HomerJS
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2002
- 36,370
- 28,232
- 136
Great article. Key points that I found interesting.
And.
The author does a great job of laying out the burden on the GJ when it comes to assigning criminality. Criminality that is based on intent. However, he then claims that an indictment would be appropriate based on an opinion that is completely opposite the grounds he previously layed out.
There was no intent to commit homicide therefore there is noting the GJ can do regarding a criminal indictment.
However, again, civilly this cop and the PD are screwed.
As to one of the key points...
By contrast, the criminal law usually does not hold a person liable unless he intends, or at least should have foreseen, the natural consequences of his actions
Even a layman knows if the inability to breath persists death will occur.