Why don't gay scouts start their own scouting organization that lacks such criteria?
Looks like they are willing to compromise, potentially.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/28/us/boy-scouts-policy/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Get with the changing times, or else!
Reduced funding is the "or else".
Why don't people just leave the organization? It's better served for a homosexual person to go elsewhere instead of trying to force people to "change with the times" which is really what this is all about.
No telling, one day they could get enough power to force Churches (other private organizations) to change their principles.
Many have left the organization. Many others refuse to join because of their stupid position on this. That has an impact on funding, which is part of why I said reduced funding is the "or else".
Only by doing what consumers should do more: vote with their wallets.
Well so be it. They fall, they fall. Chances are that changing the rules won't necessarily change members' attitudes. That's the important part, IMO.
I don't see why homosexuals would want to be anywhere near a place that doesn't want them. You can't force people to accept things. This has never worked! If anything, its being done under false pretenses -- to keep funding, not because they accept homosexuality.
Well so be it. They fall, they fall. Chances are that changing the rules won't necessarily change members' attitudes. That's the important part, IMO.
I don't see why homosexuals would want to be anywhere near a place that doesn't want them. You change to meet the requirements of said organization, not them for you, in this instance. You can't force people to accept things. This has never worked! If anything, its being done under false pretenses -- to keep funding, not because they accept homosexuality.
You can have a gay club, but not a non-gay club. That is RACIST! errr homosexual-ist? Either way, one is right but not the other, wether it's the race card or the gay card, it's complete emphasis on how pathetic both groups are - and a further confirmation as to why both are looked down upon.
I look down on a group of people that are so mindlessly pathetic that they want to get into a group just becaue they said they aren't allowed.
Except in this case, it is dull, mindless, pathetic, and useless Americans with no life of their own.
You assume that Boy Scout members have as much of a problem with homosexuality as the organization's leadership. That's not a good assumption to make.
Perhaps you're right. But of they're still part of the organization, they obviously agree with what's going there, or either I'm totally misinterpreting it.
It's better served for a homosexual person to go elsewhere instead of trying to force people to "change with the times" which is really what this is all about.
I don't see why homosexuals would want to be anywhere near a place that doesn't want them. You change to meet the requirements of said organization, not them for you, in this instance. You can't force people to accept things. This has never worked! If anything, its being done under false pretenses -- to keep funding, not because they accept homosexuality.
KJ is NOT the original version of the bible. Hell, its not even the fiftieth version.What part of this don't you understand? They're already compromising by not killing gays.
- KJV: (King James Version): "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them."