Sorry and apologies, I forgot to mention I don't exactly believe everything equipment manufacturers, or anybody for that matter, tries to tell me. I like to confirm things from at least 2 independant sources. Everything. I always interpret a reluctance to divulge information as avoidance and subterfuge, and unltimately as misinformation.
1st sentence and also the 3rd paragraph
" What are the advantages of using aluminium on the nose cones of the Logitech z-560, and whatever other models they make with them, speaker systems? Is it just for looks. [ Right now I make a mental tracking note, ' how far does this manufacturer go to in sacrificing function for esthetics? ' (Then the 2nd mental note starts up,... is the perceived "enhancement" (esthetics) a greater benefit to my experience than the functioning would have been if they used the correct/optimum/cost effective substance to make the cone?)]. Is aluminium a good metal to use for speakers? Sorry 'anodized' aluminium (just a chemical coat to keep it shiney that is a better marketing word than 'polished').
Doesn't everyone think like this? They should. They should be assimilated.
2nd sentence and rest of paragraph
The "new" Logitech z-680 speaker system has decoding. I use a PC sound card to my z560's with the center/sub channel split up to a different set of speakers. Why would I want/need decoding from the speakers? Would the input source to the z680's be carrying all the signal that can be separated to the speakers and that would ultimately provide a THX certifiable Dolbt Digital or DTS experience. In my mind, unless you had a source that was DTS, DD specific there's not going to be the full correct signal provided on the channel so where would the Z680'2 get the info to make it 5.1 DD / DTS. If you did, then there'd be no use for hardware decoding.
2nd paragraph
Everything produces electromagnetic radiation, well almost, least most of the things we want to concern ourselves with. Manufacturers sometimes provide information indicating that their speakers (with a magnetic cores and electric components) are 'sheilded'. This means that there is supposed to be a 'barrier' between the speaker and other components so they don't interfere with each other. Usually the speakers effecting displays, board components, etc. This shielding is made with 'MU' metal and is a percentage iron, nickle, etc. Does anyone know if there is a certification process and how is this enforced. I ask this because I had issues with this before and of course none of the manufacturers want to answer these questions. I know everybody knows all this already so that's why they never put any of this information on the web voluntarily unless it means 'clever' marketing to them.
Gold reference is to the debate that goes on between 'our' experts over which cables are best, the ones that use gold connectors? Some will convince you it makes an easily measureable diffenence in the listening experience, and other's put it down. I can't notice a difference, aplogies to the purists.
Looks like most people just swallow whatever they are fed, and if the forums and communities aren't being monitored by business you're probably one of the people that likes wearing clothes that have names and logos all over them to 'express' yourself.
I am so away, very different, but doesn't mean I'm wrong, (whether I have a tail and hooves) It'd be very interesting to see support from the consumer (forum community) rather than statements of defense for the businesses. Instead of sniping at me, what would happen if you opened your mind a little and gave these thoughts credence.
I know you'd all rather talk about YOU have to down load the latest driver, this feature isn't supported for this version and model of that, and much the same. Filling in for an industry that obviously isn't doing it. Guess I'd defend them too if they made me feel productive and needed.
Cheers,
Ricardo