Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Insomniator
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I've been thinking about it, what is the difference between killing and eating a dog and a pig? They have been shown to have comparable intelligence and are both living animals. The only difference is YOU get attached to one and not the other because of your culture whilst this man sees both as edible animals. You can complain about moralities and what have you like in that article, but then it just go back to the old poem of the "The White Man's Burden" which satires the belief that your culture >>> their culture and therefore you must force everyone to live by your rules. be Animal rights groups FTMFL.
Do animal rights groups specifically protest eating a particular species? I'm pretty sure they never say its ok to kill chickens but not dogs. They just don't want either animal to be tortured, or animals in general to be eaten at all.
Except dogs have been man's companion for 100s of years so obviously people will have a stronger bond. Tell me when a pig or chicken has protected a family, saved a life, assisted a disabled person, etc...
Again your society, not his. Not all societies domesticated dogs. Use context, I don't care about your background, this is not about you, which seems like such a hard concept for some people to grasp. It's about him, his culture and his society.
Also tell me the last time a chicken bit and killed a child.