making an arrest that was not worth it to be honest.
Yeah, they should just walk away
making an arrest that was not worth it to be honest.
My bad. Watching it for the umpteenth time, I hear that he does say it twice when he is first down in the ground and the cop is rolling off his back. The cop then let's go at that point.
And technically, if you talk to anyone involved in MMA, it was not a chokehold. Yes, the cop did grab him around the neck, but it is not a chokehold.
- Merg
I never said let him go. I said get off of him and undo the chokehold they had on him for a brief second to see wtf was going on with his health. All of those officers standing 3 yards aside for a fat black man waiting to pounce on him if he got up from the pavement. If he got up, then yeah, jump on him again, but they were adamant about making an arrest that was not worth it to be honest. Now the city taxpayers got to pay for the cleanup.
Actually, the more I watch the video, I wonder if the death was caused more from the officers being on his back when they were trying to subdue him as opposed to the chokehold. Obviously, a couple 200 pound guys on the back of a guy does put pressure on the diaphragm.
- Merg
Never mind, he was yelling, "I can't breathe."
-John
I never said let him go. I said get off of him and undo the chokehold they had on him for a brief second to see wtf was going on with his health. All of those officers standing 3 yards aside for a fat black man waiting to pounce on him if he got up from the pavement. If he got up, then yeah, jump on him again, but they were adamant about making an arrest that was not worth it to be honest. Now the city taxpayers got to pay for the cleanup.
He said it about 11 or 12 times that he can't breath! Wtf else do you want?
Sure, he could have had a weapon, but he's not likely to draw it with his teeth, so why the choke hold? There are at least six cops there; surely they can control his limbs without choking him out.If he has a weapon and they let him go before being handcuffed who's fault is that. They needed to handcuff him first. Anybody can possibly have a weapon, even a 12 year old kid.
So a big and fat person cannot present a danger? It took 4 cops to put him on the ground. Yeah, I'm sure he couldn't have hurt anyone.
And it all comes down to failing to follow directions again. He was told he was under arrest and when they try to arrest him he prevents them from doing so.
Actually, the more I watch the video, I wonder if the death was caused more from the officers being on his back when they were trying to subdue him as opposed to the chokehold. Obviously, a couple 200 pound guys on the back of a guy does put pressure on the diaphragm.
- Merg
If a cop is hands on with a subject trying to arrest him, they are not going to let him go AT ANY TIME until he is cuffed. People being arrested will say anything to keep from being arrested. They need to have him cuffed first and then they can deal with any medical issues that come up.
- Merg
Cops need to learn that they can back off.
They have the entire legal system at their disposal.
Whatever this person did, he's a person.
-John
Cops dropped the ball here. Where is the justice here America?
We, as a society, can not be expected to be patient, while the people we ALLOW to govern us, attack us.
It's not right.
-John
Of course that is what you see.
Everyone is against Mizzou
-John
I don't necessarily trust the dude running the commentary tract, but it doesn't SEEM like the cops even caught the guy selling unstamped cigarettes on this particular day. It's more like "Well, there was a disturbance, and we had to come out here so we're going to arrest somebody, and we've caught you selling unstamped cigarettes before, so we're going to arrest you. Maybe you'll have something on you."I never said let him go. I said get off of him and undo the chokehold they had on him for a brief second to see wtf was going on with his health. All of those officers standing 3 yards aside for a fat black man waiting to pounce on him if he got up from the pavement. If he got up, then yeah, jump on him again, but they were adamant about making an arrest that was not worth it to be honest. Now the city taxpayers got to pay for the cleanup.
It's not clear to me to this dude even was committing a crime at the time. Seems to me that far too often guys (especially black guys) get arrested and the charges basically boil down to resisting arrest, without any particularly valid reason for the arrest. IMO if there are no valid prosecutable charges for the arrest, then simple resisting arrest should be dropped as well.I'd tell you that that would mean a complete destruction of the legal system...but I would be a bit of a hypocrite. Many agencies routinely "back off" from arrestable traffic offenses because it is of a too severe danger to innocent people. I think that is an OK policy, even though it lets many crazy criminals run free. But I don't think that's necessarily for the criminals safety...it's more to not let other people get hurt over something possibly minor.
Cops need to learn that they can back off.
They have the entire legal system at their disposal.
Whatever this person did, he's a person.
-John
They are public servants. Close to the opposite of heroes.Heroes dont back down in the face of adversity.
They are public servants. Close to the opposite of heroes.
-John