Malaysian airlines has lost a 777

Page 31 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zee

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 1999
5,171
3
76
If it had electrical problems, the ACARS & transponder would probably be the first things to go. Then, realizing there was a fire, the pilots made a beeline for the nearest airport & autopilot handled it from there. I think it would also explain why nobody called - they were all passed out from smoke inhalation. And why Rolls Royce continued to get data, why Thailand intermittently got data, and the satellite got ACARS data 30 minutes before the fuel ran out.

Give the update today that the search area is currently the size of the entire continental United States, yeah, we'll probably never find it. Bummer.

how does that explain the ok good night sign off after the transponders were already going off? It would be "oh fuck, smoke" instead of "good night"
 

yuchai

Senior member
Aug 24, 2004
980
2
76
If it had electrical problems, the ACARS & transponder would probably be the first things to go. Then, realizing there was a fire, the pilots made a beeline for the nearest airport & autopilot handled it from there. I think it would also explain why nobody called - they were all passed out from smoke inhalation. And why Rolls Royce continued to get data, why Thailand intermittently got data, and the satellite got ACARS data 30 minutes before the fuel ran out.

Give the update today that the search area is currently the size of the entire continental United States, yeah, we'll probably never find it. Bummer.

Not an expert, so just more questions for me.

What are the chances that an electrical fire causes complete communication blackout, but that the airplane itself flies perfectly fine with autopilot for a few hours until fuel runs out?

Heck, if the pilots detect an emergency, wouldn't they have tried a last ditch attempt at landing before being completely incapacitated? I know things can all happen very quickly, but you'd think at least they would have disengaged the autopilot and tried something?
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,523
5,343
136
how does that explain the ok good night sign off after the transponders were already going off? It would be "oh crap, smoke" instead of "good night"

As mentioned in a couple articles, it's possible that the systems were starting to fail before they noticed them, i.e. a fire started & began messing with stuff and then smoke made it's way up to the cabin or wherever. Not like an instantaneous thing.

My next thought would be that the oxygen masks would deploy, but apparently those only last for about 15 minutes or so:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_oxygen_system

So unless you're willing to pop off the emergency hatch & jump from 40,000 feet or however high they were, it's likely they all passed out from smoke inhalation.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,523
5,343
136
Not an expert, so just more questions for me.

What are the chances that an electrical fire causes complete communication blackout, but that the airplane itself flies perfectly fine with autopilot for a few hours until fuel runs out?

Heck, if the pilots detect an emergency, wouldn't they have tried a last ditch attempt at landing before being completely incapacitated? I know things can all happen very quickly, but you'd think at least they would have disengaged the autopilot and tried something?

I dunno, in a panic situation who knows. The engines were apparently still communicating with Rolls Royce for 5 hours after takeoff, so maybe it was isolated. Too many variables to know for sure without having solid information on how the systems worked. But Thailand said they got an intermittent signal for awhile, and the last ACARS communication at 8:11am was "faint".
 

TangoJuliet

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2006
5,595
1
76
My next thought would be that the oxygen masks would deploy, but apparently those only last for about 15 minutes or so:

I don't think those will drop in the event of a fire. You really don't want to mix oxygen with fire

edit: yup, last paragraph of that wiki

wiki said:
If there is a fire on board the aircraft, masks are not deployed, as the production of oxygen may further fuel the fire.
 
Last edited:

TangoJuliet

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2006
5,595
1
76
Not an expert, so just more questions for me.

What are the chances that an electrical fire causes complete communication blackout, but that the airplane itself flies perfectly fine with autopilot for a few hours until fuel runs out?

Heck, if the pilots detect an emergency, wouldn't they have tried a last ditch attempt at landing before being completely incapacitated? I know things can all happen very quickly, but you'd think at least they would have disengaged the autopilot and tried something?

Its very possible that a small electrical fire started and knocked out electronics slowly. It could have produced enough smoke to incapacitate everyone on board. I'm not sure if a small uncontrolled fire would/could go out over time and not damage the aircraft.

Lets assume that is what happened - the pilots lost comms and navs. They were flying blind to Phuket where eventually the smoke inhalation took them out. The plane would just continue to fly on with whatever the last inputs were made. I don't think the plane would fly level - it would probably just oscillate until it crashed.

That also doesn't explain why it made that northwest turn towards the andaman islands. If nobody was at the controls some how it managed to make that turn then it would have continued northwest through India
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
What I find interesting is that outside of US borders regions and Europe, this is the most radar/sat covered area of the globe and yet so little known about the location and flight of a large civilian air liner.

Have they mentioned any data on how much fule it had at launch and the corresponding distance it could make on the various projected travel arcs?
 

TangoJuliet

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2006
5,595
1
76
What I find interesting is that outside of US borders regions and Europe, this is the most radar/sat covered area of the globe and yet so little known about the location and flight of a large civilian air liner.

Have they mentioned any data on how much fule it had at launch and the corresponding distance it could make on the various projected travel arcs?

There is no radar coverage in the deep oceans. In fact there is no radar coverage in the Gulf of Mexico - despite what people may think. When ADS-B comes online fully ATC will switch from traditional RADAR to satellite based equipment
 

chowderhead

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 1999
2,633
263
126
Its very possible that a small electrical fire started and knocked out electronics slowly. It could have produced enough smoke to incapacitate everyone on board. I'm not sure if a small uncontrolled fire would/could go out over time and not damage the aircraft.

Lets assume that is what happened - the pilots lost comms and navs. They were flying blind to Phuket where eventually the smoke inhalation took them out. The plane would just continue to fly on with whatever the last inputs were made. I don't think the plane would fly level - it would probably just oscillate until it crashed.

That also doesn't explain why it made that northwest turn towards the andaman islands. If nobody was at the controls some how it managed to make that turn then it would have continued northwest through India

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-flight.html?_r=0
this negates the possibility of an onboard fire or electrical event.

The first turn to the west that diverted the missing Malaysia Airlines plane from its planned flight path from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing was carried out through a computer system that was most likely programmed by someone in the plane’s cockpit who was knowledgeable about airplane systems, according to senior American officials.

Flight 370’s Flight Management System reported its status to the Acars, which in turn transmitted information back to a maintenance base, according to an American official. This shows that the reprogramming happened before the Acars stopped working.

somebody programed the plane to turn around before ACARS stopped working and ACARS transmitted that information. In the event of smoke in the cockpit or a fire and communication systems failing, would the pilot type in commands into the console to make the left turn or would he manually divert? This throws out the sudden, catastrophic event which knocks out communications and eventually renders the pilots unable to fly the plan. It was a deliberate act to divert.
 

z1ggy

Lifer
May 17, 2008
10,004
63
91
^^ I'm sure it's possible to type in a command and have it execute at a given time or place and not instantly. Until that is determined you can't totally count out an electrical fire, or some kind of mechanical failure that manifested slowly over time.

However, given the evidence so far based on reports, I don't think it was an electrical fire. It just doesn't seem a likely cause for the effects of what have been observed.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,418
454
126
http://news.yahoo.com/thailand-gives-radar-data-10-days-plane-lost-124915659.html

Thailand's military said Tuesday that its radar detected a plane that may have been Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 just minutes after the jetliner's communications went down, and that it didn't share the information with Malaysia earlier because it wasn't specifically asked for it.

Thai Air Force withheld info that actually found a target on the radar heading west the night of the disappearance...lol what a Fail Force or as I said earlier a coverup
 

TangoJuliet

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2006
5,595
1
76
this negates the possibility of an onboard fire or electrical event.

why would it? its quite possible that they lost comms first, then lost the transponder and then the ACARS system.

If you go with Kaido's timeline

12:41am: Takeoff
1:07am: ACARS reports
1:19am: Co-pilot says "Good night" to ATC
1:20am: Transponder turns off
1:37am: No ACARS report

The ACARS could have gone offline anywhere from 1:07 to 1:37. I haven't heard anything definitive that said they knew for sure what time it went out.

1:19 last transmission with ATC, minute later transponder turns off, pilots notice smoke/fire and make the decision to turn. New route is inputted into the FMS and then the ACARS goes offline.

The key would be is if that route was programmed into the FMS prior to that 1:07 report. If it was then there is a high probability that the flight deck was compromised because the pilots would have said something to ATC at 1:19 rather then just goodnight
 

chowderhead

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 1999
2,633
263
126
why would it? its quite possible that they lost comms first, then lost the transponder and then the ACARS system.

If you go with Kaido's timeline



The ACARS could have gone offline anywhere from 1:07 to 1:37. I haven't heard anything definitive that said they knew for sure what time it went out.

1:19 last transmission with ATC, minute later transponder turns off, pilots notice smoke/fire and make the decision to turn. New route is inputted into the FMS and then the ACARS goes offline.

The key would be is if that route was programmed into the FMS prior to that 1:07 report. If it was then there is a high probability that the flight deck was compromised because the pilots would have said something to ATC at 1:19 rather then just goodnight

Even if you assume there was a cockpit failure, ACARS would have had to gone dead after 1:19 because someone programed into the console a LEFT turn and ACARS transmitted that information before ACARS went dead. Wouldn't the copilot had reported that an incident of needing to turn back if it happened before 1:19? If it happened after 1:19, why would you type in something instead of manually diverting in a catastrophic event?
 

yuchai

Senior member
Aug 24, 2004
980
2
76
Even if you assume there was a cockpit failure, ACARS would have had to gone dead after 1:19 because someone programed into the console a LEFT turn and ACARS transmitted that information before ACARS went dead. Wouldn't the copilot had reported that an incident of needing to turn back if it happened before 1:19? If it happened after 1:19, why would you type in something instead of manually diverting in a catastrophic event?

The article seems to indicate that the programming occurred before 1:07, because it goes on to say that they know about it from an ACARS transmission. I have to assume that they're referring to the 1:07 transmission, as the 1:37 one was scheduled but never occurred.

So, assuming all of this is true, you can't reconcile that with the "all right, good night" at 1:19 in the absence of foul play.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Here is an interesting scenario: When the plane levels off and is in "cruise" that is usually the time when one of the pilots can take a break and use the bathroom. Lets say the captain does just this - tells the co-pilot to take the controls because he has to use the bathroom. The captain leaves the flight deck and proceeds to the underbelly of the aircraft to pull the breakers of the ACARS system.

When the captain returns to the flight deck the co-pilot is making his final transmission to ATC "all right, good night". The captain reaches over and turns off the transponder and the co-pilot questions him. Thats when the captain attacks him. There is a struggle and the plane climbs to the 45,000' and descends to 23,000' that were reported. The captain finally incapacitates the co-pilot and returns the plane to 29,500' (vfr altitude). The captain changes the flight plan in the FMC and heads west.

Like I said back on the 14th


If that report from RR is correct then it flew for 4 hours after the final communication with ATC. Unless they flew to the north (which is highly unlikely) or further west which the data does not suggest the most likely path they took would be to the south with the plane either landing on some remote island near Australia or into the Indian Ocean. Christmas and Coco Islands both have airports but the chances of it landing there and nobody saying anything is not likely.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/1...05.691048,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0

https://www.google.com/maps/place/1...96.832663,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0

Except the pilot in the cockpit would know the ACARs got turned off. Plus the power was not pulled in the avionics bay because the plane still pinged satellites.

Maybe one pilot went to take a leak/chat up the flight attendants then the second pilot locked the cockpit door.... depressurizing and climbing to 45,000 feet and in the process incapacitating everyone else on board. There are walk around oxygen units but in the confusion the locked out pilot may not have gotten one in the 2 minutes before passing out.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,134
38
91
Why is there no talk about the black box? Shouldn't it be findable no matter what for 30 days?
 

dud

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,635
73
91
This thread delivers everything but Darkman theorizing that George Zimmerman had something to do with the loss of the 777.
 

TangoJuliet

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2006
5,595
1
76
Except the pilot in the cockpit would know the ACARs got turned off. Plus the power was not pulled in the avionics bay because the plane still pinged satellites.

Maybe he noticed that it turned off and was going to tell the captain once he returned. Its not like its a big deal if it turned off. Although you are correct - it wouldn't "ping" if the power was off. More than likely it was switched into a standby mode.

Maybe one pilot went to take a leak/chat up the flight attendants then the second pilot locked the cockpit door.... depressurizing and climbing to 45,000 feet and in the process incapacitating everyone else on board. There are walk around oxygen units but in the confusion the locked out pilot may not have gotten one in the 2 minutes before passing out.

I think thats what I was getting at but you don't need to climb to depressurize the aircraft. As long as the plane is above 18,000 feet it should have the same effect although the higher you get the effects of hypoxia would happen faster
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,134
38
91
You can't be serious. ..

Why wouldn't I be serious, you goddamn smartass? I know little about airplanes and I'm asking a fucking question. Can't answer it, let the experts or those who know more. We don't need a jackass in this thread that determines whether questions are below or above a threshold they've made up themselves.

If you have a problem with what I've said above, fuck off.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |