Whats the tdp for the dual core and does it have the same gpu?
The Two core unit I believe has half the SP units as well. Same architecture just less of it.
Whats the tdp for the dual core and does it have the same gpu?
BD or bust; no other AMD product is exciting for what I am looking for right now on the CPU side.
It's a nice choice to have. It's like choosing between a beautiful high-maintenance girlfriend and a beautiful low-maintenance girlfriend.
definitely interested in a quad itx setup here
I'd like to have one as a replacement for my matx c2d server
if I can do this well under 100watts full load will be the determining factor
I just want it small and low power draw
might build an ITX setup around it. Low price, low power consumption and adquate performance are a must.
Whats the tdp for the dual core and does it have the same gpu?
I'm interested in a LLano desktop miniITX rig, to replace my current Q9300 desktops. But I want a low-power LLano, like 35-45W.
Unless you are paying over 50 cents per Kw/h you will never make up the purchase price of the A8 by saving on your electric bills.
Your Q9300 @ 3 Ghz is going to be faster then the A8. Using Cinebench Single-threaded the A8 produces 2050 while the Q9300 (@3Ghz) produces a score of 3300. In the multi-threaded benchmark the A8 produces almost 7000 compared to the Q9300 at over 12000. Today's A8 processor just can't keep up with Intel's 2008 budget quad-core.
Just buy yourself an AMD HD 6850 if you are itching to upgrade.
A8 processors will make a difference in laptops. It is a better GPU then what is in 90% of current laptops.
Your Q9300 @ 3 Ghz is going to be faster then the A8. Using Cinebench Single-threaded the A8 produces 2050 while the Q9300 (@3Ghz) produces a score of 3300. In the multi-threaded benchmark the A8 produces almost 7000 compared to the Q9300 at over 12000. Today's A8 processor just can't keep up with Intel's 2008 budget quad-core on the desktop.