OutHouse is a sack of garbage.
You must learn to phrase your outrage better. Just look at how several other posters responded for guidance.
Perknose
Forum Director
A Tineye reverse search quickly showed this is an image of ISIS sympathizers, back some year(s) ago, having NOTHING to do with the current wave of refugees.
Also...your comment is entirely stupid and out of line.
PS: If you turn on about 5 brain cells and look at the image, do those guys look like fricking REFUGEES?
They could always try to emigrate to Russia. I'm sure Putin would be happy to have them. Or better yet, Ethiopia or Somalia, or Saudi Arabia, or . . . .
Outhouse: Where did you get that photo? Were you duped by some ultra right wing "news" site?
Far more common scenes in Germany
and you know this how?
Like the media and Germany would let anything ugly show up in public.
and you know this how?
Like the media and Germany would let anything ugly show up in public.
As I said in another thread, too much people = cracking down. Not just Germany but the neighbors are cracking down too.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germany-to-impose-border-controls/ar-AAeeSFQ?li=AAa0dzB
and you know this how?
Like the media and Germany would let anything ugly show up in public.
Outhouse: Where did you get that photo? Were you duped by some ultra right wing "news" site?
and you know this how?
Like the media and Germany would let anything ugly show up in public.
How about places like the USA stop destroying/destabilizing the nations these refugees are trying to escape from?
Instead try actual nation building instead of trying to merely stake claim to such an idea while in reality doing the opposite.
I suspect he knew what he was doing. Here's the site he apparently got it from:
http://conservativepost.com/
It IS possible to deport illegal immigrants you know. Just because they got past border control (no big deal anywhere if you're determined enough) doesn't mean that you have to go 'oh well, they're already, nothing we can do.'"Closing borders" is not an option since (IMHO) the folks will try/want to get in anyway...having 10,000s of them outside, waiting, starving, dieing etc. is obviously not an alternative.
What EU countries must do is find ways to distribute the folks evenly so as not to create burdens on ONE country while other countries don't even take them and then of course proper integration programs.
THEY ARE HERE now, you can't change this fact and even more will come...so whether people like it or not...Europe will have to deal with this.
It IS possible to deport illegal immigrants you know. Just because they got past border control (no big deal anywhere if you're determined enough) doesn't mean that you have to go 'oh well, they're already, nothing we can do.'
If a country is really serious about staunching illegal immigration, it can be done and in cases where you have so many immigrants it threatens to destabilize your economy, it SHOULD be done.
The problem is that very few countries, the US included, are really serious about it. But get back to us in a few years when you find out that a lot of these people aren't interested in assimilating and are becoming a drain on state resources. If you're really willing to pay even higher taxes and deal with all of the other problems that will be created, that's great. But I guarantee most of your neighbors aren't going to agree.
They were refugees when your govt was permitting them entry. But unless you haven't watched the news, you know that this is no longer the case. Your govt finally realized what a disaster it would be to continue that policy and reversed it - in record time I might add.Wait a minute!
You cannot mix refugees and "illegal immigrants" into one pot.
A refugee who applies for asylum, based on VALID GROUNDS is a big difference to someone who migrates to another country illegally for "economic reasons".
You cannot have a policy where a "rightful" refugee from a warn-torn area like Syria can be granted asylum..and then talk about deporting or denying those people the right to apply for asylum. On what grounds would that denial happen?
I really want to underline that the "issue" of illegals coming into the US and refugees getting into Europe are two different shoes.
>>
a lot of these people aren't interested in assimilating a
>>
Possible. Possibly not. What else but speculating can we do?
All I know is that I lived in Berlin for ten years and there are some districts with a very high percentage of Muslims, Turks etc. I personally didn't have any problems and many of the folks there are well integrated into the culture. This, on the other hand was BEFORE 9/11 and the entire ISIS and extremists bull-shit.
but it's NOT the responsibility of the rest of the world to take them in, support them, and give them new lives.
No. They don't have the right to pick any country they want and demand that they be admitted. That's bullshit.It's not? It's not our responsibility to take-on refugees, say, if folks are coming from a region where their death or family member's death is a likelihood every single day?
So, they do not have the right to flee this area? They do not have the right to be afraid of being killed....and they don't have the right to think that they don't want to engage in whatever pointless fights...and chose going to a sane place instead without daily war and death?
The problem is that all of these refugees WANT to go to Germany although most are probably willing to settle for Austria. And the reason is the generous aid and benefits the German govt gives. This is a calculated choice. It's a little like you're starving to death but won't settle for anything less than surf and turf. Give me lobster or give me death.I'm not a human rights expert but I believe that the UN refugee agreement applies to the first Country they enter its not a shopping or comparison program.
I'm not from Germany either but they have obviously been very generous accepting displaced Syrian's. Nobody but a German should decide if its possible to accept more in Germany.