Oh yea, that UPLOAD....so apparently the down loaders are not a problem there, it is the up loaders?
Text
Text
After I broke the news that both Time Warner Cable and Comcast were considering monthly caps and overage fees, I noticed that a refraining industry talking point justifying the move usually went something like this: "Well, despite being hailed as a FTTH utopia, Japan is implementing caps too." The argument being that low caps and overage fees were inevitable even in the face of serious capacity upgrades and the latest throttling technologies.
Well, fiber carrier NTT Communications, which offers users symmetrical 100Mbps connections and VoIP for about $42 per month, today unveiled those long ballyhooed cap plans: a daily upload limit of 30 GB per day (930 GB per month), and unlimited downloads. No overage fees. Of course NTT's statement justifying the move sounds familiar:
A small number of individual users have been monopolizing substantial network resources by uploading massive amounts of data, which can slow the speed of the network and lower communication quality for other users
Damn those pesky users who consume more than 930GB worth of upstream bandwidth per month! Compare that to Time Warner Cable's proposed caps of between 5 and 40GB per month, and overage fees at a markup over cost of between 1000 and 1,500%. Apparently actually investing in capacity does make a difference after all. Did I mention FiOS, so far, has no caps? Did I mention French FTTH carriers don't either?
As an aside, while perusing the Intertubes, I came across this post on the cable industry's new blog that lets you know that Japanese broadband "isn't the beacon of broadband they were held out to be." I was fairly amused to find anyone in the American broadband industry attacking Japanese FTTH providers for offering 100Mbps speeds that fall below the advertised rate.