From what I understand GPU's get more "points" folding, but the type of calculations they do are limited compared to what CPU's can do. Being mainly concerned with helping out the medical science, I'm wondering if it would be more beneficial to focus on building a CPU intensive system rather than a GPU one?
I've figured (using some spare parts I have lying around) that it would cost roughly the same $1,000 to build a pair of overclocked I7 machines with low-end graphics cards churning out CPU-based WU's, or a pair of cheap E5200 Core 2 Duo systems with GTX 560+ cards churning out GPU-based WU's. Obviously the 560's would churn out more points, but would both options be relatively equivalent in terms of scientific value? Or do the greater points given by GPU's really indicate a greater amount of "help" being given to the project?
Finally, if you had $1k to improve your current folding setup, what type of machine(s) would you build?
I've figured (using some spare parts I have lying around) that it would cost roughly the same $1,000 to build a pair of overclocked I7 machines with low-end graphics cards churning out CPU-based WU's, or a pair of cheap E5200 Core 2 Duo systems with GTX 560+ cards churning out GPU-based WU's. Obviously the 560's would churn out more points, but would both options be relatively equivalent in terms of scientific value? Or do the greater points given by GPU's really indicate a greater amount of "help" being given to the project?
Finally, if you had $1k to improve your current folding setup, what type of machine(s) would you build?
Last edited: