man dies after NYPD cop puts him in chokehold

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
What a bunch of trash those cops are. If this is really true, that the man killed by the police was truly innocent in all of this, the family should get the killer's head on a freakin' platter. Obviously that's a metaphor, but the cop in this case should be tried for murder and go away for life. Guy was basically begging for his life. Im guessing the cop was just dying to try out the new choke hold he learned by watching Youtube.

That's bullshit - if the guy resists arrest he is automatically a threat - as with anyone - the cops don't know you or what you are capable of - nor do you know why the cops were there to pick him up or what information they had to go on.

I'm really sick of the media portraying everyone who keeps resisting orders as people to feel sorry for. If this guy would have done as he was told he would be alive today PERIOD.

From the article I read, it looks like the cops thought he was selling tax free cigarettes. They accused him of such, and then attempted to arrest him without cause. The cops cannot arrest you without cause, so him resisting would be justified I assume. Its not like he hit a cop, he just said no.
Should be charged with manslaughter, all of them. If you are a cop, you are supposed to be more trained than others in these types of things, including when to use your weapon.
The guy wasn't violent to being with! He was trying to talk calmly with the police and explain what happened

They had cause to arrest him from his prior record which is why they were there to arresting him. The fact that he said NO made him aggressive - if he was being peaceful he would have followed orders - he wasn't going in, he was resisting arrest, and escalating the situation.

From reviewing the video, it looks like the Police Dept.'s best defense at the moment is that it was an accidental death due in most part to the victim's refusal to cooperate and the victim's health condition at that time.
Those cops were probably threatened by his size. Being 6'9", I can understand how people are threatened just by existing. Body language is also important. I watched the video on mute and noticed that he resisted being handcuffed. It doesn't matter if you are completely innocent, never fight the cuffs is rule #1. The cops wanted to feel safer with his hands bound. Their fear resulted in a completely unfounded death.

Exactly. Cops do not know what a resisting person is capable of; likely they have been in terrible situations before that got out of hand when they did just sit and try and talk. Cops ARE NOT negotiators. If this guy would have LISTENED and followed orders he would still be alive today.

"following proper established procedure" Yes. To protect and serve... themselves.

And how exactly does this serve the cops in this case??? Do you think they aren't smart enough to know there are smart phones everywhere? It is more likely they were doing their job the best they were trained how than for some conspiracy that they were doing it for their own gain in front of a crowd of people recording everything.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
haha
Exactly. Cops do not know what a resisting person is capable of; likely they have been in terrible situations before that got out of hand when they did just sit and try and talk. Cops ARE NOT negotiators. If this guy would have LISTENED and followed orders he would still be alive today.
And how exactly does this serve the cops in this case??? Do you think they aren't smart enough to know there are smart phones everywhere? It is more likely they were doing their job the best they were trained how than for some conspiracy that they were doing it for their own gain in front of a crowd of people recording everything.

Are you a paid shill for the Police???

God I love your outlook...so to sum it up -- their training led them to kill him?? That about sums it up......
 

Veliko

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2011
3,597
127
106
That's bullshit - if the guy resists arrest he is automatically a threat - as with anyone - the cops don't know you or what you are capable of - nor do you know why the cops were there to pick him up or what information they had to go on.

I'm really sick of the media portraying everyone who keeps resisting orders as people to feel sorry for. If this guy would have done as he was told he would be alive today PERIOD.

Given that this man died as a result of the police's actions I don't see how anyone can claim that he isn't a victim.
 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
Are you a paid shill for the Police??? God I love your outlook...so to sum it up -- their training led them to kill him?? That about sums it up......

Given that this man died as a result of the police's actions I don't see how anyone can claim that he isn't a victim.

No, what killed him was the actions of the guy himself; he got himself killed - you can't fix stupid.

Like I already said... he could have peacefully surrendered, gone down to the station and cleared everything up he wanted - did he, NO, most law abiding innocent victim people would have - COPS ARE NOT NEGOTIATORS to negotiate with and debate with and fight arrest on when they say they are taking you to jail... that is not within the scope of their job description and nor should it be.
 
Last edited:

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
No, what killed him was the actions of the guy himself; he got himself killed - you can't fix stupid. Like I already said... he could have peacefully surrendered, gone down to the station and cleared everything up he wanted - COPS ARE NOT NEGOTIATORS to negotiate with and debate with and fight arrest on when they say they are taking you to jail... that is not within the scope of their job description and nor should it be.

I'm sure anytime a cop asks to search you, you'll happily comply too.
 

Veliko

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2011
3,597
127
106
No, what killed him was the actions of the guy himself; he got himself killed - you can't fix stupid. Like I already said... he could have peacefully surrendered, gone down to the station and cleared everything up he wanted - COPS ARE NOT NEGOTIATORS to negotiate with and debate with and fight arrest on when they say they are taking you to jail... that is not within the scope of their job description and nor should it be.

You sound like an incredibly stupid person.

And as you said yourself, you can't fix stupid.

So I'm just going to laugh at you and your stupid collection of brain cells that somehow manages to drag you from one day to the next.
 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
I'm sure anytime a cop asks to search you, you'll happily comply too.

They weren't asking to SEARCH the guy; they told him point blank - YOU ARE UNDER ARREST... what does he do - says NO - ... what should he have done; given into the arrest - gone down to the station - fought the charges, got paid for any time spent in jail if he were innocent - gone about it the right way on his part.

And yes; if they thought I had a weapon/drugs on me I would let them search me as EVERYONE DOES AT AIRPORTS... really!. If i didn't think they had cause to search me - I WOULD LET THEM SEARCH ME - and then I would file a complaint of sexual harassment at their office - which they take VERY seriously.
 
Last edited:

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
You sound like an incredibly stupid person.

And you sound like a person who would rather stoop to name calling then actually make your case. Why is this guy such a victim when it was his actions that led the cops to behave how they did? Why is this guy a victim when he is the one with all the warrants for arrest? Why is this guy a victim when he resisted arrest?

That is not a person who I deem a victim - a victim is someone who submits to arrest but gets beaten anyway or killed anyway. What I see is not a victim.
 
Last edited:

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
They weren't asking to SEARCH the guy; they told him point blank - YOU ARE UNDER ARREST... what does he do - says NO - ... what should he have done; given into the arrest - gone down to the station - fought the charges, got paid for any time spent in jail if he were innocent - gone about it the right way on his part.

And yes; if they thought I had a weapon/drugs on me I would let them search me as EVERYONE DOES AT AIRPORTS... really!. If i didn't think they had cause to search me - I WOULD LET THEM SEARCH ME - and then I would file a complaint of sexual harassment at their office - which they take VERY seriously.

Lol!!! I can see it now. "Sir, did you give them consent to search you?" "Yes" "Case closed."

 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
Lol!!! I can see it now. "Sir, did you give them consent to search you?" "Yes" "Case closed."

This isn't how it would work actually - not in the slightest - you have little knowledge of how things against law enforcers are actually dealt with.

I know a cop who shot a HUB CAP to get a person going the wrong way on a road to PULL OVER - it turns out the guy was a vet who was a little crazy... and it was still a great deal of stress and concern that the family was going to sue him over stress and trauma this cop caused to this vet. The lawyer ACTUALLY SAID it would have been better had you shot the guy. Either way - lives of Cops get screwed. They are not given it easy no matter what you think. You aren't inside or have any inside intel on ANY of what you know.

I know a cop who had to retire because some secretary filed a sexual harassment on him for TELLING HIS BUDDY on the phone that he should tell his wife to get into the kitchen.

I know a cop who got fired because his wife (separated at the time) got angry and informed his department that he was cheating on her (regardless that they were separated - it didn't matter).

There are 1000 of cases... this is no different - that guy is clearly being hostile.
 
Last edited:

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
Why don't you fill us in since you're implying you know exactly what happens?

I never said I know EXACTLY what happens - but I know mostly what happens and definitely more than you do.

With sexual harassment charges - it would be brought to court in front of a jury like anything else if you wanted. The cop will be put on leave with no pay. It would go to his supervisors, likely the lieutenant or up depending on how adamant you were. The cop would get a mark on his record - which isn't a good thing - or suspended - but seriously, for a grazing of the boobs - what more do you want? Less happens to an executive of an office. There isn't many cops that will search you for sexual reasons anyway and it is policy to have a girl pull out her bra than to pat over it. They don't go into the crotch area at all and if you are deemed to be going to jail they inform you that you should admit to anything because it becomes a felony if you go into the jail with it. It is more than what happens to security guards at the airport who aren't even trained law enforcement agents and more want to grope you and look at you naked than any law enforcement cares. You act like cops are all perverts when they request to search you - in which - they are not... personal body searches are usually before you go to jail - mostly they are looking for knives and guns - they could care less if you have drugs on you when you go into jail - the jailors will find that and you will get your ass handed to you on charges.

As for this case - and the video I saw - the cops handled this pretty damn well. He wasn't beaten; he was held down - the choke hold - maybe it isn't in their policy but a lot of Cops are from out of the military and it is part of their training - and in instances like these that training still takes over because it was ingrained - but you don't know why a choke hold was used... or if it was even intended or more to add weight to tackle and where the neck was a convenient place to hold on to. The cops listened to this guy but it is still their job to take him in for arrest if they have cause to do so. They already told the guy he was going - he was going to go. The guy was showing aggressive behavior with body language and tone and resisted putting his hands behind his back - only after this resistance did the cop go to subdue him - if he would have put his hands behind his back at the cops attempt, nothing would have happened. A lot of people say they can't breath - but like one person said, the fact he was talking means he could - if he could calm himself down - likely he didn't die from the choking at all - but you wouldn't know without the coroners statement otherwise it is speculation. The fact he had asthma was unknown to the cops and couldn't have been foreseen when making their actions.

This guy then - with the video - would be alive and could have gone to the media for wrongful arrest.
 
Last edited:

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
No, what killed him was the actions of the guy himself; he got himself killed - you can't fix stupid.

Like I already said... he could have peacefully surrendered, gone down to the station and cleared everything up he wanted - did he, NO, most law abiding innocent victim people would have - COPS ARE NOT NEGOTIATORS to negotiate with and debate with and fight arrest on when they say they are taking you to jail... that is not within the scope of their job description and nor should it be.
<--- a Police shill....gotta love you....the Police obviously screwed the pooch regardless of what this individual did.....the Police using their training -- and professionalism - over reacted and killed the man!!

Did I get it correct??
 
Last edited:

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally Posted by RandomWords
No, what killed him was the actions of the guy himself; he got himself killed - you can't fix stupid.

You sound like an incredibly stupid person.

And as you said yourself, you can't fix stupid.

So I'm just going to laugh at you and your stupid collection of brain cells that somehow manages to drag you from one day to the next.

Just put him on ignore. Obviously yet another new paid shill poster.
 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
Did I get it correct??

Nope. Besides there being a law in that city against choke holds - likely taught to this particular cop in the military - I think they did their job wonderfully - I think it was an accident and I'm not entirely sure it was the choking that killed him. He wasn't being a peaceful citizen - he was clearly fighting - but it took under 10 seconds for the four officers to get him down to the ground effectively and without any aggressive acts.

He was still alive when the choke hold was released - it was only held for 13 seconds. The guy doesn't look like he passed out since he still had to be held down... but you can clearly see in the video that the person choking him ended it and started holding his upper body / head down..

Edit: I don't know what you see - or if you are just using your ears... but that is what I see on the video.
 
Last edited:

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
I never said I know EXACTLY what happens - but I know mostly what happens and definitely more than you do.

In other words, you don't know jack shit.

With sexual harassment charges - it would be brought to court in front of a jury like anything else if you wanted. The cop will be put on leave with no pay. It would go to his supervisors, likely the lieutenant or up depending on how adamant you were. The cop would get a mark on his record - which isn't a good thing - or suspended - but seriously, for a grazing of the boobs - what more do you want? Less happens to an executive of an office. There isn't many cops that will search you for sexual reasons anyway and it is policy to have a girl pull out her bra than to pat over it. They don't go into the crotch area at all and if you are deemed to be going to jail they inform you that you should admit to anything because it becomes a felony if you go into the jail with it. It is more than what happens to security guards at the airport who aren't even trained law enforcement agents and more want to grope you and look at you naked than any law enforcement cares. You act like cops are all perverts when they request to search you - in which - they are not... personal body searches are usually before you go to jail - mostly they are looking for knives and guns - they could care less if you have drugs on you when you go into jail - the jailors will find that and you will get your ass handed to you on charges.

Lol... who said anything about sexual harrassment charges??? Are you in your own little world? Do you understand that consenting to a police search is giving up your right?
 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
Lol... who said anything about sexual harrassment charges??? Are you in your own little world? Do you understand that consenting to a police search is giving up your right?

You asked what I would do - that's what I would do if a cop just searched me with no PC. I wouldn't attack him, nor resist and cause anyone's life to be in danger. I understand the whole nation has given up this right at airports so I don't see what your concern with giving consent on a police search is for - unless you have something always on you - and it has gone completely off the topic. Also, after you are under arrest (Which is when most personal body searches are done - unless we are talking about car searches) then I don't believe "refusal to be searched" is within your rights as they state them.

And saying I don't know exactly what happens doesn't mean I know jack shit - what I think is you have a problem that I side with cops and are yourself a cop hater probably for unjustifiable reasons - that paragraph I wrote on sexual harassment IS basically what happens - ask anyone that has first hand knowledge.
 
Last edited:

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,134
38
91
still have to pay a bondsman, money you will never get back..... think of people working at the lowest rungs of society, missing a day of work because your in jail (even if you are innocent) most of the time will get you fired from a job like that...

the justice system ruins family left and right..

in some small towns it takes days to even see the judge for the arraignment hearing, you could be sitting in jail, for two day, no way to contact anyone on the outside (if you've ever been to jail you'd know there are phones, but they are collect calls only, and last time i was there (4 or 5 years ago) just to answer the phone it costs 8 bucks and some change.. and the phones can only call lan lines,... it's terrible.

people get arrested for minor shit these days and lose everything.

That's seriously fucked up.

EDIT: I read an Economist article years ago where the government comes down hard on all the accrued costs people rack up when going through the system. If you don't pay, they fuck you up even more. The cycle is endless.
 
Last edited:

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
You asked what I would do - that's what I would do if a cop just searched me with no PC. I wouldn't attack him, nor resist and cause anyone's life to be in danger. I understand the whole nation has given up this right at airports so I don't see what your concern with giving consent on a police search is for - unless you have something always on you - that's a BS statement -- if you have nothing to hide, then you won`t mind giving up your rights....sad and pathetic....little man....

and it has gone completely off the topic. Also, after you are under arrest (Which is when most personal body searches are done - unless we are talking about car searches) then I don't believe "refusal to be searched" is within your rights as they state them.

And saying I don't know exactly what happens doesn't mean I know jack shit - what I think is you have a problem that I side with cops and are yourself a cop hater probably for unjustifiable reasons - that paragraph I wrote on sexual harassment IS basically what happens - ask anyone that has first hand knowledge.

What`s interesting everybody including the Police department believe that the cop was wrong.....so why are you having such a tough time understanding that most cops are idiots??

https://gma.yahoo.com/video/nypd-officer-desk-duty-suspect-122805628.html

http://abcnews.go.com/US/nypd-releases-information-deadly-arrest/story?id=24634470

The New York police officer seen in a video apparently putting a chokehold on a man who later died has had his gun and badge taken away pending the outcome of investigations into what happened.
The NYPD announced tonight that Officer Daniel Pantaleo, an 8-year veteran, has been placed on "modified assignment," pending the outcome of the dual probes by the district attorney and Internal Affairs.

Police Commissioner Bill Bratton had announced Friday that the cop and his partner were on "desk duty," but they still had their guns and shields.

Eric Garner, who was 6-foot-3 and roughly 350 pounds, died Thursday as police struggled to arrest him, according to the NYPD. Police said he appeared to suffer a heart attack.

Emotional Rally Held for Man Who Died in Custody

NYPD Suspect Suffers Heart Attack, Dies At Hospital

Garner was arrested in Staten Island after he was allegedly seen selling "loosie" cigarettes, police said. Garner was known for selling individual cigarettes for 50 cents each in his Staten Island neighborhood.

Police said the cigarettes come from North Carolina and Garner is the end of the supply line. Because the Staten Island man allegedly sold cigarettes to children, the police called the cigarettes a "quality of life" issue in the neighborhood.

Garner's death has led to outrage, especially after video obtained by the New York Daily News appeared to show that the man was put into a chokehold as he was arrested.

The chokehold is prohibited by NYPD departmental policy.

Mayor Bill De Blasio called the video of the arrest "very troubling" and delayed a planned vacation for a day after hearing about the incident. De Blasio said NYPD internal affairs and the local district attorney were investigating the incident.

The video shows officers approaching Garner, who initially denies that he's selling loose cigarettes.

"I'm minding my business why don't you leave me alone," Garner can be heard saying.

Eventually when police officers move in, Garner appears to not comply and at least five officers wrestle him to the ground as they attempt to handcuff him.

As Garner is being held down, he can be heard telling police that he "can't breathe." Eventually when officers realize he is not responsive, they called in an ambulance, which took Garner to a hospital where he died a short time later.

The apparent violence of the arrest led to outrage and the internal investigation. On line, numerous people tweeted #JusticeforEricGarner, calling attention to the deadly incident.

Policeman's Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch, questioned by ABC News about what constitutes an appropriate use of force, said the public should not rush to judge before the official investigation is concluded.

"At times, when officers are required to make an arrest, they must employ the use of force in order to get compliance from an individual who NYPD policy requires must be rear-cuffed for transport to a precinct," Lynch said. "Force, by its very nature, is an ugly thing to witness. Taken out of the context of what is happening, necessary force can be misinterpreted to be excessive by those who are not trained in law enforcement procedures."

Garner's family has been devastated by the loss.

Garner's wife Esaw Garner collapsed into tears as she attended a crowded memorial rally today at Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network.

The mayor's commissioner for human affairs attended the rally and said the mayor is committed to strengthening the relationship between police and minority communities.

"This is going to be a real test to see where policies are in the city now and whether the change that we feel occurred has occurred," Sharpton said. "We are the only ones in the social setup that has to deal with fear of cops and robbers."
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
You asked what I would do - that's what I would do if a cop just searched me with no PC.
So you'd file sexual harassment charges against a cop for searching you. Mind you, this is AFTER you consented to the search.

I wouldn't attack him, nor resist and cause anyone's life to be in danger. I understand the whole nation has given up this right at airports so I don't see what your concern with giving consent on a police search is for - unless you have something always on you - and it has gone completely off the topic. Also, after you are under arrest (Which is when most personal body searches are done - unless we are talking about car searches) then I don't believe "refusal to be searched" is within your rights as they state them.
You want innocent people to lay down for cops. Its one thing if a cop places you under arrest and then searches you. Its another if you voluntarily consent to a search.

And saying I don't know exactly what happens doesn't mean I know jack shit - what I think is you have a problem that I side with cops and are yourself a cop hater probably for unjustifiable reasons - that paragraph I wrote on sexual harassment IS basically what happens - ask anyone that has first hand knowledge.
Hmmm, let me ask all my relatives who are cops.

 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Apparently the EMT's are in trouble for not giving the guy proper aid at the scene, checking his pulse and breathing, and for not putting an air bag on him and such.

Here is the video of the cop who killed him right after waving and smiling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2lA2kQa7Fk#t=411

and you see the EMTs not doing the proper triage on the guy, and the guy is clearly blue in the face from no oxygen.

Here is the article on them being put on modified duty: http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/modified-duty-for-medics-after-fatal-nyc-arrest
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |