Originally posted by: Shockwave
Waste of time my ass. Cops are NOT exempt from the law. And if he did indeed run the stop sign he should be ticketed.
Originally posted by: xSauronx
wy not ticket the cop? dont enough of them have problems thinking theyre above the law, especially traffic law? i dont know where youre from, but they do more than go "just over" the speed limit regularly where im from
Originally posted by: Mill
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
Originally posted by: Mill
Sure it is a waste of time. It was obvious the guy had a grudge because his son got a ticket, even though he tried to play it off. I don't think this should be allowed unless there is more than one witness. Otherwise you will have people swearing out complaints on officers for traffic tickets constantly, and who knows what code call they are on, or where they were going, or what they were doing. Police officers are trained, and the ones you see running lights without "sirens or lights" typically are on a silent high priority call. I'm not saying the Police do no wrong; they do just like any other occupation(trust me, I've been fvcked over too). I'm not saying they shouldn't be held to a higher standard because they should. What I am saying, however, was it doesn't appear like this guy did this in good faith. He is trying to start trouble, and in the end he gets burned. I highly doubt the judge will convict the guy anyway. Word of guy with an obvious grudge against an officer that doesn't remember.
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Mill
Sure it is a waste of time. It was obvious the guy had a grudge because his son got a ticket, even though he tried to play it off. I don't think this should be allowed unless there is more than one witness. Otherwise you will have people swearing out complaints on officers for traffic tickets constantly, and who knows what code call they are on, or where they were going, or what they were doing. Police officers are trained, and the ones you see running lights without "sirens or lights" typically are on a silent high priority call. I'm not saying the Police do no wrong; they do just like any other occupation(trust me, I've been fvcked over too). I'm not saying they shouldn't be held to a higher standard because they should. What I am saying, however, was it doesn't appear like this guy did this in good faith. He is trying to start trouble, and in the end he gets burned. I highly doubt the judge will convict the guy anyway. Word of guy with an obvious grudge against an officer that doesn't remember.
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
He doesn't have a grudge against the officer. We don't even know if the same officer stopped his son (did you read the article you linked?).
As for the cop saying "I don't remember?" Bullsh!t. It was a block ago and he can't remember. He probably just said that hoping the guy would f*&k off and think nothing else of it. Tough luck.
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Mill
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
1) I'm aware they can break the law to apprehend suspects
2) The story has made up parts. The biggets being I dont remember what the infraction was, but it was a case where my uncle did it and the cop did it as well, as under the conditions the cop did it were just as illegal.
3) Your stiking me as quite the dumbass this morning.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Mill
Sure it is a waste of time. It was obvious the guy had a grudge because his son got a ticket, even though he tried to play it off. I don't think this should be allowed unless there is more than one witness. Otherwise you will have people swearing out complaints on officers for traffic tickets constantly, and who knows what code call they are on, or where they were going, or what they were doing. Police officers are trained, and the ones you see running lights without "sirens or lights" typically are on a silent high priority call. I'm not saying the Police do no wrong; they do just like any other occupation(trust me, I've been fvcked over too). I'm not saying they shouldn't be held to a higher standard because they should. What I am saying, however, was it doesn't appear like this guy did this in good faith. He is trying to start trouble, and in the end he gets burned. I highly doubt the judge will convict the guy anyway. Word of guy with an obvious grudge against an officer that doesn't remember.
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
He doesn't have a grudge against the officer. We don't even know if the same officer stopped his son (did you read the article you linked?).
As for the cop saying "I don't remember?" Bullsh!t. It was a block ago and he can't remember. He probably just said that hoping the guy would f*&k off and think nothing else of it. Tough luck.
If you can't read between the lines, and see how this guy was only trying to cause trouble then I feel for you. I honestly do. If he was concerned about law and order then he would sit at that sign everyday and write down tag numbers and tail people and then call the police on them. He isn't concerned about it. Like all Americans he speeds, so he hardly has a rational basis for giving an officer a ticket. It is wasting resources. The guy has zero training.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Mill
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
1) I'm aware they can break the law to apprehend suspects
2) The story has made up parts. The biggets being I dont remember what the infraction was, but it was a case where my uncle did it and the cop did it as well, as under the conditions the cop did it were just as illegal.
3) Your stiking me as quite the dumbass this morning.
1. Your OP doesn't sound like it.
2. Sure it did.
3. That's just a reflection of yourself.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: xSauronx
wy not ticket the cop? dont enough of them have problems thinking theyre above the law, especially traffic law? i dont know where youre from, but they do more than go "just over" the speed limit regularly where im from
I love when people try to lecture me on things like this. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT GOES ON. You don't know what type of call they are on. There is a lot of misguided hatred for the police out there. I myself was a victim of some poorly trained officers and bad department, but it doesn't effect my perception of the police.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Mill
Sure it is a waste of time. It was obvious the guy had a grudge because his son got a ticket, even though he tried to play it off. I don't think this should be allowed unless there is more than one witness. Otherwise you will have people swearing out complaints on officers for traffic tickets constantly, and who knows what code call they are on, or where they were going, or what they were doing. Police officers are trained, and the ones you see running lights without "sirens or lights" typically are on a silent high priority call. I'm not saying the Police do no wrong; they do just like any other occupation(trust me, I've been fvcked over too). I'm not saying they shouldn't be held to a higher standard because they should. What I am saying, however, was it doesn't appear like this guy did this in good faith. He is trying to start trouble, and in the end he gets burned. I highly doubt the judge will convict the guy anyway. Word of guy with an obvious grudge against an officer that doesn't remember.
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
He doesn't have a grudge against the officer. We don't even know if the same officer stopped his son (did you read the article you linked?).
As for the cop saying "I don't remember?" Bullsh!t. It was a block ago and he can't remember. He probably just said that hoping the guy would f*&k off and think nothing else of it. Tough luck.
If you can't read between the lines, and see how this guy was only trying to cause trouble then I feel for you. I honestly do. If he was concerned about law and order then he would sit at that sign everyday and write down tag numbers and tail people and then call the police on them. He isn't concerned about it. Like all Americans he speeds, so he hardly has a rational basis for giving an officer a ticket. It is wasting resources. The guy has zero training.
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Mill
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
1) I'm aware they can break the law to apprehend suspects
2) The story has made up parts. The biggets being I dont remember what the infraction was, but it was a case where my uncle did it and the cop did it as well, as under the conditions the cop did it were just as illegal.
3) Your stiking me as quite the dumbass this morning.
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Mill
As for the story about the U-turn. BS. An officer can break a traffic law to apprehend a suspect or to enforce traffic laws. How the hell do you think they catch speeders hiding in the median, or chase in a high-speed pursuit?
1) I'm aware they can break the law to apprehend suspects
2) The story has made up parts. The biggets being I dont remember what the infraction was, but it was a case where my uncle did it and the cop did it as well, as under the conditions the cop did it were just as illegal.
3) Your stiking me as quite the dumbass this morning.
1. Your OP doesn't sound like it.
2. Sure it did.
3. That's just a reflection of yourself.
Wow, such amazing arguments.
You = teh dumbass. Confirmed.