inexpensive. I can order a 3-entree plate from Panda Express and be completely stuffed for the rest of the day. I can order two double-meats and a side of fries and be almost as full, and certainly not need to eat for another several hours. If pizza wasn't usually too messy to deal with in public, I could order a large pepperoni, be packed and have enough left over for breakfast the next morning. I order a Chipotle burrito, and with a sort of lukewarm stomach status, certainly not full and within a few hours I will be hungry again.

"Two double-meats?!"

I can list 50 places in SD that have bigger less expensive burritos. Hell where I work they have a Pura Carne burrito which has around 12oz of meat. That's 3 Chipotle burritos worth of meat. Chipotle makes large FILLER burritos. Which is great if you want to eat rice and beans. But, a bean rice and cheese burrito from any place I go to will be much bigger and much cheaper, and Chipotle only puts 4oz of meat in a burrito. The burrito I had last Friday had more meat in it alone then everything in a Chipotle burrito combine.

that's a California Burrito from a place I use to frequent It weighs probably 2 1/2 pounds and cost $8. It's about the size of my forearm - not exaggerating much, if any.

California burritos have French fries in them. OMG! Potatoes! That's "filler." D:

And for reference that last picture I posted, the burrito has Shrimp, Carne Asada, Cheese & Pico in it. No rice, no beans no filler. It's $10.50.

That was never supposed to be eaten in one sitting by one person. Also, $10.50 is not cheap.

No one ever implied that you get more for your money at Chipotle. That's like implying that you get more for your money at Whole Foods vs a normal grocery chain. Reasonable people understand that you might have to pay more for higher quality ingredients. Obviously, we are willing.

 

[QueBert]

California burritos have French fries in them. OMG! Potatoes! That's "filler." D:


That was never supposed to be eaten in one sitting by one person. Also, $10.50 is not cheap.

No one ever implied that you get more for your money at Chipotle. That's like implying that you get more for your money at Whole Foods vs a normal grocery chain. Reasonable people understand that you might have to pay more for higher quality ingredients. Obviously, we are willing.

I'll explain filler, order Chipotle with only meat, you will be pissed at how small it is and left hungry. Order the Cali Burrito I eat without potatoes, you still won't be able to finish it. Chipotle you NEED all that shit to make it more than a snack. That, is filler.


As for $10.50 not being cheap, it has about 8x as much meat as Chipotle, 2 pounds of meat + cheese in a Burrito for $10.50 is stupidly cheap. That's about what a burrito with 8oz of meat at Chipotle costs no? 4x the meat for the same price seems mighty cheap. Or, Chipotle is just that over-priced. Take your pick *shrug*

As for the higher quality ingredient, again in a blind taste test 90/100 people wouldn't pick Chipotle compared to any spot I eat at. Better ingredients don't mean shit when the food's bland as hell. I think a lot of people eat there because they equate the quality with it having to taste better, but it simply doesn't. It's a placebo effect or something because it fails flavor wise.

 

[CZroe]

I think it's telling that you only consider proportions in relation to meat content even though one of the most common burritos, bean and cheese, has no meat. Chipotle recently introduced Sofritas, which is served in place of meat. Where did you get the idea that all burritos are supposed to be tubes of meat just because some are?!

I never get beans and always add fajita veggies instead. You can order no rice, no beans, and add all the veggies and salsa and cheese you want and get similar proportions if you are willing to pay for double meat. The "filler" is not required.

You very clearly only value meat in your value comparison. Something tells me that your idea of "bland" is "not a mouthful of meat with a hint of tortilla in every bite," completely ignoring that other types of burritos exist. A bean and cheese burrito is not a carne asada burrito. A Chipotle chicken and rice burrito is not a carne asada burrito. A Taco Bell Fiesta chicken burrito (also has rice) is not a carne asada burrito. A Taco Bell Chili Cheese Burrito is not a carne asada burrito. You are comparing apples to oranges and assuming everyone wants apples.

90% of people would say that cake taste better than plain rye bread. Giving them a tube of meat is almost as rich. Expecting all burritos to be a tube of meat is like expecting all bread to be cake.

 

[eits]

"Embarassment"? You'd be smart to get over the manly display of your eating prowess before it's too late.

Not many people who eat 1000 calorie meals and chow them down in 5 minutes are either watching the calorie intake, nor staying within their daily caloric needs very often. It's exactly why 2/3 of adults in the US are overweight and 35% are obese. "Oh, it's just one 1000 calorie burrito. Hardly even fills me up."

Enjoy it while you can, if gorging on cheap food is what you 'enjoy'. I can easily see your 130 becoming 180 in the not too distant future. Four or five pounds per year. You, too, can weight 220 lbs by the time you're 45. Yeah, "I have a high metabolism", "my dad and grampa are skinny", "I weigh the same as I did in high school", blah, blah, blah ... doesn't matter. It will catch up to you.

lol, i thought the same thing. wtf kinda dumbass shit is that?

 

[Slick5150]

I clicked thinking I'd see people talking about this pizza.

Instead all I see is talk of burritos and calling each other fat.

Seems legit.

 

[Ichinisan]

I clicked thinking I'd see people talking about this pizza.

Instead all I see is talk of burritos and calling each other fat.

Seems legit.

QueBert food threads always turn to Chipotle. I'm probably the reason that many of them do. :hmm:

 

[CZroe]

I clicked thinking I'd see people talking about this pizza.

Instead all I see is talk of burritos and calling each other fat.

Seems legit.

...and we will see to it that any and all QueBert food threads go there.

 

[norseamd]

And on somehow probably a far more relevant note how is 40 miles Southwest of Atlanta put Newnan in Metropolitan Atlanta?

 

[CZroe]

And on somehow probably a far more relevant note how is 40 miles Southwest of Atlanta put Newnan in Metropolitan Atlanta?

Who brought that up? Anyway, the Atlanta GMA (Greater Metropolitan Area) is huge. Look it up. Union City is 12 minutes from Newnan and they frequently use "Atlanta" in their mailing address. Everyone considers I-285 "The Perimeter" of Atlanta, which is why it's called "The Perimeter" more than it is called by its proper name. The Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport (ATL), which is on that perimeter, is only a few minutes further (technically, ATL is College Park; not Atlanta). Newnan is as much Atlanta's "South Side" as Morrow, Jonesboro, and McDonough.

 

[norseamd]

Jesus Fuckballs. After reading the discription my first point of contention is gone in that the purple is actually the St. Cloud Metropolitan Area. However this still seems too big as I doubt most would consider Mille Lacs as existing in the Metropolitan Area. Might agree with the 2 Wisconsin counties being considered as being part of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area however.

 

[norseamd]

Who brought that up?

Me. Just suggesting it is probably more on topic than the QueBert discussion.