Is this a post-fact world? I think we learned that humans were relying so heavily on our feelings as to change to overvalue evidence to support our positions. What we didn't realize was, instead of objective evidence tempering our feelings, our feelings distort the objectivity of our evidence.
Now we are left with a denial of our feelings because it is very easy to rationalize our positions as being apart from their influence.
This is not a new phenomenon, but the hazard I see is that our feelings when validated and properly assigned in my mind actually protect us from distorting our evidence, contrary to the fear.
As an example -- if we were to disregard the efforts to address systemic racism and create clear accountability with our police force, etc., and instead have a society where people actually seek to understand how someone else feels before acting, would they ever have to be taught that racism is wrong in order to understand that it is?
And I am not suggesting an either-or. I'm suggesting both. My skepticism of the systemic interventions is that they allow us to avoid confronting our conflicting feelings and the reality of the deep-seeded influences that race has on our society when we cognitively know it's wrong. When we have both worked on our capacity to appreciate the humanity of those different from us and addressed the systems that have supported these biases, then we will finally be able to settle the unrest we carry in our souls.
This model is one of individual responsibility and group accountability.